Impact of IT offerings strategies and IT integration capability on IT vendor value creation

References

• Baldwin, C. (2008). Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(1), 155–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., & Clark, K. (2000). Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management Studies, 17(1), 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beggs, A., & Klemperer, P. (1992). Multi-period competition with switching costs. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 60(3), 651–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez, J., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). How information technology influences opportunity exploration and exploitation firm’s capabilities. Information & Management, 55(4), 508–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez, J., Ray, G., & Henseler, J. (2018). Impact of information technology infrastructure flexibility on mergers and acquisitions. MIS Quarterly, 42(1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensaou, M., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Configurations of interorganizational relationships: A comparison. Management Science, 41(9), 1471–1492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidan, M., Rowe, F., & Truex, D. (2012). An empirical study of IS architectures in French SMEs: Integration approaches. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(3), 287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, L., Heinzl, A., & Markus, M. L. (2001) Tailoring ERP systems: A spectrum of choices and their implications. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference System Sciences pp 1–9. Maui, Hawaii: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2001). Unpacking the black box of modularity, technologies, products and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 179–205.
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, F., & Masini, A. (2011). Balancing specialized and generic capabilities in the provision of integrated solutions: Empirical evidence from the IT sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(1), 91–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, F., & Prencipe, A. (2008). Configuring capabilities for integrated solutions: Evidence from the IT sector. Industry & Innovation, 15(3), 277–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chari, K., & Seshadri, S. (2004). Demystifying integration. Communications of the ACM, 47(7), 58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatain, O. (2011). Value creation, competition, and performance in buyer-supplier relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 32(1), 76–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatain, O., & Zemsky, P. (2007). The horizontal scope of the firm: Organizational tradeoffs vs. buyer-supplier relationships. Management Science, 53(4), 550–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. D. (1988). Equilibrium state of aggregation in suspensions comprising linear clusters. Journal of Statistical Physics, 51(3–4), 559–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. A., Kahl, S. J., & Suarez, F. F. (2015). Services, industry evolution, and the competitive strategies of product firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 559–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the ERP system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4) (July–August), 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A., Brady, T., & Hobday, M. (2006). Changing a path toward integrated solutions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A., Brady, T., & Hobday, M. (2007). Organizing for solutions: Systems seller vs. systems integrator. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. M., Kettinger, W. J., & Kunev, D. G. (2009). When users are IT experts too: The effects of joint IT competence and partnership on satisfaction with enterprise-level systems implementation. European Journal of Information System, 18(1), 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DE CORBIERE, F., & Rowe, F. (2013). From ideal data synchronization to hybrid forms of interconnections: Architectures, processes, and data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(10), 550–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desyllas, P., & Sako, M. (2013). Profiting from business model innovation: Evidence from pay-as-you-drive auto insurance. Research Policy, 42(1), 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhan, S., Levy, M., & Powell, P. (2001). Information systems strategies in knowledge-based SMEs: The role of core competencies. European Journal of Information Systems, 10(1), 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elamrani, R., Rowe, F., & Geffroy‐Maronnat, B. (2006). The effects of enterprise resource planning implementation strategy on cross‐functionality. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 79–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassott, G., Henseler, J., & Coelho, P. S. (2016). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models with composite variables. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1887–1900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Gosain, S., Malhotra, A., & EL SAWY, O. A. (2004). Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 7–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, V., & Saeed, K. A. (2007). The impact of product, market, and relationship characteristics on interorganizational system integration in manufacturer-supplier dyads. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 185–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S., Kuruzovich, J., & Ravichandran, T. (2013). Service expansion of product firms in the information technology industry: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 127–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, M., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. (1994). Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Science, 40, 1720–1747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., & Chin, W. W. (2010). A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(1), 82–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., … Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobday, M., Davies, A., & Prencipe, A. (2005). Systems integration: A core competence of the modern corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 1109–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1997). The effects of human resource practices on manufacturing performance: A study of steel finishing lines. American Economic Review, 87(3), 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (2008). Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19(5), 729–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm. Combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. L. (2004). A framework for assessing the business value of information technology infrastructures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(2), 11–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W. (2005). Investigating success factors in enterprise application integration: A case-driven analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampel, J., & Mintzberg, H. (1996). Customizing customization. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, M. (2005). Two types of organizational modularity: SAP, ERP product architecture and the German tipping point in the make/buy decision for IT services, in Miozzo, M. and Gimshaw, D. (eds.). Institutions of the New Economy: Knowledge Intensive Business Services and Changing Organizational Forms. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010). Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 224–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina, N., & Ross, J. W. (2003). From the vendor’s perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 331–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43(7), 934–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, D., & Seidmann, A. (2015). Analyzing software as a service with per-transaction charges. Information Systems Research, 26(2), 360–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marciniak, R., Elamrani, R., Rowe, F., & Adam, F. (2014). Does ERP integration foster cross-functional awareness? Challenging conventional wisdom for SMEs and large French firms. Business Process Management Journal, 20(6), 865–886.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review, 80, 511–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2–3), 179–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1981). Toward a new contingency perspective: The search for organizational gestalts. Journal of Management Studies, 18, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Roth, A. (1994). A Taxonomy of Manufacturing Strategies. Management Science, 40(3), 285–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V. L. (2006). Knowledge integration and information technology project performance. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 919–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, N. P., Mathiassen, L., & Robey, D. (2011). Building contextual ambidexterity in a software company to improve firm-level coordination. European Journal of Information System, 20(6), 674–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, J. A., & Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm: The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, S., & Sharma, S. (2017). Impact of customization over software quality in ERP projects: An empirical study. Software Quality Journal, 25(2), 581–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433–452.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Petter, S., Straub, D. W., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research, MIS Quarterly, 31(4), December 2007, 657–679.
   Google Scholar
• Pine, B. J. (1993). Mass customization-the new frontier in business competition. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, A., & Tang, X. (2010). Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 516–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivkin, J. W. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science, 46(6), 824–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samara, T. (2015). ERP and information systems: Integration or disintegration. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in Product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17(winter), 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A. (2000). Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 312–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A., & Steensma, H. K. (2001). The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1149–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, P. B. (2014). Implications for strategic IS research of the resource-based theory of the firm: A reflection. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(4), 257–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2002). Evolution toward Fit. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 125–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2003). Why focus? A study of intra-industry focus effects. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 51(2), 121–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sila, I. (2010). Do organisational and environmental factors moderate the effects of internet-based interorganisational systems on firm performance?European Journal of Information Systems, 19(5), 581–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonson, I. (2005). Determinants of customers responses to customized offers: Conceptual framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 32–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, O., Mcevily, S., Ren, C. R., & Roy, R. (2006). Niche width revisited: Organizational scope, behavior and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 915–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiller, T., & Zelner, B. (1997). Product complementarities, capabilities and governance: A dynamic transaction cost perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(3), 561–594.
   Google Scholar
• Stump, R., Athaide, G., & Joshi, A. (2002). Managing seller-buyer new product development relationships for customized products: A contingency model based on transaction cost analysis and empirical test. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(6), 439–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., & Venkatraman, N. (2001). Determinants of transnational new product development capability: Testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeishi, A. (2001). Bridging inter and intra firm boundaries: Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 403–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi, H., Rai, A., & Venkatraman, N. (2010). Reframing the dominant quests of informati systems strategy research for complex adapt business systems. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 822–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations In Action. New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2008). Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 769–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. (2004). Measuring modularity-based manufacturing practices and their impact on mass customization capability: A customer-driven perspective. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umapathy, K., Purao, S., & Barton, R. R. (2008). Designing enterprise integration solutions: Effectively. European Journal of Information System, 17(5), 518–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppström, E., Lönn, C., Hoffsten, M., & Thorström, J. (2015) New implications for customization of ERP systems. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii (pp 4220–4229).
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 432–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, S., Droge, C., & Germain, R. (1999). The relationship between product customization and organizational structure. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 377–391.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, C. A., & Hsuan, J. (2009). Service architecture and modularity. Decision Sciences, 40(3), 541–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A., Peck, S., Fenton, E., & Conyon, M. (1999). Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992-1996. Organization Science, 10(5), 583–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, H. (1985). Partial least squares. In Kotz & N. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 6), 581–591. Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, N., & Rajagopalan, S. (2009). Standard vs. custom products: Variety, lead time, and price competition. Marketing Science, 28(5), 887–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, K., Cadeaux, J., & Song, H. (2013). Distribution channel network and relational performance: The intervening mechanism of adaptive distribution flexibility. Decision Sciences, 44(5), 915–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar