Feedback at scale: designing for accurate and timely practical digital skills evaluation

References

• Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011). The power of small wins. Harvard Business Review, 89(5), 70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1970). Intervention theory and method: A behavioral science view. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandiera, O., Larcinese, V., & Rasul, I. (2010). Heterogeneous class size effects: New evidence from a panel of university students*. The Economic Journal, 120(549), 1365–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., Kaul, M., & Storey, V. (2017). Establishing reliability in design science research. ICIS 2017 Proceedings, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, S. L., & Pallet, W. H. (2013). Essay on importance of class size in higher education | inside higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/01/29/essay-importance-class-size-higher-education
   Google Scholar
• Burning Glass Technologies. (2017). The digital edge: Middle-skill workers and careers. Boston, MA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chambliss, D. F., & Takacs, C. G. (2014). How college works (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuseo, J. (2007). The empirical case against large class size: Adverse effects on the teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students. Journal of Faculty Development, 21(1), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, T., Lee-Post, A., & Hapke, H. (2017). Universal design for learning in teaching large lecture classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 39(1), 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. (2001, November 1). The next society. The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/node/770819
   Google Scholar
• Gershkoff, A. (2015, December 31). How to stem the global shortage of data scientists. Retrieved, from TechCrunch website: http://social.techcrunch.com/2015/12/31/how-to-stem-the-global-shortage-of-data-scientists/
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iivari, J. (2015). Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkelenberg, E. C., Dillon, M., & Christy, S. M. (2008). The effects of class size on student grades at a public university. Economics of Education Review, 27(2), 221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2016). Human work in the robotic future: Policy for the age of automation. Foreign Affairs, 95(4), 139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meth, H., Mueller, B., & Maedche, A. (2015). Designing a requirement mining system. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(9), 799–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Chen, M., & Purdin, T. D. M. (1990). Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 89–106.
   Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic it skills training. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., Rodriguez, J., Palese, B., & Bartosiak, M. (2017). The dark side of digital transformation: The case of information systems education. ICIS 2017 Proceedings, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Pigni, F., Piccoli, G., & Watson, R. (2016). Digital data streams. California Management Review, 58(3), 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K., & Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J., Piccoli, G., & Bartosiak, M. (2019). Nudging the classroom: Designing a socio-technical artifact to reduce academic procrastination. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sapelli, C., & Illanes, G. (2016). Class size and teacher effects in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 52(C), 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sein, M., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, M., & Markus, M. L. (2013). Conceptualizing the socioTechnical (ST) artifact. Systems, Signs & Actions, 7(1), 82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. The University of Chicago Law Review, 70(4), 1159–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J., & van Deursen, A. (2009). inequalities of digital skills and how to overcome them. In E. Ferro, Y. K. Dwivedi, J. R. Gil–Gracia, & M. D. Williams (Eds.), Handbook of research on overcoming digital divides: Constructing an equitable and competitive information society (pp. 278–291). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39(1), 40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinmann, M., Schneider, C., & Vom Brocke, J. (2016). Digital nudging. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(6), 433–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 34(2), 213–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar