A critical perspective of engagement in online health communities

References

• Alcadipani, R., & Hassard, J. (2010). Actor-network theory, organizations and critique: Towards a politics of organizing. Organization, 17(4), 419–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (2003). Studying management critically. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. M., & Funnell, M. M. (2005). Patient empowerment: Reflections on the challenge of fostering the adoption of a new paradigm. Patient Education and Counseling, 57(2), 153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arazy, O., & Gellatly, I. R. (2012). Corporate wikis: The effects of owners’ motivation and behavior on group members’ engagement. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(3), 87–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1989). Participatory action research and action science compared: A commentary. American Behavioral Scientist, 32(5), 612–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashenden, S., & Owen, D. (1999). Foucault contra Habermas: Recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M., Oborn, E., & Orlikowski, W. (2016). Creating value in online communities: The sociomaterial configuring of strategy, platform, and stakeholder engagement. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 704–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basden, A. (2002). The critical theory of Herman Dooyeweerd? Journal of Information Technology, 17(4), 257–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basden, A. (2011). Enabling a Kleinian integration of interpretivist and socio-critical IS research: The contribution of Dooyeweerd's philosophy. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(4), 477–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., & Morris, J. S. (2009). MyFaceTube politics: Social networking web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 24–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bernabeo, E., & Holmboe, E. S. (2013). Patients, providers, and systems need to acquire a specific set of competencies to achieve truly patient-centered care. Health Affairs, 32(2), 250–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (1997). Developing empirical research: An example informed by a Habermasian approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(5), 622–648.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, doi:10.1177/1094670511411703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke, C. (2002). What does it mean to be ‘critical’in IS research? Journal of Information Technology, 17(2), 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brundidge, J., & Rice, R. E. (2009). Political engagement online: Do the information rich get richer and the like-minded more similar. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 144–156).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2010). Mobile communication and civic life: Linking patterns of use to civic and political engagement. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 536–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cataldi, M., Di Caro, L., & Schifanella, C. (2010). Emerging topic detection on Twitter based on temporal and social terms evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2001). Doing critical IS research: The question of methodology. In Qualitative research in IS: Issues and trends (pp. 141–162). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2005). Basic assumptions of the critical research perspectives in information systems. In Handbook of critical information systems research: Theory and application (pp. 19–46).
   Google Scholar
• Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2011). Doing critical information systems research–Arguments for a critical research methodology. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(4), 440–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapello, E., & Fairclough, N. (2002). Understanding the new management ideology: A transdisciplinary contribution from critical discourse analysis and new sociology of capitalism. Discourse & Society, 13(2), 185–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S.-C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 601–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M., Feezell, J. T., & Guerrero, M. (2012). Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1535–1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter, K. S., Gummerus, J., Liljander, V., Weman, E., & Pihlström, M. (2012). Customer engagement in a Facebook brand community. Management Research Review, 35(9), 857–877.
   Google Scholar
• Cukier, W., Bauer, R., & Middleton, C. (2004). Applying Habermas’ validity claims as a standard for critical discourse analysis. In Information systems research (pp. 233–258). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cukier, W., Ngwenyama, O., Bauer, R., & Middleton, C. (2009). A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: Preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis. Information Systems Journal, 19(2), 175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetjen, U., & Powell, J. A. (2016). Informational and emotional elements in online support groups: A Bayesian approach to large-scale content analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(3), 508–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7(2), 191–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiris, G. (2006). The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: Concepts and challenges. Patient Education and Counseling, 62(2), 178–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making research: Concepts, methods, and results to date. The annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dallas, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Dessart, L., Veloutsou, C., & Morgan-Thomas, A. (2015). Consumer engagement in online communities: A social media perspective. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 24(1), 28–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA, 267(16), 2221–2226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction)(pp. 258–284, Vol. 2). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. USA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2005). Peripheral vision: Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism. Organization Studies, 26(6), 915–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2017). CDA as dialectical reasoning. In J. Flowerdew, & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 13–25). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2002). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., & Blanchot, M. (1989). Maurice Blanchot: The thought from outside (Vol. 13). New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2003). Ideology: A very short introduction (Vol. 95). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Funnell, M. M., & Anderson, R. M. (2003). Patient empowerment: A look back, a look ahead. The Diabetes Educator, 29(3), 454–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galegher, J., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1998). Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 15(4), 493–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., & Shaw, A. (2013). Digitally savvy citizenship: The role of internet skills and engagement in young adults’ political participation around the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(2), 115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, D. (2003). Ideology (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heinonen, K. (2018). Positive and negative valence influencing online communities. Journal of Service Theory & Practice, 28(2), 147–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heverin, T., & Zach, L. (2012). Use of microblogging for collective sense-making during violent crises: A study of three campus shootings. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 34–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschheim, R., Klein, H. K., & Lyytinen, K. (1995). Information systems development and data modeling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howcroft, D., & Trauth, E. M. (2005). Handbook of critical information systems research: Theory and application. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2013). Putting twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 273–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. R. (1994). The symbolic interaction metaphor and leisure: Critical challenges. Leisure Studies, 13(2), 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Klecuń, E. (2004). Conducting critical research in information systems: Can actor-network theory help? In Information Systems Research (pp. 259–274). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K. (2009). Critical social is research today: A reflection of past accomplishments and current challenges. In Critical managementperspectives on information systems (pp. 249–272).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Huynh, M. Q. (2004). The critical social theory of Jürgen Habermas and its implications for IS research. In Social theory and philosophy for information systems (pp. 157–237).
   Google Scholar
• Laurance, J., Henderson, S., Howitt, P. J., Matar, M., Al Kuwari, H., Edgman-Levitan, S., & Darzi, A. (2014). Patient engagement: Four case studies that highlight the potential for improved health outcomes and reduced costs. Health Affairs, 33(9), 1627–1634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. trans. Robert Bononno. Cambridge: Mass. Perseus.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1988). Information systems as rational discourse: An application of Habermas’s theory of communicative action. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 4(1–2), 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, K. (2005). Doing critical research in information systems: A case of theory and practice not informing each other. Information Systems Journal, 15(2), 85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D., & Klein, H. K. (2011). A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 17–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng’ambi, D. (2008). A critical discourse analysis of students’ anonymous online postings.
   Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama, O. K. (1991). The critical social theory approach to information systems: Problems and challenges. In Information systems research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions (pp. 267–280).
   Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama, O. K., & Lee, A. S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21, 145–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, O., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2013). Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. Mis Quarterly, 37(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, O., Eom, C., & Rao, H. R. (2015). Research note—role of social media in social change: An analysis of collective sense making during the 2011 Egypt revolution. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 210–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, P., Yu, T., Jr., & de Ruyter, K. (2006). Understanding consumer engagement in services. Paper presented at the Advancing Theory, Maintaining Relevance ANZMAC 2006 Conference, Queensland University of Technology, School of Advertising, Marketing and Public Relations, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, C. E., Donthu, N., MacElroy, W. H., & Wydra, D. (2011). How to foster and sustain engagement in virtual communities. California Management Review, 53(4), 80–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, M., Latella, L., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2016). Beliefs about childhood vaccination in the United States: Political ideology, false consensus, and the illusion of uniqueness. PloS One, 11(7), e0158382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambe, P. (2012). Critical discourse analysis of collaborative engagement in Facebook postings. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, S., Kim, S. S., & Morris, J. G. (2014). The central role of engagement in online communities. Information Systems Research, 25(3), 528–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, H., & Robinson, B. (2007). The mysterious case of the missing paradigm: A review of critical information systems research 1991–2001. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 251–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roode, D., Speight, H., Pollock, M., & Webber, R. (2004). It’s not the digital divide-it’s the socio-techno divide! In ECIS 2004 Proceedings (p. 112). Turku, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, D., Osborne-Stafsnes, J., Amy, C. H., Boslaugh, S., & Slate-Miller, K. (2013). Early lessons from four ‘aligning forces for quality’communities bolster the case for patient-centered care. Health Affairs, 32(2), 232–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, F. (2018). Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of IS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3), 380–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultze, U., & Leidner, D. E. (2002). Studying knowledge management in information systems research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 213–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepucha, K. R., Fowler, F., & Mulley, A. (2004). Policy support for patient-centered care: The need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Health Affairs-Millwood Va Then Bethesda Ma-, 23.
   Google Scholar
• Sporton, R. K., & Francis, S.-A. (2001). Choosing not to immunize: Are parents making informed decisions? Family Practice, 18(2), 181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C. (2008). Information systems: Critical perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C., Doherty, N. F., Shaw, M., & Janicke, H. (2014). Critical theory as an approach to the ethics of information security. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(3), 675–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C., Tremblay, M. C., & LeRouge, C. M. (2011). Focus groups and critical social IS research: How the choice of method can promote emancipation of respondents and researchers. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(4), 378–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B.-C. (2004). Whose discourse? A comparison of the Foucauldian and Habermasian concepts of discourse in critical IS research. AMCIS 2004 Proceedings (p. 538). New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, C., Lorenzi, N., Harle, C. A., Zhou, X., & Chen, Y. (2016). Interactive systems for patient-centered care to enhance patient engagement.
   Google Scholar
• Thielst, C. B. (2010). Social media: Ubiquitous community and patient engagement. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 28(2), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2004). ICT, power, and developmental discourse: A critical analysis. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 20(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation1. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Uden-Kraan, C. F., Drossaert, C. H., Taal, E., Seydel, E. R., & van de Laar, M. A. (2009). Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients’ empowerment. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(1), 61–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 122–146.
   Google Scholar
• Walkinshaw, E. (2011). Mandatory vaccinations: The Canadian picture. Ottawa, Canada: Can Med Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, J., Stahl, B. C., & Salam, A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis as a review methodology: An empirical example. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 257–285.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, T. (2004). From critical theory into information systems practice: A case study of a payroll-personnel system. In Information Systems Research (pp. 555–575). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, J., & Gasson, S. (2006). Social engagement in an online community of inquiry. In ICIS 2006 Proceedings (p. 47). Milwaukee, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. F. (1991). Participatory action research.Sage focus editions (Vol. 123). Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., Guo, L., Hu, M., & Liu, W. (2017). Influence of customer engagement with company social networks on stickiness: Mediating effect of customer value creation. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., O’Carroll Bantum, E., Owen, J., Bakken, S., & Elhadad, N. (2017). Online cancer communities as informatics intervention for social support: Conceptualization, characterization, and impact. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(2), 451–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar