What we can—and cannot—expect from school-based drug prevention

References

• Caulkins JP, Rydell CP, Schwabe WL, Chiesa J. Mandatory minimum drug sentences: throwing away the key or the taxpayers’ money? MR-827-DPRC. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Drug Policy Research Center, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Caulkins JP, Rydell CP, Everingham SS, Chiesa J, Bushway S. An ounce of prevention, a pound of uncertainty: the cost- effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Drug Policy Research Center, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Caulkins JP, Paddock S, Pacula R, Chiesa J. School-based drug prevention: what kind of drug use does it prevent? MR- 1459-RWJ. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Drug Policy Research Center, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Everingham SS, Rydell CP. Modeling the demand for cocaine. MR-332-ONDCP/A/DPRC. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Drug Policy Research Center, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll C, Zuba D. Modeling the US cocaine epidemic: dynamic trajectories of initiation and demand [Master’s thesis]. Vienna, Austria: Technical University of Vienna, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens DA, Caulkins JP, Tagler G, Feichtinger G. Optimal control of drug epidemics: prevent and treat—but not at the same time. Manage Sci 2000;46:333–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RA, Gerstein DR, Ghadialy R, Choy W, Gfroerer J. Trends in the incidence of drug use in the United States, 1919-1992. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler EB, Cretin S. Discounting of nonmonetary effects. N-1875-HHS. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Drug Policy Research Center, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Botvin EN, Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA 1995;273:1106–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson PL, Bell RM, McGuigan K. Preventing adoles- cent drug use: long-term results of a junior high program. Am J Public Health 1993;83:856–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flay BR, Koepke D, Thomson SJ, Santi S, Best JA, Brown K. Six-year follow-up of the first Waterloo School Smoking Prevention Trial. Am J Public Health 1989; 79:1371–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray D, Davis-Hearn M, Goldman AI, Pirie P, Luepker RV. Four- and five-year follow-up results from four seventh- grade smoking prevention strategies. J Behav Med 1988;11:395–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray D, Pirie P, Luepker RV, Pallonen U. Five- and six-year follow-up results from four seventh-grade smoking prevention strategies. J Behav Med 1989;12:207–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray D, Richards PS, Luepker RV, Johnson CA. The prevention of cigarette smoking in children: two- and three- year follow-up comparisons of four prevention strategies. J Behav Med 1987;10:595–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentz MA, Dwyer JH, MacKinnon DP et al. A multi- community trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse: effects on drug use prevalence. JAMA 1989;261:3259–66.
   Google Scholar
• Perry CL, Williams CL, Veblen-Mortenson S et al. Project Northland: outcomes of a communitywide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. Am J Public Health 1996;86:956–65.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson AV, Kealey KIA, Mann SL, Marek PM, Sarason IG. Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: long-term randomized trial in school-based tobacco use prevention-results on smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1979–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shope JT, Kloska DN, Dielman TE, Maharg R. Long- itudinal evaluation of an enhanced alcohol misuse preven- tion study (AMPS) curriculum for grades six-eight. J School Health 1994;64;160-6.
   Google Scholar
• Spoth R, Redmond C, Lepper H. Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family- focused preventive interven- tions: one- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 1999;13:103–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sussman S, Dent CW, Stacy AW, Hodgson C, Burton D, Flay BR. Project towards no tobacco use: implementation, process and post-test knowledge evaluation. Health Educ Res Theory Pract 1993;8:109–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman MAR. Enforcement swamping: a positive-feed- back mechanism in rates of illicit activity. Math Comp Model 1991;17:65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE. The economics of smoking. In: Newhouse J, Culyer A, editors. The handbook of health economics, Vol. 1B. Cambridge (MA):Harvard University Press, 2000,1539-1627.
   Google Scholar
• Warner KE, Hodgson TA, Carroll CE. Medical costs of smoking in the United States: estimates, their validity, and their implications. Tobacco Control 1999;8:290–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett JC, Miller LS, Rice DP, Max WB. Medical care expenditures attributable to cigarette smoking—United States 1994. MMWR 1994;43:469–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rice D, Kelman S, Miller LS, Dunmeyer S. The economic costs of alcohol and drug abuse and mental illness: 1985. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Health and Aging University of California, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood H, Fountain D, Livermore G. The economic costs of alcohol and drug abuse in the United States 1992. NIH 98-4327. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood HJ, Napolitano DM, Kristiansen PL, Collins JJ. Economic costs to society of alcohol and drug abuse and mental illness: 1980. RTI/2734/00-01FR. Research Trian- gle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Cruze AM, Harwood HJ, Kristiansen PL, Collins JJ, Jones DC. Economic costs to society of alcohol and drug abuse and mental illness: 1977. RTI/1925/00-14F. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen MA. Alcohol, drugs and crime: is ‘crime’ really one- third of the problem? Addiction 1999;94:644–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administra- tion (SAMHSA). Treatment episodes data set (TEDS): 1993-1998. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administra- tion (SAMHSA). Year-end 1999 emergency department data from the Drug Abuse Warning Network. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administra- tion (SAMHSA). Drug Abuse Warning Network Annual Medical Examiner Data, 1998. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). What America’s Users Spend on Illegal Drugs 1988-1998. Washington DC: Office of Programs, Budget, Research and Evaluations, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Boyum DA, Kleiman MAR. Substance abuse policy from a crime-control perspective. In: Wilson JQ, Petersilia J, editors. Crime, 2nd edn. San Francisco: ICS Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. reducing tobacco use: a report of the Surgeon General—executive summary. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of Smoking and Health, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Rydell CP, Everingham SS. Controlling cocaine: supply versus demand programs. MR-331-ONDCP/A/DPRC. San- ta Monica, CA: RAND Drug Policy Research Center, 1994.
   Google Scholar