Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 39, 2023 - Issue 9
204
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Descriptive Reports

The Dutch language version of the Pain Disability Index (PDI-DLV): psychometric properties in breast cancer patients

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 2000-2014 | Received 15 Jun 2021, Accepted 20 Mar 2022, Published online: 04 Apr 2022

References

  • Abahussin AA, West RM, Wong DC, Ziegler LE 2019 PROMs for pain in adult cancer patients: A systematic review of measurement properties. Pain Practice 19: 93–117. 10.1111/papr.12711
  • Abma IL, Rovers M, Der Wees PJ V 2016 Appraising convergent validity of patient-reported outcome measures in systematic reviews: Constructing hypotheses and interpreting outcomes. BMC Research Notes 9: 226. 10.1186/s13104-016-2034-2
  • Altman DG, Bland JM 1983 Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D 32: 307–317.
  • Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP 1998 Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment 10: 176–181. 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176
  • Atkinson G, Nevill AM 1998 Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine 26: 217–238. 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002
  • Beckers LW, Smeets RJ 2020 Methodological and interpretive concerns about Beemster et al.’s article ‘The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent’: A letter to the editor. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 18: 301. 10.1186/s12955-020-01555-1
  • Beemster T, van Bennekom C, van Velzen J, Reneman M, Frings-Dresen M 2018 The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 16: 182. 10.1186/s12955-018-1000-1
  • Bidstrup PE, Mertz BG, Dalton SO, Deltour I, Kroman N, Kehlet H, Rottmann N, Gärtner R, Mitchell AJ, Johansen C 2012 Accuracy of the danish version of the ‘distress thermometer.’ Psycho-Oncology 21: 436–443. 10.1002/pon.1917
  • Brown TA, Chorpita BF, Korotitsch W, Barlow DH 1997 Psychometric properties of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behaviour Research and Therapy 35: 79–89. 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00068-X
  • Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST 2000 Reliability: What is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy 86: 94–99. 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61211-4
  • Chaker L, Falla A, van der Lee SJ, Muka T, Imo D, Jaspers L, Colpani V, Mendis S, Chowdhury R, Bramer WM, et al. 2015 The global impact of non-communicable diseases on macro-economic productivity: A systematic review. European Journal of Epidemiology 30: 357–395. 10.1007/s10654-015-0026-5
  • Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, Kalairajah Y 2008 Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: Which one to choose? International Orthopaedics 32: 1–6. 10.1007/s00264-007-0368-z
  • Chibnall JT, Tait RC 1994 The pain disability index: Factor structure and normative data. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 75: 1082–1086. 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90082-5
  • Cleeland CS, Ryan KM 1994 Pain assessment: Global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Annals of the Academy of Medicine 23: 129–138.
  • Cohen SR, Mount BM 2000 Living with cancer: “Good” days and “bad” days - What produces them? Cancer 89: 1854–1865. 10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1854::AID-CNCR28>3.0.CO;2-C
  • Cohen SR, Mount MB, Bruera E, Provost M, Rowe J, Tong K 1997 Validity of the mcgill quality of life questionnaire in the palliative care setting: A multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain. Palliative Medicine 11: 3–20. 10.1177/026921639701100102
  • Cohen SR, Mount BM, Strobel MG, Bui F 1995 The mcgill quality of life questionnaire: A measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability. Palliative Medicine 9: 207–219. 10.1177/026921639500900306
  • Collins SL, Moore AR, McQuay HJ 1997 The visual analogue pain intensity scale: What is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 72: 95–97. 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00005-5
  • Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Eccleston C, Mascagni T, Mertens G, Goubert L, Verstraeten K 2003 The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS-C): A preliminary validation. Pain 104: 639–646. 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00121-0
  • Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC 1983 Development of the wisconsin brief pain questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain 17: 197–210. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90143-4
  • de Beurs E, Van Dyck R, Marquenie LA, Lange A, Blonk RW 2001 De DASS: Een vragenlijst voor het meten van depressie, angst en stress [DE DASS: A questionnaire for measuring depression anxiety and stress]. Gedragstherapie 34: 35–54.
  • de Boer Ag, Taskila T, Ojajärvi A, van Dijk Fj, Verbeek JH 2009 Cancer survivors and unemployment: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA 301: 753–762. 10.1001/jama.2009.187
  • De Groef A, Devoogdt N, der Gucht E V, Dams L, Bernar K, Godderis L, Morlion B, Moloney N, Smeets A, Van Wilgen P, et al. 2019 EduCan trial: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education after breast cancer surgery on pain, physical, emotional and work-related functioning. BMJ Open 9: e025742. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025742
  • De Vrieze T, Coeck D, Verbelen H, Devoogdt N, Tjalma W, Gebruers N 2016 Cross-cultural psychometric evaluation of the Dutch McGill-QoL questionnaire for breast cancer patients. Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn 8: 205–209.
  • Ewertz M, Jensen AB 2011 Late effects of breast cancer treatment and potentials for rehabilitation. Acta Oncologica 50: 187–193. 10.3109/0284186X.2010.533190
  • Fangel LM, Panobianco MS, Kebbe LM, Almeida AM, Gozzo T 2013 Qualify of life and daily activities performance after breast cancer treatment. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem 26: 93–100. 10.1590/S0103-21002013000100015
  • Fann JR, Thomas-Rich AM, Katon WJ, Cowley D, Pepping M, McGregor BA, Gralow J 2008 Major depression after breast cancer: A review of epidemiology and treatment. General Hospital Psychiatry 30: 112–126. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.10.008
  • FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group 2016 BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) resource silver spring (MD): Food and drug administration (US);Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health (US).
  • Fox RS, Lillis TA, Gerhart J, Hoerger M, Duberstein P 2017 Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis of the DASS-21 depression and anxiety scales: How do they perform in a cancer sample? Psychological Reports 121: 548–565. 10.1177/0033294117727747
  • Gauthier N, Thibault P, Adams H, Sullivan MJ 2008 Validation of a french-canadian version of the pain disability index. Pain Research and Management 13: 461436. 10.1155/2008/461436
  • Grönblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, Järvinen E, Lukinmaa A, Kouri JP, Karaharju EO 1993 Inter-correlation and test-retest reliability of the pain disability index (pdi) and the oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clinical Journal of Pain 9: 189–195. 10.1097/00002508-199309000-00006
  • Harrington S, Michener LA, Kendig T, Miale S, George SZ 2014 Patient-reported upper extremity outcome measures used in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 95: 153–162. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.022
  • Hopkins WG 2000 Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine 30: 1–15. 10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001
  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX 2013 Applied logistic Regression. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hu L, Bentler PM 1999 Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6: 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hudak PL, Amadio P, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D, Davis A, Hawker G, Katz J, Makela M, Marx R, et al. 1996 Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand). American Journal of Industrial Medicine 29: 602–608. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L
  • Jensen MP, Karoly P 2001 Self-report scales and procedures for assessing pain in adults, Handbook of pain assessment (2nd ed). The Guilford Press, New York, NY, US, pp. 15–34.
  • Jerome A, Gross RT 1991 Pain disability index: Construct and discriminant validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 72: 920–922. 10.1016/0003-9993(91)90012-8
  • Johnson CE, Bennett KS, Newton J, McTigue J, Taylor S, Musiello T, Lau PK 2018 A pilot study to assess the validity of the DASS-21 subscales in an outpatient oncology population. Psycho-Oncology 27: 695–699. 10.1002/pon.4435
  • Kenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB 2014 The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods and Research 44: 486–507. 10.1177/0049124114543236
  • Köke AJ, Heuts PH, Vlaeyen JW, Weber WE 1999 Meetinstrumenten chronische pijn: Deel 1 functionele status [measuring instruments chronic pain part 1 functional status]. Pijn Kennis Centrum Maastricht, Maastricht. Accessed 4 may 2021.https://adoc.pub/download/meetinstrumenten-chronische-pijn.html
  • Kumar SP 2011 Utilization of brief pain inventory as an assessment tool for pain in patients with cancer: A focused review. Indian Journal of Palliative Care 17: 108–115. 10.4103/0973-1075.84531
  • Lamé IE, Peters ML, Kessels AG, Van Kleef M, Patijn J 2008 Test-retest stability of the pain catastrophizing scale and the tampa scale for kinesiophobia in chronic pain over a longer period of time. Journal of Health Psychology 13: 820–826. 10.1177/1359105308093866
  • Lee J, Lee EH, Moon SH 2019 Systematic review of the measurement properties of the depression anxiety stress scales–21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology. Quality of Life Research 28: 2325–2339. 10.1007/s11136-019-02177-x
  • Leysen L, Adriaenssens N, Nijs J, Pas R, Bilterys T, Vermeir S, Lahousse A, Beckwée D 2019 Chronic pain in breast cancer survivors: Nociceptive, neuropathic, or central sensitization pain? Pain Practice 19: 183–195. 10.1111/papr.12732
  • Leysen L, Beckwée D, Nijs J, Pas R, Bilterys T, Vermeir S, Adriaenssens N 2017 Risk factors of pain in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Supportive Care in Cancer 25: 3607–3643. 10.1007/s00520-017-3824-3
  • Lovelace DL, McDaniel LR, Golden D 2019 Long-term effects of breast cancer surgery, treatment, and survivor care. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health 64: 713–724. 10.1111/jmwh.13012
  • Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH 1995 The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy 33: 335–343. 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U
  • Marbouti L, Jafari H, Noorizadeh-Dehkordi S, Behtash H 2011 Pain-related disability measurement: The cultural adaptation and validation of “pain disability index (PDI)” and “pain disability questionnaire (PDQ)” among Iranian low back pain patients. Medical Journal of Islamic Republic of Iran 25: 27–34.
  • Masuri MG, Isa KA, Wahab NA 2010 Translation of the pain disability index (PDI) to malay with reliability evaluation and validation. International Conference on Science and Social Research (CSSR 2010), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pp 504–509.
  • Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, De Vet H, Terwee CB 2019 COSMIN study design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Accessed 10 May 2021. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf?msclkid=187a146bab0111ec8d639df4e2b45777
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet Hc, de Vet HCW 2010 The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63: 737–745. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
  • Novak CB, Anastakis DJ, Beaton DE, Mackinnon SE, Katz J 2010 Relationships Among pain disability, pain intensity, illness intrusiveness, and upper extremity disability in patients with traumatic peripheral nerve injury. Journal of Hand Surgery (Am) 35: 1633–1639. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.07.018
  • Office of the Surgeon General (US), Office on Disability (US), 2005 Reports of the surgeon general, the surgeon general’s call to action to improve the health and wellness of persons with disabilities. Office of the Surgeon General (US), Rockville (MD).
  • Osman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA, Hauptmann W, Jones J, O’Neill E 1997 Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 20: 589–605. 10.1023/A:1025570508954
  • Palmen C, Van der Meijden E, Nelissen Y, Koke A 2004 De betrouwbaarheid en validiteit van de nederlandse vertaling van de disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) [reliability and validity of the dutch translation of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH)]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Fysiotherapie 114: 50–54.
  • Pollard CA 1984 Preliminary validity study of the Pain Disability Index. Perceptual and Motor Skills 59: 974. 10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.974
  • Portney LG 2020 Foundations of clinical research: applications to evidence-based practice (4th ed). Boston, Massachusetts: F.A. Davis.
  • Portney LG, Watkins MP 2009 Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice (3rd ed). Pearson/Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ: Julie Levin Alexander.
  • Prinsen CA, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet Hc, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB 2018 COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research 27: 1147–1157. 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
  • Radbruch L, Loick G, Kiencke P, Lindena G, Sabatowski R, Grond S, Lehmann KA, Cleeland CS 1999 Validation of the german version of the brief pain inventory. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 18: 180–187. 10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00064-0
  • Roy J-S, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ 2009 Measuring shoulder function: A systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis & Rheumatism 61: 623–632. 5 10.1002/art.24396
  • Salovey P, Smith AF, Turk DC, Jobe JB, Willis GB 1993 The accuracy of memory for pain: Not so bad most of the time. APS Journal 2: 184–191. 10.1016/S1058-9139(05)80087-7
  • Saxena A, Mendoza T, Cleeland CS 1999 The assessment of cancer pain in north India: The validation of the hindi brief pain inventory - BPI-H. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 17: 27–41. 10.1016/S0885-3924(98)00104-3
  • Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J 2006 Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research 99: 323–338. 10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
  • Soer R, Köke AJ, Vroomen PC, Stegeman P, Smeets RJ, Coppes MH, Reneman MF, Reneman MF 2013 Extensive validation of the pain disability index in 3 groups of patients with musculoskeletal pain. Spine 38: E562–E568. 2013 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828af21f
  • Soer R, Reneman MF, Pcaj V, Stegeman P, Coppes MH 2012 Responsiveness and minimal clinically important change of the Pain Disability Index in patients with chronic back pain. Spine 37: 711–715. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822c8a7a
  • Sullivan MJ 2009 The pain catastrophizing scale user manual. Departments of psychology, medicine, and neurology, school of physical and occupational therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. Accessed 13 January 2021. https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/257422/Pain_Catastrophizing_Scale_Manual.pdf
  • Sullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J 1995 The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment 7: 524–532. 10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524
  • Sullivan MJ, Stanish W, Waite H, Sullivan M, Tripp DA 1998 Catastrophizing, pain, and disability in patients with soft-tissue injuries. Pain 77: 253–260. 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00097-9
  • Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S 1990 The Pain Disability Index: Psychometric properties. Pain 40: 171–182. 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90068-O
  • Tait R, Pollard CA, Margolis R, Duckro PN, Krause SJ 1987 The Pain Disability Index: Psychometric and validity data. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 68: 438–441.
  • Tan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF 2004 Validation of the brief pain inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. Journal of Pain 5: 133–137. 2 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer Mr, van der Windt Da, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet Hc, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, et al. 2007 Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60: 34–42. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
  • Ugurlu M, Ugurlu GK, Erten S, Kaymak SU, Ugurlu GK, Erten S, Kaymak SU, Erten S, Kaymak SU, Kaymak SU, et al., Caykoylu A 2016 reliability and factorial validity of the turkish version of the pain disability index in rheumatic patients with chronic pain. Archives of Rheumatology 31: 265–271. 2016 10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2016.5750
  • Wang L, Cohen JC, Devasenapathy N, Hong BY, Kheyson S, Lu D, Oparin Y, Kennedy SA, Romerosa B, Arora N, et al. 2020 Prevalence and intensity of persistent post-surgical pain following breast cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. British Journal of Anaesthesia 125: 346–357. 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.088
  • World Health Organization 2001 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva. Accessed 12 December 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42417?msclkid=10d6445fab0011ec93ebeb66a4aeb3c9
  • Wu JS, Beaton D, Smith PM, Hagen NA 2010 Patterns of pain and interference in patients with painful bone metastases: A brief pain inventory validation study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 39: 230–240. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.07.006

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.