Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals

References

• Alvesson, M. , & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review , 36 (2), 247–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H. , & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 8 (1), 19–32.10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Avison, D. E. , Dwivedi, Y. K. , Fitzgerald, G. , & Powell, P. (2008). The beginnings of a new era: Time to reflect on 17 years of the ISJ. Information Systems Journal , 18 (1), 5–21.10.1111/isj.2008.18.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandara, W. , Furtmuller, E. , Gorbacheva, E. , Miskon, S. , & Beekhuyzen, J. (2015). Achieving rigour in literature reviews: Insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 37 , article 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandara, W. , Miskon, S. , & Fielt, E. (2011). A systematic, tool-supported method for conducting literature reviews in information systems. Proceedings of the19th European Conference on Information Systems , Helsinki, Finland, Paper 221.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, L. A. , & Oxman, A. D. (2008). Overviews of reviews. In J. P. T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (pp. 607–631). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470712184
   Google Scholar
• Boell, S. K. , & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology , 30 (2), 161–173.10.1057/jit.2014.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A. , Papaioannou, D. , & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review . London: Sage Publications Ltd..
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J. A. (2016). Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews. Research Integrity and Peer Review , 1 , article 12.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. , Pound, P. , Morgan, M. , Daker-White, G. , Britten, N. , Pill, R. , … Donovan, J. (2011). Evaluating meta-ethnography: Systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment , 15 (43), 1–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research . New York, NY : Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Y. E. , & Reich, B. H. (2007). IT alignment: What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology , 22 (4), 297–315.10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiasson, M. , Germonprez, M. , & Mathiassen, L. (2009). Pluralist action research: A review of the information systems literature. Information Systems Journal , 19 (1), 31–54.10.1111/isj.2008.19.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M. (1982). Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Review of Educational Research , 52 (2), 291–302.10.3102/00346543052002291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge, Technology & Policy , 1 (1), 104–126.10.1007/BF03177550
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd..
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M. , & Hedges, L. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper , L. Hedges , & J. Valentine (Eds.), The Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 3–16). New York, NY : Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• DeLone, W. H. , & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research , 3 (1), 60–95.10.1287/isre.3.1.60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vaujany, F. X. , Walsh, I. , & Mitev, N. (2011). An historically grounded critical analysis of research articles in IS. European Journal of Information Systems , 20 (4), 395–417.10.1057/ejis.2011.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, S. (2011). Transdisciplinary perspectives on environmental sustainability: A resource base and framework for IT-enabled business transformation. MIS Quarterly , 35 (1), 197–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B. N. , Johnson, C. D. , & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine , 5 (3), 101–117.10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2001). Doing a literature search: A comprehensive guide for the social sciences . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T. & Green, S. (Eds.) (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series . Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T. , & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 . Retrieved from www.handbook.cochrane.org
   Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R. A. , & Klein, H. K. (2006). Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline. In King, J. L. , & Lyytinen, K. (Eds.), Information systems: The state of the field (Chapter 5, pp. 71–146). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Houy, C. , Fettke, P. , & Loos, P. (2015). Stylized facts as an instrument for literature review and cumulative information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 37 , article 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F. , & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research , 15 (9), 1277–1288.10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyaraj, A. , Rottman, J. W. , & Lacity, M. C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology , 21 (1), 1–23.10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, O. , & Gatrell, C. (2014). The future of writing and reviewing for IJMR. International Journal of Management Reviews , 16 (3), 249–264.10.1111/ijmr.2014.16.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappos, A. , & Rivard, S. (2008). A three-perspective model of culture, information systems, and their development and use. MIS Quarterly , 32 (3), 601–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. R. , & He, J. (2005). Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 16 (1), 665–686.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B. , & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Retrieved from http://www.dur.ac.uk/ebse/resources/guidelines/Systematic-reviews-5-8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kitsiou, S. , Paré, G. , & Jaana, M. (2015). Effects of home telemonitoring interventions on patients with chronic heart failure: An overview of systematic reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 17 (3), e63.10.2196/jmir.4174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics , 33 (1), 159–174.10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. P. , Hart, R. I. , Watson, R. M. , & Rapley, T. (2015). Qualitative synthesis in practice: Some pragmatics of meta-ethnography. Qualitative Research , 15 (3), 334–350.10.1177/1468794114524221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, D. E. , & Kayworth, T. (2006). A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly , 30 (2), 357–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac, D. , Colquhoun, H. , & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science , 5 , article 69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, Y. , & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science: International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline , 9 , 181–212.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, A. , Altman, D. G. , Tetzlaff, J. , Mulrow, C. , Gøtzsche, P. C. , Ioannidis, J. P. , … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine , 151 (4), W-65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. A. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. , & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B. , Moody, G. D. , Gaskin, J. , Galletta, D. F. , Humpherys, S. L. , Barlow, J. B. , & Wilson, D. W. (2013). Evaluating journal quality and the association for information systems senior scholars’ journal basket via bibliometric measures: Do expert journal assessments add value? MIS Quarterly , 37 (4), 993–1012.10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machi, L. A. , & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The literature review: Six steps to success . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.10.1093/OBO_dataset_home
   Google Scholar
• Mignerat, M. , & Rivard, S. (2009). Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. Journal of Information Technology , 24 (4), 369–391.10.1057/jit.2009.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D. , Liberati, A. , Tetzlaff, J. , Altman, D. G. , & Prisma Group . (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine , 6 (7), e1000097.10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D. , Shamseer, L. , Clarke, M. , Ghersi, D. , Liberati, A. , Petticrew, M. , … Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews , 4 , article 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noblit, G. W. , & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies (Vol. 11). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412985000
   Google Scholar
• Oates, B. (2011). Evidence-based information systems: A decade later. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems , Helsinki, Finland, Paper 222.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli, C. (2012). A critical realist guide to developing theory with systematic literature reviews . Working paper available at SSRN 2115818.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli, C. , & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts Working Papers on Information Systems , 10 , 26.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz de Guinea, A. , & Paré, G. (2018). What type of literature review should I conduct?. In R. Galliers , & M.-K. Stein (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (Chapter 5, pp. 73–82). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz de Guinea, A. , Webster, J. , & Staples, D. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management , 49 (6), 301–308.10.1016/j.im.2012.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman, A. D. (1994). Checklists for review articles. British Medical Journal , 309 (6955), 648–651.10.1136/bmj.309.6955.648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxman, A. D. , & Guyatt, G. H. (1988). Guidelines for reading literature reviews. Canadian Medical Association Journal , 138 (8), 697–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palvia, P. , Mao, E. , Salam, A. F. , & Soliman, K. S. (2003). Management information systems research: What’s there in a methodology? Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 11 (1), article 16.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, G. , & Kitsiou, S. (2017). Methods for literature review. In F. Lau , & C. Kuziemsky (Eds.), Handbook of eHealth evaluation: An evidence-based approach (Chapter 9, pp. 151–173).Victoria, BC: University of Victoria Library Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, G. , Tate, M. , Johnstone, D. , & Kitsiou, S. (2016). Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews. European Journal of Information Systems , 25 (6), 493–508.10.1057/s41303-016-0020-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré, G. , Trudel, M. C. , Jaana, M. , & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management , 52 (2), 183–199.10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. , Greenhalgh, T. , Harvey, G. , & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy , 10 (suppl 1), 21–34.10.1258/1355819054308530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petersen, K. , Feldt, R. , Mujtaba, S. , & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. EASE , 8 , 68–77.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, K. , Vakkalanka, S. , & Kuzniarz, L. (2015). Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology , 64 , 1–18.10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter, S. , DeLone, W. H. , & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems , 17 (3), 236–263.10.1057/ejis.2008.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G. , & Ives, B. (2005). IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly , 29 (4), 747–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, C. , & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development , 33 (3), 534–548.10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, C. , Grignon, J. , Steven, R. , Guitart, D. , & Byrne, J. (2015). Publishing not perishing: How research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews. Studies in Higher Education , 40 (10), 1756–1769.10.1080/03075079.2014.914907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S. , & Folger, J. P. (1981). Modes of observation and the validation of interaction analysis schemes. Small Group Behavior , 12 (4), 477–493.10.1177/104649648101200406
   Google Scholar
• Rivard, S. (2014). Editor’s comments: The ions of theory construction. MIS Quarterly , 38 (2), iii–xiv.
   Google Scholar
• Robey, D. , Im, G. , & Wareham, J. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: Assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems , 9 (9), 497–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. , Manning, J. , & Denyer, D. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. The Academy of Management Annals , 2 (1), 475–515.10.1080/19416520802211651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (2012). Toward a richer diversity of genres in information systems research: New categorization and guidelines. European Journal of Information Systems , 21 (5), 469–478.10.1057/ejis.2012.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (2014). What literature review is not: Diversity, boundaries and recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems , 23 (3), 241–255.10.1057/ejis.2014.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schryen, G. (2013). Revisiting IS business value research: What we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. European Journal of Information Systems , 22 (2), 139–169.10.1057/ejis.2012.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schryen, G. , Benlian, A. , Rowe, F. , Gregor, S. , Larsen, K. , Petter, S. , … Yasasin, E. (in press). Literature reviews in IS research: What can be learnt from the past and other fields?. Communications of the Association for Information Systems .
   Google Scholar
• Schryen, G. , Wagner, G. , & Benlian, A. (2015). Theory of knowledge for literature reviews: An epistemological model, taxonomy and empirical analysis of IS literature. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze, U. (2015). Skirting SLR’s language trap: Reframing the “systematic” vs “traditional” literature review opposition as a continuum. Journal of Information Technology , 30 (2), 180–184.10.1057/jit.2015.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultze, U. , & Leidner, D. E. (2002). Studying knowledge management in information systems research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS Quarterly , 26 (3), 213–242.10.2307/4132331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, B. J. , Grimshaw, J. M. , Wells, G. A. , Boers, M. , Andersson, N. , Hamel, C. , … Bouter, L. M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology , 7 , article 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, B. J. , Hamel, C. , Wells, G. A. , Bouter, L. M. , Kristjansson, E. , Grimshaw, J. , & Boers, M. (2009). AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 62 (10), 1013–1020.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepperd, S. , Lewin, S. , Straus, S. , Clarke, M. , Eccles, M. P. , Fitzpatrick, R. , … Sheikh, A. (2009). Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Medicine , 6 (8), e1000086.10.1371/journal.pmed.1000086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. J. , Dinev, T. , & Xu, H. (2011a). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly , 35 (4), 989–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. , Devane, D. , Begley, C. M. , & Clarke, M. (2011b). Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology , 11 , article 15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvester, A. , Tate, M. , & Johnstone, D. (2013). Beyond synthesis: Re-presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour & Information Technology , 32 (12), 1199–1215.10.1080/0144929X.2011.624633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, M. , Furtmueller, E. , Evermann, J. , & Bandara, W. (2015). Introduction to the special issue: The literature review in information systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 37 , article 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templier, M. , & Paré, G. (2015). A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 37 , article 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, D. , Russell, K. , Becker, L. , Klassen, T. , & Hartling, L. (2010). The evolution of a new publication type: Steps and challenges of producing overviews of reviews. Research Synthesis Methods , 1 (3/4), 198–211.10.1002/jrsm.v1.3/4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review , 4 (3), 356–367.10.1177/1534484305278283
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D. , Denyer, D. , & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management , 14 (3), 207–222.10.1111/bjom.2003.14.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G. , Haefliger, S. , Spaeth, S. , & Wallin, M. W. (2012). Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly , 36 (2), 649–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, M. , & Hulland, J. (2004). The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly , 28 (1), 107–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, R. T. (2001). Introducing MISQ review – a new department in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly , 25 (1), 103–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. , & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly , 26 (2), xiii–xxiii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittemore, R. , & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing , 52 (5), 546–553.10.1111/jan.2005.52.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfswinkel, J. F. , Furtmueller, E. , & Wilderom, C. P. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems , 22 (1), 45–55.10.1057/ejis.2011.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G. , Greenhalgh, T. , & Pawson, R. (2010). Internet-based medical education: A realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Medical Education , 10 , 12.10.1186/1472-6920-10-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. , & Lederer, A. (2009). A meta-analysis of the role of environment-based voluntariness in information technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly , 33 (2), 419–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar