Validation of the manual inclinometer and flexicurve for the measurement of thoracic kyphosis

References

• Azadinia F, Kamyab M, Behtash H, Ganjavian MS, Javaheri MR 2014 The validity and reliability of noninvasive methods for measuring kyphosis. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques 27: 212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal S, Katzman WB, Giangregorio LM 2014 Exercise for improving age-related hyperkyphotic posture: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 95: 129–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett E, McCreesh K, Lewis J 2013 Intrarater and interrater reliability of the flexicurve index, flexicurve angle, and manual inclinometer for the measurement of thoracic kyphosis. Rehabilitation Research and Practice 2013: 475870.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrett E, McCreesh K, Lewis J 2014 Reliability and validity of non-radiographic methods of thoracic kyphosis measurement: A systematic review. Manual Therapy 19: 10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods for clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476): 307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs A, Wrigley T, Tully E, Adams P, Greig A, Bennell K 2007 Radiographic measures of thoracic kyphosis in osteoporosis: Cobb and vertebral centroid angles. Skeletal Radiology 36: 761–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG 1990 Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs Intraobserver and Interobserver Variation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) 72: 328–333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaise FO, Candotti CT, Torre ML, Furlanetto TS, Pelinson PP, Loss JF 2011 Validation, repeatability and reproducibility of a non-invasive instrument for measuring thoracic and lumbar curvature of the spine in the sagittal plane. Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia 15: 511–517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chakraverty R, Pynsent P, Isaacs K 2007 Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines? Journal of Anatomy 210: 232–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J 1988 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• D’Osualdo F, Schierano S, Iannis M 1997 Validation of clinical measurement of kyphosis with a simple instrument, the arcometer. Spine 22: 408–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira TS, Candotti CT, La Torre M, Pelinson PP, Furlanetto TS, Kutchak FM, Loss JF 2012 Validity and reproducibility of the measurements obtained using the flexicurve instrument to evaluate the angles of thoracic and lumbar curvatures of the spine in the sagittal plane. Rehabilitation Research and Practice 2012: 186156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ensrud KE, Black DM, Harris F, Ettinger B, Cummings SR 1997 Correlates of kyphosis in older women. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 45: 682–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fon GT, Pitt MJ, Thies AC 1980 Thoracic kyphosis: Range in normal subjects. American Journal of Roentgenology 134: 979–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geravarina D 2015 Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochemia Medica 25: 141–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh S, Price RI, Leedman PJ, Singer KP 1999 Rasterstereographic analysis of the thoracic sagittal curvature: A reliability study. Journal of Musculoskeletal Research 3: 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Gravina AR, Ferraro C, Frizziero A, Ferraro M, Masiero S 2012 Goniometer evaluation of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis in subjects during growth age: A validity study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 176: 247–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greendale G, Nili N, Huang MH, Seeger L, Karlamangla A 2011 The reliability and validity of three non-radiological measures of thoracic kyphosis and their relations to the standing radiological Cobb angle. Osteoporos International 22: 1897–1905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griegel-Morris P, Larson K, Mueller-Klaus K, Oatis CA 1992 Incidence of common postural abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder, and thoracic regions and their association with pain in two age groups of healthy subjects. Physical Therapy 72: 425–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumina S, Giorgio GD, Postacchini F, Postacchini R 2008 Subacromial space in adult patients with thoracic hyperkyphosis and in healthy volunteers. Chirurgia Degli Organi Di Movimento 91: 93–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B 2001 Reliability of centroid, Cobb and Harrison posterior tangent methods: Which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis. Spine 26: 227–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Papazisis Z, Baikousis A 2001 Prediction of thoracic kyphosis using the Debrunner kyphometer. Journal of Spinal Disorders 14: 67–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leroux MA, Zabjek K, Simard G, Badeaux J, Coillard C, Rivard CH 2000 A non-invasive anthropometric technique for measuring kyphosis and lordosis, an application for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 25: 1689–1694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis JS, Green A, Reichard Z, Wright C 2002 Scapular position: the validity of skin surface palpation. Manual Therapy 7: 26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis JS, Valentine RE 2010 Clinical measurement of the thoracic kyphosis. A study of the intra-rater reliability in subjects with and without shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 11: 39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH 1990 Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of Intrinsic Error. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Am) 72: 320–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palastanga N, Field D, Soames R 2002 Anatomy and Human Movement: structure and Function. Oxford, UK, Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Perriman DM, Scarvell JM, Hughes AR, Ashman B, Lueck CJ, Smith PN 2010 Validation of the flexible electrogoniometer for measuring thoracic kyphosis. Spine 35: 633–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripani M, Di Cesare A, Giombini A, Agnello L, Fagnani F, Pigozzi F 2008 Spinal curvature: Comparison of frontal measurements with the spinal mouse and radiographic assessment. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 48: 488–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinaki M, Brey RH, Hughes CA, Larson DR, Kaufman KR 2004 Balance disorder and increased risk of falls in osteoporosis and kyphosis: Significance of kyphotic posture and muscle strength. Osteoporosis International 16: 1004–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi T, Ishida K, Hirose D, Nagano Y, Okumiya K, Nishinaga M, Matsubayashi K, Doi Y, Tani T, Yamamoto H 2005 Trunk deformity is associated with a reduction in outdoor activities of daily living and life satisfaction in community-dwelling older people. Osteoporosis International 16: 273–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira F, Carvalho G 2007 Reliability and validity of thoracic kyphosis measurement using flexicurve method. Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia 11: 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Van Blommestein AS, Lewis JS, Morrissey MC, MacRae S 2012 Reliability of measuring thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle and straight leg raise with an inclinometer. Open Spine Journal 4: 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Willner S 1981 Spinal pantograph: A non-invasive technique for describing kyphosis and lordosis in the thoraco-lumbar spine. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 52: 525–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar