2,053
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

How synchronous participation affects the willingness to subscribe to social live streaming services: the role of co-Interactive behavior on Twitch

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 800-817 | Received 19 Nov 2019, Accepted 21 Mar 2022, Published online: 22 Apr 2022

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of systems concepts. Management Science, 17(11), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.11.661
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Anderson, C. (2009). Free: the future of a radical price. New York: Hyperion.
  • Anderson, S. (2017). Watching people is not a game: interactive online corporeality, Twitch. tv and videogame streams. Game Studies, 17(1), 1–16.
  • Ariely, D., Gneezy, U., Haruvy, E., Campbell, M. C., Winterich, K. P., & Huber, J. (2018). Social norms and the price of zero. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1018
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(2), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10006
  • Bapna, R., Ramaprasad, J., & Umyarov, A. (2018). Monetizing freemium communities: does paying for premium increase Social Engagement? MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 719–735. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13592
  • Bapna, R., & Umyarov, A. (2015). Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Science, 61(8), 1902–1920. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2081
  • Bateman, P. J., Gray, P. H., & Butler, B. S. (2011). Research note —the impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0265
  • Battarbee, K. (2003). Co-experience: The social user experience. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Ft Lauderdale, USA.
  • Battarbee, K., & Koskinen, I. (2005). Co-experience: User experience as interaction. CoDesign, 1(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880412331289917
  • Battarbee, K., & Koskinen, I. (2008). Co-experience: Product experience as social interaction. In H. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product Experience (pp. 461–476). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  • Brandall, B. (2017). Freemium Conversion Rate: Why Spotify Destroys Dropbox by 667% Retrieved May 05, 2021, from https://www.process.st/freemium-conversion-rate/
  • Bründl, S., & Hess, T. (2018). Passive, Active, or Co-Active? The Link Between Synchronous User Participation and Willingness to Pay for Premium Options. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, USA.
  • Bründl, S., Matt, C., & Hess, T. (2017). Consumer use of social live streaming services: the influence of co-experience and effectance on enjoyment. Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2017), Guimarães, Portugal.
  • Cheikh-Ammar, M., & Barki, H. (2016). The influence of social presence, social exchange and feedback features on sns continuous use: The Facebook context. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 28(2), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2016040103
  • Chen, Y., Harper, F. M., Konstan, J., & Li, S. X. (2010). Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: a field experiment on movieLens. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1358–1398. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.4.1358
  • Chen, A., Lu, Y., Chau, P. Y. K., & Gupta, S. (2014). Classifying, measuring, and predicting users’ overall active behavior on social networking sites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(3), 213–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.995557
  • Cheng, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Leskovec, J. (2014). How community feedback shapes user behavior. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2014), Ann Arbour, USA.
  • Chiu, C.-M., & Huang, H.-Y. (2015). Examining the antecedents of user gratification and its effects on individuals’ social network services usage: The moderating role of habit. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(4), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.9
  • Choi, J., Lee, S. M., & Soriano, D. R. (2009). An empirical study of user acceptance of fee-based online content. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(3), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2009.11645325
  • Corning, P. A. (1998). The synergism hypothesis: On the concept of synergy and its role in the evolution of complex systems. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 21(2), 133–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1061-7361(00)80003-X
  • Daugherty, T., Eastin, M. S., & Bright, L. (2008). Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2008.10722139
  • Ferguson, J. E., & Soekijad, M. (2016). Multiple interests or unified voice? Online communities as intermediary spaces for development. Journal of Information Technology, 31(4), 358–381. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.25
  • Forlizzi, J., & Battarbee, K. (2004). Understanding experience in interactive systems. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS 2004), Cambridge, USA.
  • Fullerton, G. (2003). When Does Commitment Lead to Loyalty? Journal of Service Research, 5(4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670503005004005
  • Fullerton, G. (2005). The service quality–loyalty relationship in retail services: Does commitment matter? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.04.001
  • Gefen, D., & Ridings, C. M. (2002). Implementation team responsiveness and user evaluation of customer relationship management: a quasi-experimental design study of social exchange theory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045717
  • Graf-Vlachy, L., & Buhtz, K. (2017). Social influence in technology adoption research: a literature review and research Agenda. Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2017), Guimarães, Portugal.
  • Gros, D., Hackenholt, A., Zawadzki, P., & Wanner, B. (2018). Interactions of Twitch users and their usage behavior. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social Computing and Social Media. Technologies and Analytics. SCSM 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10914, pp. 201–213). New York, USA: Springer.
  • Gros, D., Wanner, B., Hackenholt, A., Zawadzki, P., & Knautz, K. (2017). World of streaming. Motivation and gratification on Twitch. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social Computing and Social Media. Human Behavior. SCSM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10282, pp. 44–57). New York, USA: Springer.
  • Hamari, J., Hanner, N., & Koivisto, J. (2017). Service quality explains why people use freemium services but not if they go premium: An empirical study in free-to-play games. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1449–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.09.004
  • Hamilton, W. A., Garretson, O., & Kerne, A. (2014). Streaming on twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada.
  • Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with youtube: blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(2), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908270
  • Hess, T., & Matt, C. (2013). The Internet and the Value Chains of the Media Industry. In S. Diehl, & M. Karmasin(Eds.), Media and Convergence Managementnternet and the alue hains of the edia ndustry. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36163-0_4
  • Hilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J. T., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.013
  • Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl013
  • Hong, K., Gu, B., Burtch, G., Huang, N., Liang, C., Wang, K., & Fu, D. (2016). Effectiveness of performance feedback in stimulating user-generated content. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016), Dublin, Ireland.
  • Horng, S.-M. (2012). A study of the factors influencing users’ decisions to pay for Web 2.0 subscription services. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(7), 891–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.677305
  • Hosmer, D. W., Jr, Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (Vol. 398). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.006
  • Huang, N., Burtch, G., Gu, B., Hong, Y., Liang, C., Wang, K., Fu, D., & Yang, B. (2019). Motivating user-generated content with performance feedback: Evidence from randomized field experiments. Management Science, 65(1), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2944
  • Investopedia. (2019). How Amazon’s Twitch Platform Makes Money Retrieved May 05, 2021, from https://www.investopedia.com/investing/how-does-twitch-amazons-video-game-streaming-platform-make-money/
  • Jodén, H., & Strandell, J. (2021). Building viewer engagement through interaction rituals on Twitch.tv. Information, Communication & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1913211
  • Joyce, E., & Kraut, R. E. (2006). Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(3), 723–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00033.x
  • Junglas, I., Goel, L., Abraham, C., & Ives, B. (2013). The social component of information systems—how sociability contributes to technology acceptance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(10), 585–616. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00344
  • Kalman, Y. M., & Rafaeli, S. (2011). Online pauses and silence: Chronemic expectancy violations in written computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 38(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210378229
  • Kalman, Y. M., Scissors, L. E., Gill, A. J., & Gergle, D. (2013). Online chronemics convey social information. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.036
  • Khan, M. L. (2013). Understanding motives for user consumption and participation on youtube: a uses and gratifications Perspective. Proceedings of the 12th Annual IADIS International Conference on the WWW/Internet (ICWI 2013), Fort Worth, USA.
  • Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the web: secret strategies for successful online communities. Berkely, CA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing.
  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
  • Koch, O. F., & Benlian, A. (2017). The effect of free sampling strategies on freemium conversion rates. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-016-0236-z
  • Kumar, V. (2014). Making “Freemium” Work. Harvard Business Review, 92(5), 27–29 Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/05/making-freemium-work
  • Lampe, C., & Johnston, E. (2005). Follow the (slash) dot: Effects of feedback on new members in an online community. Proceedings of the 2005 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, USA.
  • Lesma, V. R. B., & Okada, H. (2012). Influence of feedback from SNS members on consumer behavior in electronic commerce. Proceedings of the 2012 International conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Li, C., & Bernoff, J. (2011). Groundswell: Winning in a world transformed by social technologies. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Li, Z., & Cheng, Y. (2014). From free to fee: Exploring the antecedents of consumer intention to switch to paid online content. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 281–299.
  • Lim, S., Cha, S. Y., Park, C., Lee, I., & Kim, J. (2012). Getting closer and experiencing together: Antecedents and consequences of psychological distance in social media-enhanced real-time streaming video. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1365–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.022
  • Liu, C. Z., Au, Y. A., & Choi, H. S. (2014). Effects of freemium strategy in the mobile app market: an empirical study of google play. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(3), 326–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.995564
  • Ma, X., Qin, Y., Chen, Z., & Cho, H. (2021). Perceived ephemerality, privacy calculus, and the privacy settings of an ephemeral social media site. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106928
  • Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491
  • Mäntymäki, M., Islam, A. K. M. N., & Benbasat, I. (2020). What drives subscribing to premium in freemium services? A consumer value-based view of differences between upgrading to and staying with premium. Information Systems Journal, 30(2), 295–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12262
  • Mason, W. A., Conrey, F. R., & Smith, E. R. (2007). Situating social influence processes: dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301032
  • Matt, C., & Hess, T. (2016). Product fit uncertainty and its effects on vendor choice: An experimental study. Electronic Markets, 26(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0199-5
  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-F
  • Mithas, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2009). From association to causation via a potential outcomes approach. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0184
  • Moon, J. Y., & Sproull, L. S. (2008). The role of feedback in managing the internet-Based Volunteer Work Force. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 494–515. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0208
  • Nagelkerke, N. J. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
  • Nematzadeh, A., Ciampaglia, G. L., Ahn, Y. Y., & Flammini, A. (2019) Information overload in group communication: From conversation to cacophony in the twitch chat). Royal Society Open Science 6(10), 19412. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191412
  • Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the Internet: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01458.x
  • Niemand, T., Mai, R., & Kraus, S. (2019). The zero-price effect in freemium business models: The moderating effects of free mentality and price–quality inference. Psychology & Marketing, 36(8), 773–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21211
  • Niemand, T., Tischer, S., Fritzsche, T., & Kraus, S. (2015). The freemium effect: why consumers perceive more value with free than with premium offers. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2015), Fort Worth, USA.
  • Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Zalmanson, L. (2013). Content or community? a digital business strategy for content providers in the social age. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 591–616. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.12
  • Parameswaran, M., & Whinston, A. B. (2007). Research issues in social computing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(6), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00132
  • Pavlik, J. V. (1996). New media technology: Cultural and commercial perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Pires, K., & Simon, G. (2015). YouTube live and Twitch: A tour of user-generated live streaming systems. Proceedings of the 6th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference, Portland, USA.
  • Piwek, L., & Joinson, A. (2016). ‘What do they snapchat about?’ Patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.026
  • Preece, J., & Shneiderman, B. (2009). The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00005
  • Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 2(4), JCMC243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x
  • Ren, Y., Harper, F. M., Drenner, S., Terveen, L., Kiesler, S., Riedl, J., & Kraut, R. E. (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 841–864. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703483
  • Rivero, N. (2021). Amazon has built an unbreakable monopoly in video game streaming. Quartz. Retrieved June 05, 2021, from https://qz.com/1989190/amazons-twitch-is-an-unbreakable-monopoly-in-video-game-streaming/
  • Roßnagel, H., Zibuschka, J., Hinz, O., & Muntermann, J. (2014). Users’ willingness to pay for web identity management systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.33
  • Rubin, D. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the Tobacco Litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020363010465
  • Schreiner, M., Hess, T., & Fathianpour, F. (2013). On the willingness to pay for privacy as a freemium model: first empirical evidence. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2013), Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Shampanier, K., Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2007). Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing Science, 26(6), 742–757. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1060.0254
  • Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2017). Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.019
  • Spagnoletti, P., Resca, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: A multiple case study. Journal of Information Technology, 30(4), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.37
  • Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313
  • Stuart, E. A., King, G., Imai, K., & Ho, D. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i08
  • Subramaniam, N., Nandhakumar, J., & Baptista, J. (2013). Exploring social network interactions in enterprise systems: The role of virtual co‐presence. Information Systems Journal, 23(6), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12019
  • Tang, J. C., Venolia, G., & Inkpen, K. M. (2016). Meerkat and Periscope: I stream, you stream, apps stream for live streams. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, USA.
  • Tanriverdi, H., & Venkatraman, N. (2005). Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.435
  • Time (2014). Amazon to Buy Video Game Live-Streaming Site Twitch for $970 Million. Retrieved 05 May, 2021, from http://time.com/3176912/amazon-twitch-970-million/
  • Twitch (2018). The Year 2017 in Review Retrieved June 26, 2018, from https://www.twitch.tv/year/2017/factsheet.jpg
  • Twitchtracker (2020). Twitch Statistics & Charts. Retrieved 02 July 2020 from https://twitchtracker.com/statistics
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Vock, M., Dolen, W. V., & Ruyter, K. D. (2013). Understanding willingness to pay for social network sites. Journal of Service Research, 16(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670512472729
  • Voigt, S., & Hinz, O. (2016). Making Digital Freemium Business Models a Success: Predicting Customers’ Lifetime Value via Initial Purchase Information. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0395-z
  • Wagner, T. M., Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2014). Converting freemium customers from free to premium—The role of the perceived premium fit in the case of music as a service. Electronic Markets, 24(4), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-014-0168-4
  • Wakefield, R. L., Wakefield, K. L., Baker, J., & Wang, L. C. (2011). How website socialness leads to website use. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.47
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (Vol. 15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, F. (2006). The Freemium Business Model. Retrieved May 05, 2021, from http://avc.com/2006/03/the_freemium_bu/
  • Wohn, D. Y., & Freeman, G. (2020). Live Streaming, Playing, and Money Spending Behaviors in eSports. Games and Culture, 15(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019859184
  • Wohn, D. Y., Jough, P., Eskander, P., Siri, J. S., Shimobayashi, M., & Desai, P. (2019). Understanding Digital Patronage: Why Do People Subscribe to Streamers on Twitch? Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, Barcelona, Spain.
  • WSJ. (2014). Apple Quietly Builds New Networks. Retrieved May 05 2014. https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304851104579361201655365302
  • Wulf, T., Schneider, F. M., & Beckert, S. (2020). Watching players: An exploration of media enjoyment on Twitch. Games and Culture, 15(3), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018788161
  • Ye, L. R., Zhang, Y., Nguyen, -D.-D., & Chiu, J. (2004). Fee-Based Online Services: Exploring Consumers’ Willingness to Pay. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 13(1), 133–141.
  • Yu, E., Jung, C., Kim, H., & Jung, J. (2018). Impact of viewer engagement on gift-giving in live video streaming. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.014
  • Zalmanson, L., & Oestreicher-Singer, G. (2014). Increasing Willingness to Pay Through Encouraging Social Participation: A Web Experiment. Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2014), Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Zalmanson, L., & Oestreicher-Singer, G. (2015). ‘Your Action is Needed’: The Effect of Website-Initiated Participation on User Contributions to Content Websites. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2015), Fort Worth, USA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.