Determinants and heterogeneity of switching costs in IT outsourcing: estimates from firm-level data

References

• Afuah, A. (2001). Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1211–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. W., & Dekker, H. C. (2005). Management control for market transactions: The relation between transaction characteristics, incomplete contract design, and subsequent performance. Management Science, 51(12), 1734–1752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, S., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organization Science, 8(3), 235–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L., Beckman, S. L., & Epple, D. (1990). The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 36(2), 140–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterisk, C. U. (2016). Peer analysis 2016. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F8phEAIgAks8DubcS96uYjqy4X0rLR4f
   Google Scholar
• Barthélemy, J. (2001). The hidden costs of IT outsourcing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch, B., & Grace, D. (2008). Technical guide: Credit union regulation and supervision. Washington, DC: World Council of Credit Unions.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brush, T., Dangol, R., & O’Brien, J. (2012). Customer capabilities, switching costs, and bank performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13), 1499–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A., Gelbach, J., & Miller, D. (2011). Robust inference with multiway clustering. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29(2), 238–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. (1997). Paying customers to switch. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6(4), 877–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Bharadwaj, A. (2009). An empirical analysis of contract structures in it outsourcing. Information Systems Research, 20(4), 484–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, K. J., & Masten, S. E. (1988). Mitigating contractual hazards: Unilateral options and contract length. RAND Journal of Economics, 19(3), 327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CUNA. (2008). 2008 technology & spending report. Madison, WI: Credit Union National Association, Inc. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/cunareport
   Google Scholar
• Currie, W. (2000). The supply-side of IT outsourcing: The trend towards mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30(3/4), 238–254.
   Google Scholar
• Dernovsek, D. (2005). CU data processing looks ahead. Credit Union Magazine, 12, (pp. 61–64), Information Systems Guide.
   Google Scholar
• Dewan, S., & Min, C. (1997). The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Science, 43(12), 1660–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, D., Fan, M., & Zhang, C. (2010). Design and analysis of contracts for software outsourcing. Information Systems Research, 21(1), 93–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, C., Grover, V., & Balakrishnan, N. R. (2009). Business process outsourcing: An event study on the nature of processes and firm valuation. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(5), 442–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzinga, K., & Mills, D. (1998). Switching costs in the wholesale distribution of cigarettes. Southern Economic Journal, 65(2), 282–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, J., & Klemperer, P. (2007). Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. In M. Armstrong, & R. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 3, pp.1967–2072). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Feeny, D., Willcocks, L., & Lacity, M. (2006). Business process outsourcing, knowledge and innovation – A study of enterprise partnership. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information systems outsourcing: Enduring themes, new perspectives and global changes (second ed., pp. 543–581). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fitoussi, D., & Gurbaxani, V. (2012). It outsourcing contracts and performance measurement. Information Systems Research, 23(1), 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, R. H. (1987). Technological revolution and productivity decline: Computer introduction in the financial industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 31(2), 143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, New York: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpatrick, K. (2006). Switching vendors for the right reason. Credit Union Management, 29(6). Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/cumgt2400
   Google Scholar
• Global Services, O. S. F. (2002). The real cost of outsourcing. White Paper. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Gz9BICrurbMJ9UVrvDiVf4-QYkyIDuWI
   Google Scholar
• Gopal, A., Sivaramakrishnan, K., Krishnan, M. S., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2003). Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 49(12), 1671–1683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein, S., Lerner, J., & Stern, S. (2010). The economics of digitization: An agenda for NSF. American Economic Association, Ten Years and Beyond: Economists Answer NSF’s Call for Long-Term Research Agendas, SSRN–ID 1889153.
   Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani, V. (2007). Information systems outsourcing contracts: Theory and evidence. In U. Apte & U. Karmarkar (Eds.), Managing in the information economy (pp. 83–115). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guriev, S., & Kvasov, D. (2005). Contracting on time. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1369–1385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K., Kauffman, R., & Nault, B. (2011). Returns to information technology outsourcing. Information System Research, 22(4), 824–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker, A., & Kretschmer, T. (2010). Outsourcing decisions: The effect of scale economies and market structure. Strategic Organization, 8(2), 155–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R., & Lacity, M. C. (2006). Four stories of information systems insourcing. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information systems outsourcing: enduring themes, new perspectives and global changes (second ed., pp. 303–346). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Q., Saunders, C., & Gebelt, M. (1997). Research report: Diffusion of information systems outsourcing: A reevaluation of influence sources. Information Systems Research, 8(3), 288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (2010). 2010 Credit Union Technology Spending Survey.” Technology@CU, A Technology & Operations Supplement to 2Q10 Credit Union Strategy & Performance, 7–21. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/tech–cu.
   Google Scholar
• Joskow, P. (1987). Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: empirical evidence from coal markets. American Economic Review, 77(1), 168–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. (2002). Exploring relationships in information technology outsourcing: The interaction approach. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, B., Crawford, R., & Alchian, A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2), 297–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemperer, P. (1995). Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. The Review of Economic Studies, 62(4), 515–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacity, M., Willcocks, L., & Feeny, D. (1996). The value of selective IT sourcing. Sloan Management Review, 37, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Leamer, E. E. (1978). Specification searches: Ad hoc inference with nonexperimental data. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Miranda, S., & Kim, Y. (2004). IT outsourcing strategies: Universalistic, contingency, and configurational explanations of success. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 110–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Madhok, A., Plaschka, G., & Verma, R. (2006). Supplier-switching inertia and competitive asymmetry: A demand-side perspective. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 547–576.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, J. (2004). Transformational outsourcing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(2), 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. Z., Gal-Or, E., Kemerer, C. F., & Smith, M. D. (2011). Compatibility and proprietary standards: The impact of conversion technologies in it markets with network effects. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 188–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992a). Determinants of information technology outsourcing: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1), 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. (1992b). Diffusion of information technology outsourcing: Influence sources and the Kodak effect. Information System Research, 3(4), 334–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, D., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2012). An empirical analysis of the contractual and information structures of business process outsourcing relationships. Information Systems Research, 23(3), 618–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michell, V., & Fitzgerald, G. (1997). The IT outsourcing market-place: Vendors and their selection. Journal of Information Technology, 12, 223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCUA (2004). National credit union administration fourth quarter call report. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1BuLDoiBGnDRNkdif9V_Kfvvf0iiJldDz
   Google Scholar
• NCUA (2007). Evaluating third party relationships. Supervisory Letter, 07-01. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/sl0701
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 63, 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, Y., & Stango, V. (2005). Supplier switching and outsourcing. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper. (pp. 2005–2022).
   Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., & Lacity, M. (2006). The normative value of transaction cost economics: What managers have learned about TCE principles in the IT context. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, & J. Dibbern (Eds), Information systems outsourcing: Enduring themes, new perspectives and global changes (second ed., pp. 259–282). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, E., & Van Walleghem, J. (2004). Technology outsourcing: A community bank perspective. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City – Financial Industry Perspectives, 4, 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (1994). Data network productivity and competitive behavior: The case of the french commercial banks. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 46(1), 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayles, W. W. (2002). Small credit union data processors: Survey results. Filene Research Institute Special Report. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1S1LJkOnxFp5Zn5lQrCh6X72599bqfr0s
   Google Scholar
• Shum, M. (2004). Does advertising overcome brand loyalty? Evidence from the breakfast-cereals market. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 13(2), 241–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sia, S. K., Lim, W. K., & Periasamy, K. P. (2010). Switching IT outsourcing suppliers: enhancing transition readiness. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(1), 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susarla, A. (2012). Contractual flexibility, rent seeking, and renegotiation design: An empirical analysis of information technology outsourcing contracts. Management Science, 58(7), 1388–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susarla, A., Subramanyam, R., & Karhade, P. (2010). Contractual provisions to mitigate holdup: Evidence from Information Technology outsourcing. Information Systems Research, 21(1), 37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2003). Supplier surfing: Competition and consumer behavior in subscription markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2), 223–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanneste, B., & Puranam, P. (2010). Repeated interactions and contractual detail: Identifying the learning effect. Organization Science, 21(1), 186–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, M., & Feeny, D. (2008). Outsourcing: From cost management to innovations and business value. California Management Review, 50(4), 127–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigelt, C., & Sarkar, M. (2009). Learning from supply-side agents: The impact of technology solution providers’ experiential diversity on clients’ innovation adoption. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 37–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitten, D., & Leidner, D. (2006). Bringing IT back: An analysis of the decision to backsource or switch vendors. Decision Sciences, 37(4), 605–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitten, D., & Wakefield, R. (2006). Measuring switching costs in IT outsourcing services. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(3), 219–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar