The maturation of digital objects in innovation projects: the role of interpersonal networks and team sharing atmosphere

References

• Allen, J., James, A., & Gamlen, P. (2007). Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: A case study using social network analysis. R&D Management, 37(3), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R., Bardhan, I., & Asdemir, O. (2006). Understanding the impact of collaboration software on product design and development. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 352–373. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baralou, E., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). How is new organizational knowledge created in a virtual context? An ethnographic study. Organization Studies, 3(5), 593–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614556918
   Google Scholar
• Barley, W. C. (2015). Anticipatory work: How the need to represent knowledge across boundaries shapes work practices within them. Organization Science, 26(6), 1612–1628. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, M., & Oborn, E. (2010). Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams. Human Relations, 63(8), 1199–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709355657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., Myers, M., & Yoo, Y. J. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for IS research. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach D. & Pedersen R.B. (2016). Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Menahem, S. M., Von Krogh, G., Erden, Z., & Schneider, A. (2016). Coordinating knowledge creation in multidisciplinary teams: Evidence from early-stage drug discovery. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørn P. & Ngwenyama O. (2009). Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence, Information Systems Journal, 19, 227–253, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00281.x
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, E., Grebeci, K., & Rieu, D. (2007). A unified framework to manage information maturity in design process. International Journal of Product Development, 4(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2007.012495
   Google Scholar
• Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, R. J., Tenkasi, R. V., & Te’eni, D. (1994). Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organization Science, 5(3), 456–475. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.3.456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouty, I. (2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, H. C. (2013). Working alone together: Coordination in collaboration across domains of expertise. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2001). Managing knowledge in loosely coupled networks: Exploring the links between product and knowledge dynamics. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 1019–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(4), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602235001
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, translating and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 1(5), 558–568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. J. (2007). Information technology, organizational structure, and new product development—The mediating effect of cross-functional team interaction. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(4), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.906831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(1), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.4.381
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, G. (2008). Perspective: The stage gate idea-to-launch process update, what’s new, and nexgen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, M., & Rowe, F. (2016). What does PLMS (Product Lifecycle Management Systems) manage: Data or documents? Complementarity or contingency for SMEs. Computers in Industry, 75(1), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einsenhardt, K., & Ott, T. (2017). Rigor in theory building from multiple cases. In R. Mir & S. Jain (Eds.), The Routledge companion to qualitative research in organization studies (pp. 79–91). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Eversheim, W., Roggatz, A., Zimmermann, H.-J., & Derichs, T. (1997). Information management for concurrent engineering. European Journal of Operational Research, 100(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00288-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, B., & Whyte, J. (2009). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as ‘epistemic objects. Organization Studies, 30(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608083014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00870.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2005). Vicious and virtuous circles in the management of knowledge: The case of Infosys technologies. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, T., & Saywer, J. (2010). Research team design and management for centralized R&D. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2023132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hislop, D. (2002). Mission impossible? Communicating and sharing knowledge via information technology. Journal of Information Technology, 17, 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02683960210161230
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagment and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations (pp. 216–239). HBS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leenders, R., Engelen, J., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(03)00005-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1(3), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W. D., & Qiu, Z. M. (2006). State-of-the-art technologies and methodologies for collaborative product development systems. International Journal of Production Research, 44(3), 2525–2540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500422080
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., & John, R. (2005). Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., More, P. H., & Faraj, S. (2012). Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organization Science, 23(4), 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., & Gasser, L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merminod, V., Mothe, C., & Rowe, F. (2014). Effects of product lifecycle management on the reliability an productivity of new product development: The case of co-development with China. In F. Rowe & D. Te’eni (Eds.), Innovation and IT in an international context: R&D strategy and operations (pp. 155–186). Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Merminod, V., & Rowe, F. (2012). How does PLM technology support knowledge transfer and translation in new product development? Transparency and boundary spanners in an international context. Information & Organization, 22(4), 295–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merminod, V., Rowe, F., & Te’eni, D. (2012). Knowledge sharing and knowledge maturation in circles of trust: The case of new product development. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando: Association for Information Systems eLibrary.
   Google Scholar
• Merminod, V., Rowe, F., & Watts, S. (2008). Product lifecycle management, knowledge integration and reliability in new product co-development: A case study between europe and China. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Paris: Association for Information Systems eLibrary.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S. (2003). Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Nagata, A. (2000). A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: A new perspective on the theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Okhuysen, G. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, 13(4), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.370.2947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P., & El Sawy, O. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198–230. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarbrough, H., Panourgias, N., & Nandhakumar, J. (2015). Developing a relational view of the organizing role of objects: A study of the innovation process in computer games. Organization Studies, 36(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614557213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder, H., Driver, M., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Shaikh, M., & Vaast, E. (2016). Folding and unfolding: Balancing openness and transparency in open source communities. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrowe, R., Liden, R., Wayne, S., & Kraimer, M. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Newell, S., & Robertson, M. (2007). The role of objects in biomedical innovation. Human Relations, 60(12), 1809–1837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707084915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, Y.-M. (2017). Effects of product lifecycle management systems on new product development performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 46(C), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te’eni, D. (2001). Review: A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 251–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., & Loch, C. H. (2002). Exchange of preliminary information in concurrent engineering: Alternative coordination strategies. Organization Science, 13(4), 402–419. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.402.2948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. A. (2018). Imagination and creativity in organizations. Organization Studies, 39(2–3), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617736939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Un, C. A., Cuervo Cazurra, A., & Asakawa, K. (2010). R&D collaborations and product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00744.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinck, D. (2003). Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakura, E. K. (2002). Charting time: Timelines as temporal boundary objects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 956–970. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, A., Osei-Bryson, K., & Ngwenyama, O. (2003). Leveraging knowledge representation, usage, and interpretation to help reengineer the product development life cycle: Visual computing and the tacit dimensions of product development. Computers in Industry, 51(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar