Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence? The role of evidence in the development and implementation of the Illicit Drug Diversion Initiative

References

• Howard J. Transcript of the Prime Minister The Hon. John Howard MP, doorstop interview. Office of the Prime Minister, Treasury Place, Melbourne 1997
   Google Scholar
• Howard J. Transcript of the Prime Minister The Hon John Howard MP: address at the Salvation Army Drug Rehabilitation Centre, Townsville. Office of the Prime Minister, Townsville 2000
   Google Scholar
• Howard J. Address by the Prime Minister the Hon John Howard MP: launch of the National Illicit Drug Strategy. Office of the Prime Minister, Randwick, Sydney 1997
   Google Scholar
• Howard J. Media release. Illicit drug diversion initiative. Office of the Prime Minister, Canberra 2002
   Google Scholar
• Leicester G. The seven enemies of evidence-based policy. Public Money Manage J 1999; 19: 5–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin V. Competing rationalities: evidence-based health policy?. Evidence-based health policy: problems and possibilities, V Lin, B Gibson. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne 2003; 3–17
   Google Scholar
• Williams N. Evidence and policy: towards a new politico-administrative settlement. Political Q 2002; 73: 86–97
   Google Scholar
• Davies H, Nutley S, Smith P. Editorial. What works? The role of evidence in public sector policy and practice. Public Money Manage J 1999; 19: 3–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmot M. Evidence based policy or policy based evidence? Willingness to take action influences the view of evidence—look at alcohol. BMJ 2006; 328: 906–907
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing. Illicit drug diversion initiative—about diversion, Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/strateg/drugs/illicit/diversion/about.htm (accessed 15 June 2004)
   Google Scholar
• ADCA. Best practice in the diversion of alcohol and other drug offenders. Proceedings of the ADCA diversion forum. Alcohol and other Drugs Council of Australia, Canberra 1996
   Google Scholar
• Morrison S, Burdon M. The role of police in the diversion of minor alcohol and drug-related offenders. Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra 2000, National Campaign Against Drug Abuse Monograph Series: Monograph no. 40
   Google Scholar
• Spooner C, Hall W, Mattick R. A strategic overview of the diversion of drug-related offenders in NSW. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Sydney 2000, NDARC Technical Report no. 96
   Google Scholar
• Spooner C, Hall W, Mattick R. An overview of diversion strategies for Australian drug-related offenders. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001; 20: 281–294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall W. The role of legal coercion in the treatment of offenders with alcohol and heroin problems. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Sydney 1997, NDARC Technical Report no. 44
   Google Scholar
• Health Outcomes International Pty Ltd and Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre. Evaluation of Queensland Illicit Drug Diversion Initiative (QIDDI) Police Diversion Program. Health Outcomes International Pty Ltd, Kent Town, SA 2004, Final Report
   Google Scholar
• Bull M. A comparative review of best practice guidelines for the diversion of drug related offenders. Int J Drug Policy 2005; 16: 223–234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Outcomes International Pty Ltd in association with Catherine Spooner Consulting, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre and Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre. Evaluation of Council of Australian Governments' initiative on illicit drugs. Vol. 1. Executive summary. Department of Finance and Administration, Canberra 2002
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing. Illicit drug diversion initiative—national principles, Available at: http://www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/strateg/drugs/illicit/diversion/principles.htm (accessed 15 June 2004)
   Google Scholar
• Roberts L, Indermaur D. Timely intervention or trapping minnows? The potential for a range of net-widening effects in Australian drug diversion initiatives. Psychiatry Psychol Law 2006; 13: 220–231
   Google Scholar
• Bull M. Just treatment: a review of international programs for the diversion of drug related offenders from the criminal justice system. School of Justice Studies, QUT, Brisbane 2003
   Google Scholar
• ADCA. Policy positions of the Alcohol and other Drugs Council of Australia: diversion. Alcohol and Other Drugs Council of Australia, Canberra 2003
   Google Scholar
• Heale P, Lang E. A process evaluation of the CREDIT (court referral and evaluation for drug intervention and treatment) pilot programme. Drug Alcohol Rev 2001; 20: 223–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Callaghan F, Sonderegger N, Klag S. Drug and crime cycle: evaluating traditional methods versus diversion strategies for drug-related offences. Aust Psychol 2004; 39: 188–200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar