Exploring the teaching and learning of clinical reasoning, risks, and benefits of cervical spine manipulation

References

• Birks M, Chapman Y, Francis K. 2008. Memoing in qualitative research: probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing. 13:68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop MD, Mintken P, Bialosky JE, Cleland JA. 2013. Patient expectations of benefit from interventions for neck pain and resulting influence on outcomes. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 43:457–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM. 2004. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis. The Spine Journal. 4:335–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Canadian Physiotherapy Association Orthopaedic Division 2014 Orthopaedic division education guidelines for mentorship. http://orthodiv.org/documents/mentorship/2014-Mentorship-Guidelines-(English).pdf. Accessed: December 5, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Carlesso L, Bartlett DJ, Padfield B, Chesworth BM. 2007. Cervical manipulation and informed consent: canadian manipulative physiotherapists’ opinions on communicating risk. Physiotherapy Canada. 59:86–98.
   Google Scholar
• Carlesso LC, Gross AR, Santaguida PL, Burnie S, Voth S, Sadi J. 2010. Adverse events associated with the use of cervical manipulation and mobilization for the treatment of neck pain in adults: a systematic review. Manual Therapy. 15:434–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlesso LC, Macdermid JC, Santaguida PL, Thabane L, Giulekas K, Larocque L, Millard J, Williams C, Miller J, Chesworth BM. 2013. Beliefs and practice patterns in spinal manipulation and spinal motion palpation reported by Canadian manipulative physiotherapists. Physiotherapy Canada. 65:167–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter C, Suto M. 2008. Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapists: a practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Childs MJD, McRae M, Palmer JA, Stowell T. 2005. Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: A randomized clinical trial. Manual Therapy. 10:127–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey A, Atkinson P. 1996. Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. p. 26–53.
   Google Scholar
• Di Fabio RP. 1999. Manipulation of the cervical spine: risks and benefits. Physical Therapy. 79:50–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx De Casterlé B, Gastmans C, Bryon E, Denier Y. 2012. QUAGOL: A guide for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 49:360–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards I, Jones M, Carr J, Braunack-Mayer A, Jensen GM. 2004. Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy. Physical Therapy. 84:312–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson R, Fretz R, Shaw L. 1995. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flicker S, Nixon SA. 2015. The DEPICT model for participatory qualitative health promotion research analysis piloted in Canada, Zambia and South Africa. Health Promotion International. 30:616–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Martin DK. 2003. Qualitative research and evidence-based physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapy. 89:350–58.
   Google Scholar
• Green J, Thorogood N. 2004. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gross AR, Hoving JL, Haines TA, Goldsmith CH, Kay T, Aker P, Bronfort G. 2004. A Cochrane review of manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 29:1541–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldeman S, Carey P, Townsend M, Papadopoulos C. 2002. Clinical perceptions of the risk of vertebral artery dissection after cervical manipulation: the effect of referral bias. The Spine Journal. 2:334–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen GM, Gwyer J, Shepard KF, Hack LM. 2000. Expert practice in physical therapy. Physical Therapy. 80:28–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerry R, Taylor AJ, Mitchell J, McCarthy C. 2008. Cervical arterial dysfunction and manual therapy: A critical literature review to inform professional practice. Manual Therapy. 13:278–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzel AJ. 1999. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Eds. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications. p. 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S. 1996. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson I, Gard G. 2006. Conceptions of physiotherapy knowledge among Swedish physiotherapists: A phenomenographic study. Physiotherapy. 92:110–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Oberg GK, Normann B, Gallagher S. 2015. Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 31:244–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivett DA, Reid D. 1998. Risk of stroke for cervical spine manipulation in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 26:14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton A, Rivett D, Carlesso L, Flynn T, Hing W, Kerry R. 2014. International framework for examination of the cervical region for potential of cervical arterial dysfunction prior to orthopaedic manual therapy intervention. Manual Therapy. 19:222–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. 2000. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health. 23:334–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw JA, DeForge RT. 2012. Physiotherapy as bricolage: theorizing expert practice. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 28:420–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tracy S. 2010. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry. 16:837–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar