Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the sitting balance scale and function in sitting test in people with stroke

References

• Amusat N 2009 Assessment of sitting balance of patients with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 25: 138–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, De Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, et al. 2017 Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: A report from the american heart association. Circulation 135: e146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum M, Hill K, Kinsella R, Black S, Clark R, Brock K 2018 Comprehensive clinical sitting balance measures for individuals following stroke: A systematic review on the methodological quality. Disability and Rehabilitation 40: 616–630. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1261947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabanas-Valdes R, Urrútia-Cuchi G, Bagur-Calafat C 2013 Trunk training exercises approaches for improving trunk performance and functional sitting balance in patients with stroke: A systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation 33: 575–592. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-130996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Bullinger M, Scott C, Barofsky I 2002 Group vs individual approaches to understanding the clinical significance of differences or changes in quality of life. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 77: 384–392. doi: https://doi.org/10.4065/77.4.384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KL, Chou YT, Yu WH, Chen CT, Shih CL, Hsieh CL 2015 A prospective study of the responsiveness of the original and the short form Berg Balance Scale in people with stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 29: 468–476. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514549032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P, Lin K, Liing R, Wu C, Chen C, Chang K 2016 Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Quality of Life Research 25: 1585–1596. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1196-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinsongkram B, Chaikeeree N, Saengsirisuwan V, Horak FB, Boonsinsukh R 2016 Responsiveness of the balance evaluation systems test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. Physical Therapy 96: 1638–1647. doi: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi E, Wong C, Wan E, Tsu J, Chin W, Kung K 2016 The internal and external responsiveness of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Short Form-12 health survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) in patients with prostate cancer. Quality of Life Research 25: 2379–2393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1254-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J 1988 Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR 2003 Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56: 395–407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00044-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR 2004 An integrated method to determine meaningful changes in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 1153–1160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewan N, MacDermid JC, MacIntyre N 2018 Validity and responsiveness of the short version of the western ontario rotator cuff index (Short-WORC) in patients with rotator cuff repair. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 48: 409–418. doi: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2018.7928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Centor RM 1986 Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performance. Journal of Chronic Diseases 39: 897–906. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(86)90038-X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eton DT, Cella D, Yost KJ, Yount SE, Peterman AH, Neuberg DS, Sledge GW, Wood WC 2004 A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 898–910. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ 2001 A comparison of a modified oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the quebec back pain disability scale. Physical Therapy 81: 776–788. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/81.2.776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman SL, Harro CC, Platko C, Greenwald C 2014 Examining the function in sitting test for validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference in inpatient rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 95: 2304–2311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman SL, Radtka S, Melnick ME, Abrams GM, Byl NN 2010 Development and validation of the function in sitting test in adults with acute stroke. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 34: 150–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181f0065f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman SL, Rivera M, McCarthy L 2014 Reliability of the function in sitting test (FIST). Rehabilitation Research and Practice 2014: 593280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/593280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E 2000 Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disability and Rehabilitation 22: 702–715. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280050191972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, Sherwood CC, Barrett JE 1979 Stroke rehabilitation: Analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 60: 14–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G 1987 Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. Journal of Chronic Diseases 40: 171–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA 2006 Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Physical Therapy 86: 735–743. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/86.5.735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays RD, Woolley JM 2000 The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How Meaningful Is It? PharmacoEconomics 18: 419–423. doi: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200018050-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh Y, Wang C, Wu S, Chen P, Sheu C, Hsieh C 2007 Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel index in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 21: 233–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968306294729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Lin G, Lee S, Hsieh CA 2019 Comparison of the responsiveness of the postural assessment scale for stroke and the Berg Balance scale in patients with severe balance deficits after stroke. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. Epub ahead of print. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000247.
   Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD 2000 Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53: 459–468. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00206-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH 1989 Measurement of health status. ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials 10: 407–415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston BC, Ebrahim S, Carrasco-Labra A, Furukawa TA, Patrick DL, Crawford MW, Hemmelgarn BR, Schunemann HJ, Guyatt GH, Nesrallah G 2015 Minimally important difference estimates and methods: A protocol. BMJ Open 5: e007953. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr S, Brouwer B, Garland SJ 2010 Validity of the community balance and mobility scale in community-dwelling persons after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91: 890–896. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Chen CL, Jang Y, Liu JS 2009 Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the wolf motor function test in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 23: 429–434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308331144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen SC, Anderson BA 1988 Reliability of the modified motor assessment scale and the Barthel index. Physical Therapy 68: 1077–1081. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/68.7.1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch S, Leahy P, Barker S 1998 Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury. Physical Therapy 78: 128–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/78.2.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW 1965 Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal 14: 61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Medley A, Thompson M 2011 Development, reliability, and validity of the sitting balance scale. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 27: 471–481. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2010.531077.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan P 1994 The relationship between sitting balance and mobility outcome in stroke. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 40: 91–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60455-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morishita M, Amimoto K, Matsuda T, Arai Y, Yamada R, Baba T 2009 Analysis of dynamic sitting balance on the independence of gait in hemiparetic patients. Gait & Posture 29: 530–534. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics 2017 Health, United States 2016 With chartbook on long-term trends in health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus16.pdf#056
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwboer A, Feys H, De Weerdt W, Nuyens G, De Corte E 1995 Developing a clinical tool to measure sitting balance after stroke: A reliability study. Physiotherapy 81: 439–445. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66720-X.
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW 2003 Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Medical Care 41: 582–592. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G 1997 Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50: 869–879. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00097-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Wyrwich KW, Patrick DL 2007 The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients. Quality of Life Research 16: 815–822. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9180-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian S, Arya KN, Kumar D 2016 Minimal clinically important difference of the lower-extremity fugl-meyer assessment in chronic-stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 23: 233–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1179/1945511915Y.0000000003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S 1991 The timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 39: 142–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP 2009 Foundations of clinical research applications to practice 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, et al. 2012 Heart disease and stroke statistics—2012 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 125: e2–e220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ac046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero S, Bishop MD, Velozo CA, Light K 2011 Minimum detectable change of the Berg balance scale and dynamic gait index in older persons at risk for falling. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy 34: 131–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0b013e3182048006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawilowsky SS 2009 New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8: 597–599. doi: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP 2004 Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57: 1008–1018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen T, Seney M 2008 Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the Unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with Parkinsonism. Physical Therapy 88: 733–746. doi: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PW 2004 Getting more from the literature: Estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiotherapy Canada 56: 27–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.2310/6640.2004.15377.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Peat G, Jordan KP, Croft P, de Vet HC 2010 Mind the MIC: Large variation among populations and methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63: 524–534. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Medley A 2007 Forward and lateral sitting functional reach in younger, middle-aged, and older adults. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy 30: 43–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/00139143-200708000-00002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson M, Medley A, Teran S 2013 Validity of the sitting balance scale in older adults who are non-ambulatory or have limited functional mobility. Clinical Rehabilitation 27: 166–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215512452879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton M, Sveistrup H 2010 Intra- and inter-rater reliability and validity of the Ottawa Sitting Scale: A new tool to characterise sitting balance in acute care patients. Disability and Rehabilitation 32: 1568–1575. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903567893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang YL, Mak MK 2004 Sit-and-reach test can predict mobility of patients recovering from acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85: 94–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00377-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner D, Schünemann HJ, Griffith LE, Beaton DE, Griffiths AM, Critch JN, Guyatt GH 2009 Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 62: 374–379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A 2004 The Trunk Impairment Scale: A new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 18: 326–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr733oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM 2002 Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the motor component of the functional independence measure in stroke: The impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 55: 922–928. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00410-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong C, Lam C, Law W, Poon J, Kwong D, Tsang J, Wan Y 2013 Condition-specific measure was more responsive than generic measure in colorectal cancer: All but social domains. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66: 557–565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.11.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Liu J, Tanadini LG, Lammertse DP, Blight AR, Kramer JLK, Scivoletto G, Jones L, Kirshblum S, Abel R, et al. 2015 Challenges for defining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 53: 84–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrwich KW, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD 1999 Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52: 861–873. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00071-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu WH, Chen KL, Chou YT, Hsueh IP, Hsieh CL 2013 Responsiveness and predictive validity of the hierarchical balance short forms in people with stroke. Physical Therapy 93: 798–808. doi: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar