Cannabis law reform in Western Australia: An opportunity to test theories of marginal deterrence and legitimacy

References

• Lenton S. Evaluation of the WA Cannabis Infringement Notice Scheme—an overview. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005; 24: 297–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenton S. Pot, politics and the press—reflections on cannabis law reform in Western Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 2004; 23: 223–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior J, Swensen G, Migro J, , et al. Implementation of a scheme of prohibition with civil penalties for the personal use of cannabis and other matters. Report of the Working Party on Drug Law Reform to the Minister for Health. the Western Australian Drug Abuse Strategy Office. 2002, Available at: http://www.dao.health.wa.gov.au/drugwestaus/core.html. Accessed 15 April, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Chanteloup F, Lenton S, Fetherston J, Barratt M J. Expected impacts of the Cannabis Infringement Notice Scheme in Western Australia on regular users and their involvement in the cannabis market. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005; 24: 311–319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider A L, Ervin L. Specific deterrence, rational choice, and decision heuristics: applications in juvenile justice. Soc Sci Q 1990; 71: 584–601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider A L. Deterrence and juvenile crime—results from a national policy experiment. Springer Verlag, New York 1990
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs J. Deterrence theory and research. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1985; 33: 87–130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavell S. Extensions of the theory of deterrence. Boston University, Department of Economics, Boston 2000, Available at: http://econ.bu.edu/weiss/Ec337/Shavell/bg22-2e.pdf. Accessed 11 September 2002
   Google Scholar
• Zimring F E, Hawkins G J. Deterrence: the legal threat in crime control. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1973
   Google Scholar
• Mookherjee D, Png I PL. Marginal deterrence in enforcement of law. J Polit Econ 1994; 102: 1039–1066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook P. Research in criminal deterrence: laying the groundwork for the second decade. Crime and justice: an annual review of research, N Morris, M Tonry. University of Chicago Press, Toronto 1980; 201–234
   Google Scholar
• Friedman D D, Sjostrom W. Hanged for a sheep: the economics of marginal deterrence. J Legal Studies 1993; 22: 345–366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler T. Why people obey the law. Yale University Press, New Haven 1990
   Google Scholar
• Sherman L W. Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: a theory of the criminal sanction. J Res Crime Delin 1993; 30: 445–473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber M. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology, 2 vols. G Roth G, C Wittich, E Fischoff. University of California Press, Berkeley 1978, trans
   Google Scholar
• Sarat A. Studying American legal culture: an assessment of survey evidence. Law Soc Rev 1977; 11: 427–488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). 2001 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: detailed findings. AIHW, Canberra 2002
   Google Scholar
• Bowman J, Sanson-Fisher R. Public perceptions of cannabis legislation National Drug Strategy Monograph Series, Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra 1994; 28
   Google Scholar
• Lenton S, Ovenden C. Community attitudes to cannabis use in Western Australia. J Drug Issues 1996; 16: 783–804
   Google Scholar
• Fetherston J, Lenton S. Community attitudes to the proposed Cannabis Infringement Notice scheme in Western Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005; 24: 301–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoun R J, Reuter P. Drug war heresies: learning from other vices, times, and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun R J. Drugs and the law: a psychological analysis of drug prohibition. Psychol Bull 1993; 113: 487–512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob H. Deterrent effects of formal and informal sanctions. Law Policy Q 1980; 2: 61–80
   Google Scholar
• Didcott P, Reilly D, Swift W, Hall W. Long term cannabis users on the New South Wales north coast, et al NDARC Monograph, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Sydney 1997; 30
   Google Scholar
• Lenton S, Bennett M, Heale P. The social impact of a minor cannabis offence under strict prohibition—the case of Western Australia. National Centre for Research into the Prevention of Drug Abuse, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia 1999
   Google Scholar
• Hough M, Warburton H, Few B, et al. A growing market: the domestic cultivation of cannabis. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• Grasmick H G, Green D E. Legal punishment, social disapproval and their internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior. J Crim Law Criminol 1980; 71: 325–335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green D E. Measures of illegal behavior in individual-level deterrence research. J Res Crime Delin 1989; 26: 253–275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams K R, Hawkins R. Perceptual research on general deterrence: a critical review. Law Soc Rev 1986; 20: 545–572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick H G, Bursik R J. Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: extending the deterrence model. Law Soc Rev 1990; 24: 837–861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B G, Fidell L S. Using multivariate statistics3rd edn. Harper Collins, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Barratt M J. Predicting the impact of decriminalising minor cannabis offences on cannabis-obtaining behaviour: marginal deterrence and legitimacy. School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia 2003, Unpublished Honours thesis
   Google Scholar
• Rice P L, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: a health focus. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Australia 1999
   Google Scholar
• Faugier J, Sargeant M. Sampling hard to reach populations. J Adv Nurs 1997; 26: 790–797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar