Feasibility study of a home-based graded motor imagery intervention (GraMI protocol) for amputees with phantom limb pain

References

• Adams M, Caffrey L, C M 2015 Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: Findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre. Health Research Policy and Systems 13: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbulut A, Gungor F, Tarakci E, Aydin M, Halim A, Catal C 2022 Identification of phantom movements with an ensemble learning approach. Computers in Biology and Medicine 150 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbulut A, Gungor F, Tarakci E, Aydin MA, Zaim AH, Catal C Catal C 2022 Identification of phantom movements with an ensemble learning approach. Computers in Biology and Medicine 150: 106132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlMehman DA, Faden AS, Aldahlawi BM, Bafail MS, Alkhatieb MT, Kaki AM 2022 Post-amputation pain among lower limb amputees in a tertiary care hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal 43: 187–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade C 2020 Sample size and its importance in research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 42: 102–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Annaswamy T, Bahirat K, Raval G, Yen Y, Pham T, Prabhakaran B 2022 Clinical feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a novel mixed reality system to manage phantom pain: A pilot study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 8: 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aternali A, Katz J 2019 Recent advances in understanding and managing phantom limb pain [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 23: 8.
   Google Scholar
• Balakhanlou E, Webster J, Borgia M, Resnik R 2021 Frequency and severity of phantom limb pain in veterans with Major Upper limb Amputation: Results of a National Survey. PM&R 13: 827–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett SD, Smyer T 2003 Health screening practices in RURAL LONG-TERM CARE FACILITIES. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 29: 42–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beck AT 1961 An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 4: 561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisheim-Ryan EH, Hicks GE, Pohlig RT, Medina J, Sions JM 2021 Body image and perception among adults with and without phantom limb pain. PM&R 15: 278–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennell KL, Dobson F, Hinman RS 2014 Exercise in osteoarthritis: Moving from prescription to adherence. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 28: 93–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthelot J-M, Nizard J, Maugars Y 2019 The negative Hawthorne effect: Explaining pain overexpression. Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme 86: 445–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowering KJ, NE O, Tabor A, Catley MJ, Leake HB, Moseley GL, Stanton TR 2013 The effects of graded motor imagery and its components on chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pain 14: 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisman ETIA, Grens H, Wang R, Bhattacharya S, Braat DDM, Huppelschoten AG, Van Der Steeg JW 2022 Trends in research on pain relief during oocyte retrieval for IVF/ICSI: A systematic, methodological review. Human Reproduction Open 2022: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese L, Maffoni M, Torlaschi V, Pierobon A 2023 What is hidden behind amputation? Quanti-Qualitative Systematic Review on psychological adjustment and quality of life in lower limb amputees for Non-Traumatic Reasons. Healthcare 11: 1661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo-Prieto P, Rodríguez-Fuentes G 2018 Efectividad de la terapia de espejo en el dolor del miembro fantasma. Una revisión actual de la literatura. Neurología 37: 668–681.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chalya PL, Mabula JB, Dass RM, Ngayomela IH, Chandika AB, Mbelenge N, Gilyoma JM 2012 Major limb amputations: A tertiary hospital experience in northwestern Tanzania. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 7. 10.1186/1749-799X-7-18
   Google Scholar
• Collado-Mateo D, Lavín-Pérez AM, Peñacoba C, Del Coso J, Leyton-Román M, Luque-Casado A, Gasque P, Fernández-Del-Olmo MÁ, Amado-alonso D 2021 111Key factors associated with adherence to physical exercise in patients with chronic diseases and older adults: An umbrella review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 184: 2023:
   Google Scholar
• Collins KL, Russell HG, Schumacher PJ, Robinson-Freeman KE, EC O, Gibney KD, Yambem O, Dykes RW, Waters RS, Tsao JW 2018 A review of current theories and treatments for phantom limb pain. Journal of Clinical Investigation 128: 2168–2176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de AG, Martinez A, BP LA 2019 Assessment of the measurement properties of the Brazilian versions of the functional status score for the ICU and the functional independence measure in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva 31: 521–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duarte D, Bauer CCC, Pinto CB, Saleh Velez FG, Estudillo-Guerra MA, Pacheco-Barrios K, Gunduz ME, Crandell D, Merabet L, Fregni F 2020 Cortical plasticity in phantom limb pain: A fMRI study on the neural correlates of behavioral clinical manifestations. Psychiatry Research - Neuroimaging 304: 111151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn J, Yeo E, Moghaddampour P, Chau B, Humbert S 2017 Virtual and augmented reality in the treatment of phantom limb pain: A literature review. NeuroRehabilitation 40: 595–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupouy J, Ory-Magne F, Brefel-Courbon C 2017 Autresprisesen charge dans la maladie de Parkinson: psychologique, rééducative, éducationthérapeutique et nouvelles technologies. La Presse Médicale 46: 225–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eiser C, Darlington A-S, Stride CB, Grimer R 2001 Quality of life implications as a consequence of surgery: Limb salvage, primary and secondary amputation. Sarcoma 5: 189–195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eldridge ES, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA 2016 CONSORT 2010 statement: Extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot and feasibility studies 2: 64
   Google Scholar
• Erlenwein J, Diers M, Ernst J, Schulz F, Petzke F 2021 Clinical updates on phantom limb pain. PAIN reports 6: e888
   Google Scholar
• Fehlings MG, Sarhane KA, Wilson J, Tsao JW, Sb F, Bn P, Je C, Ls W, Sl J, Finn SB, et al. 2017 A randomized, Controlled Trial of Mirror Therapy for Upper Extremity Phantom limb pain in male amputees. Frontiers in Neurology 8: 267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira JC, Patino CM 2016 Randomização: mais do que o lançamento de umamoeda. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia 42: 310–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Leung C 2022 The effect of post-amputation pain on health-related quality of life in lower limb amputees. Disability and Rehabilitation 44: 2325–2331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzei F, Liepert J, Dettmers C, Adler T, Kiebel S, Rijntjes M, Weiller C 2001 Structural and functional cortical abnormalities after upper limb amputation during childhood. NeuroReport 12: 957–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M 2011 Measures of adult pain: Visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short form-36 bodily pain scale (SF. Arthritis Care and Research 63: 240–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X 2011 Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research 20: 1727–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzog MA 2008 Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health 31: 180–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hondras MA, Long CR, Haan AG, Spencer LB, Meeker WC 2008 Recruitment and enrollment for the simultaneous conduct of 2 randomized controlled trials for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain at a CAM research center. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 14: 983–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur A, Guan Y 2018 Phantom limb pain: A literature review. Chinese Journal of Traumatology - English Edition 21: 366–368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Limakatso K, Corten L, Parker R 2016 The effects of graded motor imagery and its components on phantom limb pain and disability in upper and lower limb amputees: A systematic review protocol. Systematic reviews 5: 145
   Google Scholar
• Limakatso K, Madden VJ, Manie S, Parker R 2020 The effectiveness of graded motor imagery for reducing phantom limb pain in amputees: A randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy 109: 65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limakatso K, Parker R 2021 Treatment recommendations for phantom limb pain in people with amputations: An expert consensus delphi study. PM & R: The journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation 13: 1216–1226.
   Google Scholar
• Lotze M, Moseley GL 2022 Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of Progressive Movement Imagery Training for Pathological Pain. The Journal of Pain 23: 1480–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy T, MB TD 2014 Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the revised short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Bone 23: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Maciver M, Dixon D, Powell D 2023 Quality of life in young people with limb loss: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation 1–12. 10.1080/09638288.2023.2270908
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacIver K, Lloyd DM, Kelly S, Roberts N, Nurmikko T 2008 Phantom limb pain, cortical reorganization and the therapeutic effect of mental imagery. Brain A Journal of Neurology 131: 2181–2191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Durand A, Doyon J 2007 The kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: A reliability and construct validity study. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 31: 20–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, Entwistle VA, Grant AM, Cook JA, Elbourne DR, Francis D, Garcia J, Roberts I, et al. 2006 What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 7: 9:
   Google Scholar
• Méndez-Rebolledo G, Gatica-Rojas V, Torres-Cueco R, Albornoz-Verdugo M, Guzmán-Muñoz E 2017 Update on the effects of graded motor imagery and mirror therapy on complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A systematic review. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 30: 441–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modest JM, Raducha JE, Testa EJ 2020 Eberson CP 2020 management of post-amputation pain. Rhode Island Medical Journal 103: 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley GL 2006 Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology 67: 2129–2134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens JG, Rauzi MR, Kittelson A, Graber J, Bade MJ, Johnson J, Nabhan D 2020 How new technology is improving physical therapy. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 13: 200–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Barrios K, de MP, Vasquez-Avila K, Cardenas-Rojas A, Gonzalez-Mego P, Marduy A, Parente J, Rebello-Sanchez I, Cortez P, Whalen M, et al. 2021 Accelerating the translation of research findings to clinical practice: Insights from phantom limb pain clinical trials. Principles and Practice of Clinical Research Journal 7: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson SJ, Foley S 2021 Clinician’s Guide to understanding effect size, alpha level, Power, and Sample size. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 36: 598–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirowska A, Wloch T, Nowobilski R, Plaszewski M, Hocini A, Ménager D 2014 Phantom phenomena and body scheme after limb amputation: A literature review. Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska 48: 52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajendram C, Ken-Dror G, Han T, Sharma P 2022 Efficacy of mirror therapy and virtual reality therapy in alleviating phantom limb pain: A meta-analysis and systematic review. BMJ Military Health 168: 173–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramsay RA 1994 Handbook of pain assessment. General Hospital Psychiatry 16: 302–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rierola-Fochs S, Merchán-Baeza JA, Minobes-Molina E 2022 Effectiveness of graded motor imagery protocol in phantom limb pain in amputed patient: Protocol of a randomized clinical trial. PLOS ONE 17: e0273356:
   Google Scholar
• Rierola-Fochs S, Varela-Vásquez LA, Minobes-Molina E, Merchán-Baeza JA 2021 Development and validation of a graded motor imagery intervention for phantom limb pain in patients with amputations (GraMI protocol): A Delphi study. International Journal of Environmental Research and public health 18: 12240
   Google Scholar
• Robiner WN 2005 Enhancing adherence in clinical research. Contemporary Clinical Trials 26: 59–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothgangel A, Braun S, Winkens B, Beurskens A, Smeets R 2018 Traditional and augmented reality mirror therapy for patients with chronic phantom limb pain (PACT study): Results of a three-group, multicentre single-blind randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 32: 1591–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankevicius A, Wallwork SB, Summers SJ, Hordacre B, Stanton TR 2021 Prevalence and incidence of phantom limb pain, phantom limb sensations and telescoping in amputees: A systematic rapid review. European Journal of Pain 25: 23–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugawara AT, Simis M, Fregni F, Battistella LR 2021 Characterisation of phantom limb pain in Traumatic Lower-limb Amputees. Pain Research and Management 13: 2706731.
   Google Scholar
• Tomczak M, Tomczak E 2014 The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. Trends in Sport Sciences 1: 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Trevelyan EG, Turner WA, Summerfield-Mann L, Robinson N 2016 Acupuncture for the treatment of phantom limb syndrome in lower limb amputees: A randomised controlled feasibility study. Trials 17: 519.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Virani A, Green T, Turin TC 2014 Phantom limb pain: A nursing perspective. Nursing Standard 29: 44–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yanagisawa T, Fukuma R, Seymour B, Yamashita TM, O HK, Hosomi K, Kishima H, Kamitani Y, Saitoh Y 2022 Neurofeedback training without explicit phantom hand movements and hand-like visual feedback to modulate pain: A randomized crossover feasibility trial. The Journal of Pain 23: 2080–2091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar