Conceptualizing business-to-thing interactions – A sociomaterial perspective on the Internet of Things

References

• Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language. Towns, buildings, constructions . New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, S. (2010). Viewing systems as services: A fresh approach in the IS field. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 26 (1), 195–224.
   Google Scholar
• Atzori, L. , Iera, A. , & Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks , 54 (15), 2787–2805.10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society , 28 (3), 801–831.10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, A. , Dumas, M. , & Ter Hofstede, A. H. M. (2005). Service interaction patterns. In D. Hutchison , W. M. P. van der Aalst , B. Benatallah , F. Casati , F. Curbera (Eds.), Business process management (pp. 302–318). Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/11538394
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg . (2014). Uber integrates app with starbucks, opentable to expand. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-08-20/uber-integrates-app-with-starbucks-opentable-to-expand.html
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg . (2015). Exclusive: Google is developing its own Uber competitor. Retrieved March 2, 2015, from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-02/exclusive-google-and-uber-are-going-to-war-over-taxis
   Google Scholar
• Boos, D. , Guenter, H. , Grote, G. , & Kinder, K. (2013). Controllable accountabilities: The Internet of Things and its challenges for organisations. Behaviour & Information Technology , 32 (5), 449–467.10.1080/0144929X.2012.674157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgia, E. (2014). The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. Computer Communications , 54 , 1–31.10.1016/j.comcom.2014.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucherer, E. , & Uckelmann, D. (2011). Business models for the Internet of Things. In D. Uckelmann , M. Harrison , & F. Michahelles (Eds.), Architecting the Internet of Things (pp. 253–277). Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-19157-2
   Google Scholar
• Carter, C. R. , Kaufmann, L. , & Michel, A. (2007). Behavioral supply management: A taxonomy of judgment and decision-making biases. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 37 (8), 631–669.10.1108/09600030710825694
   Google Scholar
• Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. , Galliers, R. D. , Henfridsson, O. , Newell, S. , & Vidgen, R. (2014). The sociomateriality of information systems: Current status and future directions. MIS Quarterly , 38 (3), 809–830.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chui, M. , Löffler, M. , & Roberts, R. (2010). The Internet of Things. McKinsey Quarterly , 47 (2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 20 (1), 37–46.10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrunchBase . (2014). CrunchBase – The world’s most comprehensive dataset of startup activity and it’s accessible to everyone. Retrieved February 3, 2015, from https://www.crunchbase.com/
   Google Scholar
• Denning, P. J. (1992). The science of computing: Work is a closed-loop process. American Scientist , 80 (4), 314–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, P. J. , & Medina-Mora, R. (1995). Completing the loops. Interfaces , 25 (3), 42–57.10.1287/inte.25.3.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkman, R. M. , Sprenkels, B. , Peeters, T. , & Janssen, A. (2015). Business models for the Internet of Things. International Journal of Information Management , 35 (6), 672–678.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECT News Network . (2015). TechNewsWorld: All tech – All the time. Retrieved February 7, 2015, from http://www.technewsworld.com/
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin , 76 (5), 378–382.10.1037/h0031619
   Google Scholar
• Gartner . (2014). Gartner says the Internet of Things installed base will grow to 26 billion units by 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2014, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2636073
   Google Scholar
• Gaskin, J. , Berente, N. , Lyytinen, K. , & Youngjin, Y. O. O. (2014). Toward generalizable sociomaterial inquiry: A computational approach for zooming in and out of sociomaterial routines. MIS Quarterly , 38 (3), 849–871.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerts, G. L. , & O’Leary, D. E. (2014). A supply chain of things: The EAGLET ontology for highly visible supply chains. Decision Support Systems , 63 , 3–22.10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkuhl, G. (2005). Beyond communication loops – Multi-responsive actions in business processes. Systems, Signs & Actions , 3 (1), 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly , 30 (3), 611–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S. , & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly , 37 (2), 337–356.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S. , Lehmann, D. R. , & Stuart, J. A. (2004). Valuing customers. Journal of Marketing Research , 41 (1), 7–18.10.1509/jmkr.41.1.7.25084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2014). A matter of life and death: Exploring conceptualisations of sociomateriality in the context of critical care. MIS Quarterly , 38 (3), 895–925.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautz, K. , & Jensen, T. B. (2013). Sociomateriality at the royal court of IS. Information and Organization , 23 (1), 15–27.10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortuem, G. , Kawsar, F. , Fitton, D. , & Sundramoorthy, V. (2010). Smart objects as building blocks for the Internet of things. IEEE Internet Computing , 14 (1), 44–51.10.1109/MIC.2009.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics , 33 (1), 159–174.10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laya, A. , Wang, K. , Widaa, A. A. , Alonso-Zarate, J. , Markendahl, J. , & Alonso, L. (2014). Device-to-device communications and small cells: Enabling spectrum reuse for dense networks. IEEE Wireless Communications , 21 (4), 98–105.10.1109/MWC.2014.6882301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization , 23 (2), 59–76.10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. , Hou, M. , Liu, H. , & Liu, Y. (2012). Towards a theoretical framework of strategic decision, supporting capability and information sharing under the context of Internet of Things. Information, Technology & Management , 13 (4), 205–216.10.1007/s10799-012-0121-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, J. , Buckalew, L. , & Chung, G. (2015). Internet of Things in logistics. Retrieved October 24, 2015, from http://www.dpdhl.com/content/dam/dpdhl/presse/pdf/2015/DHLTrendReport_Internet_of_things.pdf
   Google Scholar
• March, S. T. , & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems , 15 (4), 251–266.10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, F. , & Floerkemeier, C. (2010). From the internet of computers to the Internet of Things. In K. Sachs , I. Petrov , & P. Guerrero (Eds.), From active data management to event-based systems and more (pp. 242–259). Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-17226-7
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute . (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/disruptive_technologies
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. (2015). Beyond sociomaterial: An alternative approach to theorizing about digital artifacts. In A. S. Lee , A. Dennis , S. Paul , P. Pavlou , & C. Saunders (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–10). San Juan: AIS.
   Google Scholar
• Medina-Mora, R. , Winograd, T. , Flores, R. , & Flores, F. (1992). The action workflow approach to workflow management technology. In M. Mantel , & R. Baecker (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 281–288). Toronto, ON: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikalsen, M. (2014). Methodological considerations in the study of sociomateriality. In M. Avital , J. M. Leimeister , & U. Schultze (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-second European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–15). Tel Aviv: AIS.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. C. , & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research , 2 (3), 192–222.10.1287/isre.2.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutch, A. (2013). Sociomateriality – Taking the wrong turning? Information and Organization , 23 (1), 28–40.10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahm, A. , Rao, S. S. , Solis-Galvan, L. , & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2002). The Q-Sort method: Assessing reliability and construct validity of questionnaire items. At a pre-testing stage. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods , 1 (1), 114–125.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, B. , & Mutum, D. S. (2012). A review of customer relationship management: Successes, advances, pitfalls and futures. Business Process Management Journal , 18 (3), 400–419.10.1108/14637151211232614
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. C. , Varshney, U. , & Muntermann, J. (2013). A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems , 22 (3), 336–359.10.1057/ejis.2012.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, D. E. (2013). ‘Big data’, the ‘Internet of Things’ and the ‘Internet of Signs’. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management , 20 (1), 53–65.10.1002/isaf.v20.1
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2015). IoTH: The Internet of Things and humans – O’Reilly radar. Retrieved January 23, 2015, from http://radar.oreilly.com/2014/04/ioth-the-internet-of-things-and-humans.html
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies , 28 (9), 1435–1448.10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. , & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals , 2 (1), 433–474.10.1080/19416520802211644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. , & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). Spotlight on managing the Internet of Things. Harvard Business Review , 92 (11), 65–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. , & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How smart and connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review , 93 (10), 96–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, Y. (2011). Based on the Internet of Things, Shanghai logistics zones development strategies. In Q. M. Hu (Ed.), 2011 International Conference on Education Science and Management Engineering (pp. 452–454). Beijing: Scientific Research Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rajesh, R. , Pugazhendhi, S. , & Ganesh, K. (2011). Towards taxonomy architecture of knowledge management for third-party logistics service provider. Benchmarking: An International Journal , 18 (1), 42–68.10.1108/14635771111109814
   Google Scholar
• Rosemann, M. (2014). The Internet of Things – New digital capital in the hand of customers. Business Transformation Journal , 9 (1), 6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. V. , & Orlikowski, W. J. (2013). Sociomateriality – taking the wrong turning? A response to Mutch. Information and Organization , 23 (2), 77–80.10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. V. , & Orlikowski, W. J. (2014). Entanglements in practice: Performing anonymity through social media. MIS Quarterly , 38 (3), 873–893.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shollo, A. , & Kautz, K. (2010). Towards an understanding of business intelligence. In M. Rosemann , P. Green , & F. Rohde (Eds.), 21th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–10). Brisbane: AIS.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1935). Technique of factor analysis. Nature , 136 , 297.10.1038/136297b0
   Google Scholar
• Strbac, G. (2008). Demand side management: Benefits and challenges. Energy Policy , 36 (12), 4419–4426.10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations. Plans and situated actions . New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundmaeker, H. , Guillemin, P. , Friess, P. , & Woelfle, S. (2010). Vision and challenges for realising the Internet of Things. CERP-IoT Cluster of European Research Projects on the Internet of Things. European Commission – Information Society and Media DG, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• TechCrunch . (2015). TechCrunch. Retrieved February 15, 2015, from http://techcrunch.com/
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. M. , & Watson, R. T. (2002). Q-sorting and MIS research: A primer. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 8 (1), 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Tsatsou, P. , Elaluf-Calderwood, S. , & Liebenau, J. (2010). Towards a taxonomy for regulatory issues in a digital business ecosystem in the EU. Journal of Information Technology , 25 (3), 288–307.10.1057/jit.2009.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turber, S. , vom Brocke, J. , Gassmann, O. , & Fleisch, E. (2014). Designing business models in the era of Internet of Things. In D. Hutchison , T. Kanade , J. Kittler (Eds.), Advancing the impact of design science: Moving from theory to practice (pp. 17–31). Cham: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8
   Google Scholar
• Uber . (2014). Your ride. Your music. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from https://get.uber.com/spotify/
   Google Scholar
• Uckelmann, D. , Harrison, M. , & Michahelles, F. (Eds.). (2011). Architecting the Internet of Things . Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M. P. , Ter Hofstede, A. , Kiepuszewski, B. , & Barros, A. P. (2003). Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases , 14 (1), 5–51.10.1023/A:1022883727209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermesan, O. , & Fries, P. (2014). Internet of Things – from research and development to market deployment . Aalborg: River Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• von Briel, F. , & Schneider, C. (2012). A taxonomy of web-based inbound open innovation initiatives. In A. Schwarz , T. Stafford , & R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems (1–10). Washington, DC: AIS.
   Google Scholar
• Werth, J. C. , & Boeert, P. (2013). Co-investment networks of business angels and the performance of their start-up investments. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing , 5 (3), 240–256.10.1504/IJEV.2013.055292
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund, M. , Leminen, S. , & Rajahonka, M. (2014). Designing business models for the Internet of Things. Technology Innovation Management Review , 4 (7), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. , Chatterjee, S. , & Rossi, M. (2008). Design of emerging digital services: A taxonomy. European Journal of Information Systems , 17 (5), 505–517.10.1057/ejis.2008.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar