Efficiency creep and shadow innovation: enacting ambidextrous IT Governance in the public sector

References

• Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D. (2017). Blade Runner economics: Will innovation lead the economic recovery? Research Policy, 46(3), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askarany, D., & Yazdifar, H. (2007). Why ABC is not widely implemented? International Journal of Business, 7(1), 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Luftman, J. (2011). CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannister, F. (2007). The curse of the benchmark: An assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307077959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45, 47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., Zimmermann, A., & Raisch, S. (2016). How do firms adapt to discontinuous change? Bridging the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives. California Management Review, 58(4), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra, A., Yeliz Eseryel, U., & van Offenbeek, M. A. (2017). Stakeholders’ enactment of competing logics in IT governance: Polarization, compromise or synthesis? European Journal of Information Systems, 27(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0055-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D. Q., Preston, D. S., & Xia, W. (2010). Antecedents and effects of CIO supply-side and demand-side leadership: A staged maturity model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 231–272. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Zhao, J., George, J. F., Li, Y., & Zhai, S. (2017). The influence of inter-firm IT governance strategies on relational performance: The moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, T., & Chandler, S. M. (2015). Exploration, exploitation, and public sector innovation: An organizational learning perspective for the public sector. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership and Governance, 39(2), 139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram, W. A., Broham, K., & Gallupe, R. B. (2016). Information systems control: A review and framework for emerging information systems processes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(4), 216–266. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, G. S., Denford, J. S., Williams, C. K., Preston, D., & Desouza, K. C. (2016). An examination of effective IT governance in the public sector using the legal view of agency theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(4), 1180–1208. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1267533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization, designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization, (1), 167–188.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossestøl, K., Breit, E., Andreassen, T. A., & Klemsdal, L. (2015). Managing institutional complexity in public sector reform: Hybridization in front-line service organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabski, S. V., Leech, S. A., & Schmidt, P. J. (2011). A review of ERP research: A future agenda for accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 37–78. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2011.25.1.37
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. W., Kagener, E., Henfridsson, O., & Ruch, T. J. (2018). IT consumerization and the transformation of IT Governance. MIS Quarterly, 42(2), 1225–1253.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. W., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., & Mähring, M. (2015). Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemette, M. G., & Paré, G. (2012). Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwynne, P. (1997). Skunk works, 1990s-style. Research-Technology Management, 40(4), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1997.11671138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haffke, I., Kalgovas, B., & Benlian, A. (2017). Options for transforming the IT function using bimodal IT. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(2), 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansén, S. O., & Wakonen, J. (1997). Innovation, a winning solution? International Journal of Technology Management, 13(4), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1997.001668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. Mis quarterly, 907–931.
   Google Scholar
• Heracleous, L., Yniguez, C., & Gonzalez, S. A. (2019). Ambidexterity as historically embedded process: Evidence from NASA, 1958 to 2016. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 55(2), 161–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Henfridsson, O., Liu, M. J., & Newell, S. (2017). Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., & Van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Editorial. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J. (2010). Governing through technology: Information artefacts and social practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Tayi, G. K. (2017). Open innovation in the public sector: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. R., & Teo, T. S. (2000). Assessing the impact of proactive versus reactive modes of strategic information systems planning. Omega, 28(6), 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00079-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger, J., Raisch, S., & Schimmer, M. (2018). Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: The contingent benefits of ambidexterity. Organization Science, 29(3), 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutchen, M. D. (2011). Managing IT as a business: A survival guide for CEOs. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland, R. J., Jr (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDuffie, J. P. (1997). The road to root cause: Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants. Management Science, 43(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, J. (2010). Unpackaging IT Governance. BAS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, J., & Bygstad, B. (2013). Why I act differently: Studying patterns of legitimation among CIOs through motive talk. Information Technology and People, 26(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2012-0117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, J., & Nilsson, A. (2015). Enterprise system platforms: Transforming the Agenda. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, J., Torell, J., Polutnik, L., & Ask, U. (2017). Ambidextrous IT governance in the public sector: A revelatory case study of the swedish tax authorities. In Lazar Rusu and Gianluigi Viscusi (eds.), Information technology governance in public organizations (pp. 253–267). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNair, C. J., Polutnik, L., & Silvi, R. (2001). Cost management and value creation: The missing link. European Accounting Review, 10(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180122848
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I., Gong, Y., & Bertot, J. (2018). Agile government: Systematic literature review and future research. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1958). The functions of the professional association. The American Journal of Nursing, 58(1), 50–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (1995). Lockheed’s skunk works: The first fifty years. Air Power History, 42(1), 52–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(2), 160–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithas, S., & Rust, R. T. (2016). How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2009). In defense of triangulation: A critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 20(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office, 1(1), 40.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N., Starliper, M. W., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2017). The impact of shadow IT systems on perceived information credibility and managerial decision making. Accounting Horizons, 31(3), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84183.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahrovani, Y., Pinsonneault, A., & Austin, R. D. (2018). If you cut employees some slack, will they innovate? MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(4), 47–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Tushman, M. L. (2016). Growing new corporate businesses: From initiation to graduation. Organization Science, 27(5), 1237–1257. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, B. R., & Janos, L. (2013). Skunk works: A personal memoir of my years of Lockheed. Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N., Campbell, D. E., & Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2016). Using information systems to sense opportunities for innovation: integrating postadoptive use behaviors with the dynamic managerial capability perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(1), 45–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanelli, E., & Tushman, M. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1141–1666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salge, T. O., Kohli, R., & Barrett, M. (2015). Investing in information systems: On the behavioral and institutional search mechanisms underpinning hospitals’ IS investment decisions. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1927). The explanation of the business cycle. Economica, 21(21), 286–311. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548401
   Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003). Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14(6), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.650.24840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., & Hess, T. (2017). How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., & Umans, T. (2015). Organizational ambidexterity at the local government level: The effects of managerial focus. Public Management Review, 17(6), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.849292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soe, R. M., & Drechsler, W. (2017). Agile local governments: Experimentation before implementation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stettner, U., & Lavie, D. (2014). Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 1903–1929. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. (1939). Production and distribution in the short run. Journal of Political Economy, 47(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1086/255387
   Google Scholar
• Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., & Lindgren, R. (2017). Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassabehji, R., Hackne, R., & Popovič, A. (2016). Emergent digital era governance: Enacting the role of the ‘institutional entrepreneur’ in transformational change. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TBMV (2016) Accelerating the mission: Recommendations for optimizing federal technology cost and value in the age of FITARA. https://www.actiac.org/accelerating-mission-recommendations-optimizing-federal-technology-cost-and-value-age-fitara
   Google Scholar
• Thierer, A. D. (2016). Permissionless innovation and public policy: A 10-point blueprint. SSRN Papers. George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• Trong Tuan, L. (2017). Reform in public organizations: The roles of ambidextrous leadership and moderating mechanisms. Public Management Review, 19(4), 518–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1195438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubaldi, B., Van Ooijen, C., & Welby, B. (2019). A data-driven public sector: Enabling the strategic use of data for productive, inclusive and trustworthy governance. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, (33), 0_1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 33(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.v30:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Grembergen, W., & De Haes, S. (2009). Enterprise governance of information technology: achieving strategic alignment and value. Springer Science and Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organization ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., El-Haddadeh, R., & Al-Busaidy, M. (2016). Digitally-enabled service transformation in the public sector: The lure of institutional pressure and strategic response towards change. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 658–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT Governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., Mähring, M., Remus, U., & Saunders, C. (2016). Control configurations and control enactment in information systems projects: Review and expanded theoretical framework. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 741–774.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2016). Digital transformation initiative: Unlocking $100 trillion for business and society from digital transformation.
   Google Scholar
• World Government Summit & OECD (2017) Embracing Innovation in Government. www.försäkringskassan.se, Retrieved April 1, 2019, from. www.skatteverket.se
   Google Scholar
• Xue, L., Ray, G., & Sambamurthy, V. (2012). Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 509–528. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, L., Ray, G., & Zhao, X. (2017). Managerial incentives and IT strategic posture. Information Systems Research, 28(1), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yli-Huumo, J., Päivärinta, T., Rinne, J., & Smolander, K. (2018). Suomi.fi – Towards government 3.0 with a national service platform. In P. Parycek, O. Glassey, M. Janssen, H. J. Scholl, E. Tambouris, E. Kalampokis, & S. Virkar (Eds.), Electronic government. EGOV 2018. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 11020, pp. 3–14). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37(8), 1188–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, A., Raisch, S., & Cardinal, L. B. (2018). Managing persistent tensions on the frontline: A configurational perspective on ambidexterity. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5), 739–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.2018.55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar