Effects of in home high dose accelerometer-based feedback on perceived and actual use in participants chronic post-stroke

References

• Bailey RR, Birkenmeier RL, Lang CE 2015 Real-world affected upper limb activity in chronic stroke: An examination of potential modifying factors. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 22: 26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE 2014 An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity. PLoS One 9: e103135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballester BR, Maier M, San Segundo Mozo RM, Castaneda V, Duff A, Verschure PF 2016 Counteracting learned non-use in chronic stroke patients with reinforcement-induced movement therapy. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 13: 74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett AM 2010 Rose-colored answers: Neuropsychological deficits and patient-reported outcomes after stroke. Behavioral Neurology 22: 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett AM, Galletta EE, Zhang J, Masmela JR, Adler US 2014 Stroke survivors over-estimate their medication self-administration (MSA) ability, predicting memory loss. Brain Injury 28: 1328–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, De Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. 2017 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 135(10):e146–e603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Levack W, McPherson KM, Dean SG, Reed K, Weatherall M, Taylor WJ 2014 Survival, momentum, and things that make me “me”: Patients’ perceptions of goal setting after stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 36: 1020–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Adams N 2014 Stroke survivors’ experiences of somatosensory impairment after stroke: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Physiotherapy 100: 150–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Castellini G, Moja L, Gatti R 2015 Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in people with stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 10: CD004433.
   Google Scholar
• Crichton SL, Bray BD, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD 2016 Patient outcomes up to 15 years after stroke: Survival, disability, quality of life, cognition and mental health. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 87: 1091–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsch AK, Thomas S, Xu X, Kaiser W, Dobkin BH 2015 SIRRACT: An international randomized clinical trial of activity feedback during inpatient stroke rehabilitation enabled by wireless sensing. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 29: 407–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ 1999 The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30: 2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames S, Hoffmann T, Worrall L, Read S 2011 Stroke patients’ awareness of risk and readiness to change behaviors. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 18: 481–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S 1975 The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 7: 13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabrys L, Sperzel S, Bernhoerster M, Banzer W, Vogt L 2017 Real-time visual activity feedback for physical activity improvement in breast and colon cancer patients. Research in Sports Medicine 25: 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner C, Page SJ 2005 Applying the transtheoretical model to the exercise behaviors of stroke patients. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 12: 69–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gebruers N, Vanroy C, Truijen S, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP 2010 Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: A systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91: 288–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill L, Sullivan KA 2011 Boosting exercise beliefs and motivation through a psychological intervention designed for poststroke populations. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 18: 470–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghgoo HA, Pazuki ES, Hosseini AS, Rassafiani M 2013 Depression, activities of daily living and quality of life in patients with stroke. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 328: 87–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han CE, Arbib MA, Schweighofer N 2008 Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold. PLoS Computational Biology 4: e1000133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai M, Nozoe M, Izawa KP, Takeuchi Y, Kubo H, Mase K, Shimada S 2017 Promoting physical activity in hospitalized patients with mild ischemic stroke: A pilot study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 24: 256–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Yoo EY, Jung MY, Kim J, Park JH, Kang DH 2018 The effects of mental practice combined with modified constraint-induced therapy on corticospinal excitability, movement quality, function, and activities of daily living in persons with stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1337817.[ Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen TD, Simpson LA, Lim SB, Louie DR, Parappilly B, Sakakibara BM, Eng JJ 2016 “Stepping up” activity poststroke: Ankle-positioned accelerometer can accurately record steps during slow walking. Physical Therapy 96: 355–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, Schaefer SY, Birkenmeier RL 2013 Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: Foundations for clinical decision making. Journal of Hand Therapy 26: 104–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Waddell KJ, Klaesner JW, Bland MD 2017 A method for quantifying upper limb performance in daily life using accelerometers. Journal of Visualized Experiments 122: e55673.
   Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Chen CL, Lee PC 2010 Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale. Quality of Life Research 19: 435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Chen CL, Jang Y, Liu JS 2009 Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 23: 429–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston-Thomas JM, McGuire EP, Doucette TA, Tasker RA 2014 Voluntary forced use of the impaired limb following stroke facilitates functional recovery in the rat. Behavioural Brain Research 261: 210–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield A, Wong JS, Bryce J, Brunton K, Inness EL, Knorr S, Jones S, Taati B, McIlroy WE 2015 Use of accelerometer-based feedback of walking activity for appraising progress with walking-related goals in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 29: 847–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez CA, Mintz E, Ecsedy AE, Fisher BE 2017 Constraining movement reveals motor capability in chronic stroke: An initial study. Clinical Rehabilitation 31: 1126–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay C, Rapport LJ, Bryer RC, Casey J 2011 Self-evaluation of driving simulator performance after stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 18: 549–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michielsen ME, Selles RW, Stam HJ, Ribbers GM, Bussmann JB 2012 Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: A study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 93: 1975–1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore SA, Da Silva R, Balaam M, Brkic L, Jackson D, Jamieson D, Ploetz T, Rodgers H, Shaw L, van Wijck F, Price C 2016 Wristband Accelerometers to motiVate arm Exercise after Stroke (WAVES): Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials 17: 508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW, Taub E 2001 The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82: 750–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JH, Oliver T, Kroll T, Joice S, Williams B 2015 From physical and functional to continuity with pre-stroke self and participation in valued activities: A qualitative exploration of stroke survivors’, carers’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions of physical activity after stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation 37: 64–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JH, Oliver T, Kroll T, Joice S, Williams B 2016 Physical activity participation in community dwelling stroke survivors: Synergy and dissonance between motivation and capability. A qualitative study. Physiotherapy 103: 311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris JH, Oliver T, Kroll T, MacGillivray S 2012 The importance of psychological and social factors in influencing the uptake and maintenance of physical activity after stroke: A structured review of the empirical literature. Stroke Research and Treatment 2012: 195249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H 2005 The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53: 695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newitt R, Barnett F, Crowe M 2016 Understanding factors that influence participation in physical activity among people with a neuromusculoskeletal condition: A review of qualitative studies. Disability and Rehabilitation 38: 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorkoiv M, Rodgers H, Price CI 2014 Accelerometer measurement of upper extremity movement after stroke: A systematic review of clinical studies. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 11: 144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patomella AH, Kottorp A, Tham K 2008 Awareness of driving disability in people with stroke tested in a simulator. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 15: 184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC 1982 Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 19: 276–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shull PB, Jirattigalachote W, Hunt MA, Cutkosky MR, Delp SL 2014 Quantified self and human movement: A review on the clinical impact of wearable sensing and feedback for gait analysis and intervention. Gait and Posture 40: 11–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson LA, Eng JJ 2013 Functional recovery following stroke: Capturing changes in upper-extremity function. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 27: 240–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura-Lis W 2013 Teach-Back for quality education and patient safety. Urological Nursing 33: 267–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taub EM, Crago JE, Burgio LD, Groomes TE, Cook EW, DeLuca SC, Ne M 1994 An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: Overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. Journal of Experimental Anals of Behavior 61: 281–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub EM, Miller NE, Novack TA, Ew Iii C, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE 1993 Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 74: 347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub EM, Morris DM 2001 Constraint-induced movement therapy to enhance recovery after stroke. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 3: 279–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taub EM, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago JE, Chatterjee A 2006a A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke 37: 1045–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub EM, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM 2006b The learned nonuse phenomenon: Implications for rehabilitation. European Journal of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation 42: 241–256.
   Google Scholar
• Urbin MA, Bailey RR, Lang CE 2015 Validity of body-worn sensor acceleration metrics to index upper extremity function in hemiparetic stroke. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 39: 111–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, Zeringue A, Hobbs L, Wolf SL 2006a Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: Evidence from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 87: 1340–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Miltner WH, Foo B, Varma M, Moran S, Taub E 2000 Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke 31: 662–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA 2006b The Motor Activity Log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 67: 1189–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, De Vet HC, Bouter LM 2004 Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 35: 1410–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Markopoulos P, Yu B, Chen W, Timmermans A 2017 Interactive wearable systems for upper body rehabilitation: A systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 14: 20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Morrow JR 2004 Reliability of accelerometry-based activity monitors: A generalizability study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 36: 1637–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD 2016 Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 47: e98–e169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A 2001 Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32: 1635–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, Giuliani C, Light KE, Nichols-Larsen D 2006 Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296: 2095–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman GL, Olsen CG, Bosworth MF 2000 A ‘stages of change’ approach to helping patients change behavior. American Family Physician 61: 1409–1416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar