Intra- and inter-rater reliability of movement and palpation tests in patients with neck pain: A systematic review

References

• Aartun E, Degerfalk A, Kentsdotter L, Hestbaek L 2014 Screening of the spine in adolescents: Inter- and intrarater reliability and measurement error of commonly used clinical tests. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 15: 37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertilson BC, Grunnesjo M, Strender LE 2003 Reliability of clinical tests in the assessment of patients with neck/shoulder problems-impact of history. Spine 28: 2222–2231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billis EV, Foster NE, Wright CC 2003 Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation. Manual Therapy 8: 223–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson H, Rasmussen-Barr E 2013 Clinical screening tests for assessing movement control in non-specific low-back pain. A systematic review of intra- and inter-observer reliability studies. Manual Therapy 18: 103–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter R, Lubinsky J, Domholdt E 2011 Rehabilitation Research: Principles and Applications. Philadelphia, Pa, Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM, Teyhen DS, Wainner RS, Whitman JM 2008 Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of functioning, disability, and health from the orthopedic section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Journal Orthopedics Sports Physical Therapy 38: A1–A34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Childs J, Fritz JM, Whitman JM 2006 Interrater reliability of the history and physical examination in patients with mechanical neck pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 87: 1388–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneline MT, Cooperstein R, Young M, Birkeland K 2008 Spinal motion palpation: A comparison of studies that assessed intersegmental end feel vs excursion. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 31: 616–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneline MT, Young M 2009 A review of intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of static spinal palpation: A literature synthesis. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 32: 379–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanney WJ, George SZ, Kolber MJ, Young I, Salamh PA, Cleland JA 2014 Interrater reliability of select physical examination procedures in patients with neck pain. Physiotherapy Theory Practice 30: 345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanten WP, Olson SL, Ludwig GM 2002 Reliability of manual mobility testing of the upper cervical spine in subjects with cervicogenic headache. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 10: 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog W, Kats M, Symons B 2001 The effective forces transmitted by high-speed, low-amplitude thoracic manipulation. Spine 26: 2105–2110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Green S 2008 Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, West Sussex Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hill J, Lewis M, Papageorgiou AC, Dziedzic K, Croft P 2004 Predicting persistent neck pain: A 1-year follow-up of a population cohort. Spine 29: 1648–1654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollerwöger D 2006 Methodological quality and outcomes of studies addressing manual cervical spine examinations: A review. Manual Therapy 11: 93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppenbrouwers M, Eckhardt MM, Verkerk K, Verhagen A 2006 Reproducibility of the measurement of active and passive cervical range of motion. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 29: 363–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubka MJ, Phelan SP 1994 Interexaminer reliability of palpation for cervical spine tenderness. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 9: 591–595.
   Google Scholar
• Huijbregts PA 2002 Spinal motion palpation: A review of reliability studies. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 10: 24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrobjartsson A 2011 Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64: 96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP 2009 The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 339: b2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas NP, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Bogduk N 2010 The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL). Journal Clinical Epidemiology 63: 854–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher C, Adams R 1994 Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination. Physical Therapy 74: 801–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maigne JY, Chantelot F, Chatellier G 2009 Interexaminer agreement of clinical examination of the neck in manual medicine. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 52: 41–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy LS, Reinsch S, Najm WI, Dickerson VM, Seffinger MA, Adams A 2003 Spinal palpation: The challenges of information retrieval using available databases. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 26: 374–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin M, Carragee EJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Weiner SS, Hurwitz EL, Peloso PM 2009 Assessment of neck pain and its associated disorders: Results of the bone and joint decade 2000-2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 32: SS117–SS140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piva SR, Erhard RE, Childs JD, Browder DA 2006 Inter-tester reliability of passive intervertebral and active movements of the cervical spine. Manual Therapy 11: 321–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pool JJ, Hoving J, De Vet HC, van Mameren H, Bouter LM 2004 The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 27: 84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin G, Stokes M 1998 Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clinical Rehabilitation 12: 187–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson R, Robinson HS, Bjorke G, Kvale A 2009 Reliability and validity of a palpation technique for identifying the spinous processes of C7 and L5. Manual Therapy 14: 409–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein SM, van Tulder M 2008 A best-evidence review of diagnostic procedures for neck and low-back pain. Best Practice and Research Clinical Rheumatology 22: 471–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider GM, Jull G, Thomas K, Smith A, Emery C, Faris P, Salo P 2013 Intrarater and interrater reliability of select clinical tests in patients referred for diagnostic facet joint blocks in the cervical spine. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 94: 1628–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seffinger MA, Najm WI, Mishra SI, Adams A, Dickerson VM, Murphy LS 2004 Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature. Spine 29: E413–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J, Wright CC 2005 The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy 3: 257–268.
   Google Scholar
• Simopoulos TT, Manchikanti L, Singh V, Gupta S, Hameed H, Diwan S 2012 A systematic evaluation of prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Physician 3: E305–344.
   Google Scholar
• Smedmark V, Wallin M, Arvidsson I 2000 Inter-examiner reliability in assessing passive intervertebral motion of the cervical spine. Manual Therapy 5: 97–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stochkendahl MJ, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J, Vach W, Haas M, Hestbaek L 2006 Manual examination of the spine: A systematic critical literature review of reproducibility. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 29: 475–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Trijffel E, Anderegg Q, Bossuyt PM, Lucas C 2005 Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: A systematic review. Manual Therapy 10: 256–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting P, Harbord R, Kleijnen J 2005 No role for quality scores in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology 5: 19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar