Cue reactivity in dependent amphetamine users: Can monistic conditioning theories advance our understanding of reactivity?

References

• Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services. National Drug Strategy Household Survey: Survey Report, 1995. Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra 1996
   Google Scholar
• Fleming PM, Roberts D. Is the prescription of amphetamine justified as a harm reduction measure?. J Roy Soc Health 1994; 114: 127–131
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darke S, Kelaher M, Hall W, Flaherty B. Characteristics of admissions to residential drug treatment agencies in New South Wales, 1988–92: I. Illicit drug problems. Drug Alcohol Rev 1996; 15: 127–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klee H, Morris J. Factors that lead young amphetamine misusers to seek help: implications for drug prevention and harm reduction. Drugs: Educ Prev Pol 1994; 1: 289–297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan P, Beck J. The legacy and the paradox: hidden contexts of methamphetamine use in the United States. Amphetamine misuse: international perspectives on current trends, H Klee. Harwood Academic Publishers, The Netherlands 1997; 135–162, In
   Google Scholar
• Hando J, Topp L, Hall W. Amphetamine-related harms and treatment preferences of regular amphetamine users in Sydney, Australia. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997; 46: 105–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan CD, Husch JA, Bieleman B. The prevention of stimulant misuse. Addict 1994; 89: 1517–1521
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klee H. A new target for behavioural research—amphetamine misuse. Br J Addict 1992; 87: 439–446
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klee H, Morris J. Crime and drug misuse: economic and psychological aspects of the criminal activities of heroin and amphetamine injectors. Addict Res 1994; 1: 377–386
   Google Scholar
• Schuckit MA. The treatment of stimulant dependence. Addiction 1994; 89: 1559–1563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlatt GA, Gordon JR. Relapse prevention: maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviours. Guilford Press, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Rohsenow DJ, Niaura RS, Childress AR, Abrams DB, Monti PM. Cue reactivity in addictive behaviours: theoretical and treatment implications. Int J Addict 1991; 25: 957–993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikler A. Conditioning factors in opiate addiction and relapse. Narcotics, DI Wilner, GG Kassenbaum. McGraw-Hill, New York 1965; 85–100, In
   Google Scholar
• Stewart J, deWit H, Eikelboom R. The role of conditioned and unconditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychol Rev 1984; 91: 251–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel S. Classical conditioning, drug tolerance and drug dependence. Research advances in alcohol and drug problems, Y Israel, FB Glaser, H Kalant, RE Popham, W Schmidt, RG Smart. Plenum Press, New York 1983; 7: 207–246, In
   Google Scholar
• Greeley J, Westbrook RF. Associative learning, drug use and addictive behaviour. Self-control and the addictive behaviours, N Heather, WR Miller, J Greeley. Maxwell Macmillan, Sydney 1991; 127–150, In
   Google Scholar
• Dawe S, Powell J, Richards D, Gossop M, Marks I, Strang J, Gray JA. Does post-withdrawal cue exposure improve outcome in opiate addiction? A controlled trial. Addiction 1993; 88: 1233–1245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond DC, Glautier S. A controlled trial of cue exposure treatment in alcohol dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62: 809–817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti PM, Rohsenow DJ, Rubonis AV, Niaura RS, Sirota AD, Colby SM, Goddard P, Abrams DB. Cue exposure with coping skills treatment for male alcoholics: a preliminary investigation. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61: 1011–1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell JH, Bradley B, Gray JA. Subjective craving for opiates: evaluation of a cue exposure protocol for use with detoxified opiate addicts. Br J Clin Psychol 1992; 32: 39–53
   Google Scholar
• Dawe S, Powell JH. Cue exposure treatment in opiate and cocaine dependence. Addictive behaviour: cue exposure theory and practice, DC Drummond, ST Tiffany, S Glautier, B Remington. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex 1995; 197–209, In
   Google Scholar
• Kranzler HR, Bauer LO. Bromocriptine and cocaine reactivity in cocaine-dependent patients. Br J Addict 1992; 87: 1537–1548
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehrman R, Robbins SJ, Childress AR, O'Brien CP. Conditioned responses to cocaine-related stimuli in cocaine abuse patients. Psychopharmacology 1992; 107: 523–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger SP, Hall S, Mickalian JD, Reid MS, Crawford CA, Delucchi K, Carr K, Hall S. Haloperidol antagonism of cue-elicited cocaine craving. Lancet 1996; 347: 504–508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins SJ, Ehrman RN. Designing studies of drug conditioning in humans. Psychopharmacology 1992; 106: 143–153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darke S, Hall W. Levels and correlates of polydrug use among heroin users and regular amphetamine users. Drug Alcohol Depend 1995; 39: 231–235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall W, Hando J. Route of administration and adverse effects of amphetamine use among young adults in Sydney, Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 1994; 13: 277–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Negrete JC, Emil S. Cue-evoked arousal in cocaine users: a study of variance and predictive value. Drug Alcohol Depend 1992; 30: 187–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avants SK, Margolin A, Kosten TR, Cooney NL. Differences between responders and non-responders to cocaine cues in the laboratory. Addict Behav 1995; 20: 215–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer LO, Kranzler HR. Electroencephalographic activity and mood in cocaine-dependent outpatients: effects of cocaine cue exposure. Biol Psychiatry 1994; 36: 189–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The composite international diagnostic interview—version 1.1. World Health Organization, Geneva 1993
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of the Eysenck personality scales (EPS adult). Hodder & Stoughton, London 1991
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald MK, Cook EW, Lang PJ. Affective judgemental and psychophysiological response: dimensional covariation in the evaluation of pictorial stimuli. J Psychophysiology 1989; 3: 51–64
   Google Scholar
• Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. Emotion, attention and the startle reflex. Psychol Rev 1990; 97: 377–395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp L, Mattick RP, Lovibond PF. The nature of the amphetamine dependence syndrome: appetitive or aversive motivation?. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre Technical Report No. 30. NDARC, Sydney 1996
   Google Scholar
• Haertzen CA, Hickey JE. Addiction Research Centre Inventory (ARCI): Measurement of euphoria and other drug effects. Methods of assessing the reinforcing effects of abused drugs, MA Bozarth. Springer-Verlag, New York 1987, In
   Google Scholar
• Topp L, Lovibond PF. Cue reactivity in amphetamine users. Looking to the future: a second generation of drug research. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Symposium of the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, NDARC Monograph No. 29, L Topp, P Dillon. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Syndey 1997, In
   Google Scholar
• McKetin R, Ward PB, Catts SV, Mattick RP, Bell JR. Changes in auditory selective attention and event-related potentials following oral administration of d-amphetamine in humans. manuscript under review
   Google Scholar
• Dawe S, Gray JA. Craving and drug reward: a comparison of methadone and clonidine in detoxifying opiate addicts. Drug Alcohol Depend 1995; 39: 207–212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toates F. Comparing motivational systems—an incentive motivation perspective. Appetite: neural and behavioural bases, CR Legg, D Booth. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1994; 305–327, In
   Google Scholar
• Bird KD. Simultaneous contrast testing procedures for multivariate experiments. Multivariate Behavioural Res 1975; 10: 343–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien RG, Kaiser MK. MANOVA method for analysing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. Psychol Bull 1985; 197: 316–333
   Google Scholar
• Glautier S, Remington B. The form of responses to drug cues. Addictive behaviour: cue exposure theory and practice, DC Drummond, ST Tiffany, S Glautier, B Remington. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex 1995; 21–46, In
   Google Scholar
• Glautier S, Tiffany ST. Methodological issues in cue reactivity research. Addictive behaviour: cue exposure theory and practice, DC Drummond, ST Tiffany, S Glautier, B Remington. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex 1995; 75–97, In
   Google Scholar
• Smith DE, Buxton ME, Dammann G. Amphetamine abuse and sexual dysfunction: clinical and research considerations. Amphetamine use, misuse and abuse: proceedings of the national amphetamine conference, 1978, DE Smith, DR Wesson, ME Buxton, RB Seymour, JT Ungereider, JP Morgan, AJ Mandell, G Jara. GK Hall & Co., Boston 1979, In
   Google Scholar
• Berridge KC, Robinson TE. The mind of an addicted brain: neural sensitization of wanting versus liking. Curr Directions Psychol Sci 1995; 4: 71–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitisation theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 1993; 18: 247–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heather N, Greeley J. Cue exposure in the treatment of drug dependence: the potential of a new method for preventing relapse. Drug Alcohol Rev 1990; 9: 155–168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiffany ST. A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behaviour: role of automatic and non-automatic processes. Psychol Rev 1990; 97: 147–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffany ST. A critique of contemporary urge and craving research: methodological, psychometric and theoretical issues. Adv Behav Res Ther 1992; 14: 123–139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffany ST. Potential functions of classical conditioning in drug addiction. Addictive behaviour: cue exposure theory and practice, DC Drummond, ST Tiffany, S Glautier, B Remington. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex 1995; 47–71, In
   Google Scholar