The impact of enterprise architecture management on information systems architecture complexity

References

• Aier, S., Gleichauf, B., & Winter, R. 2011. “Understanding enterprise architecture management design – An empirical analysis,” The 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2011), Zurich, Switzerland. Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2009). Virtual decoupling for It/Business alignment – conceptual foundations, architecture design and implementation example. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-008-0010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aleatrati Khosroshahi, P., Beese, J., & Aier, S. 2016. “What drives application portfolio complexity? An empirical analysis of application portfolio cost drivers at a global automotive company,” 18th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2016), Paris, France. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, S. (2002). The work system method for understanding information systems and information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00906
   Google Scholar
• Amarilli, F., van Vliet, M., & van den Hooff, B. 2016. “Business it alignment through the lens of complexity science,” Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016), Dublin, Ireland. Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Arteta, B. M., & Giachetti, R. E. (2004). A measure of agility as the complexity of the enterprise system. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 20(6), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2004.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity—a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
   Google Scholar
• Barki, H., Rivard, S., & Talbot, J. (2001). An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beese, J., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2015). On the role of complexity for guiding enterprise transformations. In D. Aveiro, R. Pergl, & M. Valenta (Eds.), Advances in Enterprise Engineering Ix. EEWC 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 211, pp. 113–127). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Beetz, R., & Kolbe, L. 2011. “Towards managing it complexity: An it governance framework to measure business-it responsibility sharing and structural it organization,” 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Detroit, USA. Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Benbya, H., & McKelvey, B. (2006). Toward a complexity theory of information systems development. Information Technology & People, 19(1), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840610649952
   Google Scholar
• Bernus, P., & Schmidt, G. (2006). Architectures of information systems. In P. Bernus, K. Mertins, & G. Schmidt (Eds.), Handbook on architectures of information systems (pp. 1–9). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Boh, W. F., & Yellin, D. (2006). “Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 163–207. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The toe (technical, organizational and environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosius, M., Aier, S., Haki, K., & Winter, R. 2018. The Institutional Logic of Harmonization: Local Versus Global Perspectives. In Aveiro, D., Guizzardi, G., Guédria, W.(Eds.). Advances in Enterprise Engineering XII. EEWC 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 334, 3–17. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06097-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Monahov, I., Roth, S., Schulz, C., & Schweda, C. M. 2011. “Towards an agile design of the enterprise architecture management function,” 2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, pp. 322–329.
   Google Scholar
• Colfer, L. J., & Baldwin, C. Y. (2016). The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence, and exceptions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(5), 709–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong, Y., & Romero, J. (2013). On Information Systems Complexity and Vulnerability. Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50562
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018). Platforms and Infrastructures in the digital age. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. E. (1968). How Do Committees Invent? Datamation, 14(4), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cram, W. A., Brohman, M. K., & Gallupe, R. B. (2016). Information systems control: A review and framework for emerging information systems processes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(4), 216–266. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cycyota, C. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2002). Enhancing survey response rates at the executive level: Are employee-or consumer-level techniques effective? Journal of Management, 28(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., Elbanna, A., Ravishankar, M. N., & Srivastava, S. C. (2014). Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorthuis, R. M. (2012). Project compliance with enterprise architecture. Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• France, R., & Rumpe, B. (2007). Model-driven development of complex software: A research roadmap Briand, L., Wolf, A. In Future of Software Engineering (pp. 37–54). IEEE Computer Society.https://doi.org/10.1109/FOSE.2007.14
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, H., Oliveira, M., Jenkins, M., & Popjoy, O. (1998). The focus group, a qualitative research method. Journal of Education, 1(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the AIS, 16(5), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01605
   Google Scholar
• Geraldi, J. (2009). What complexity assessments can tell us about projects: Dialogue between conception and perception. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(5), 665–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320902969208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378802500207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerow, J. E., Grover, V., Thatcher, J. B., & Roth, P. L. (2014). Looking toward the future of IT-business strategic alignment through the past: A meta-analysis. Mis Quarterly, 38(4), 1059–1085. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). “On the fintech revolution: interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services”. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, O., Liehr-Gobbers, K., & Krafft, M. (2010). Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 691–711). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Greefhorst, D., & Proper, H. A. (2011). Architecture principles – The cornerstones of enterprise architecture. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J J, Hult, F., Ringle, C. M, G. T. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F.,sJr., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning: International Journal of Strategic Management, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haki, K., Beese, J., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2020). The evolution of information systems architecture: An agent-based simulation model. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 155–184. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haki, M. K., & Legner, ca. 2013. “Enterprise architecture principles in research and practice: Insights from an exploratory analysis,” European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Utrecht, The Netherlands, p. 204.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., & Baroody, A. J. (2019). “Electronic health records and the logics of care: Complementarity and conflict in the U.S. healthcare system. Information Systems Research, 31(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, R., & Kien, S. S. (2015). Hummel’s digital transformation toward omnichannel retailing: key lessons learned. MIS Quarterly Executive, 14(2), 51–66. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol14/iss2/3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanseth, O., & Bygstad, B. 2012. “ICT architecture and project risk in inter-organizational settings”, 20th European conference on information systems (ECIS), Barcelona, Spain. Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hanseth, O., & Ciborra, C. (2007). Risk, complexity and ICT. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in pls path models: An illustration of available procedures. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 713–735). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroenke, B., Mayer, J. H., Reinecke, A., Feistenauer, H., & Hauke, J. (2013). Self-service management support system – There is an app for that. In vom Brocke, J., Hekkala, R., Ram, S., Rossi, M.(Eds.) DESRIST 2013 (pp. 420–424). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhrouit, J., & Baïna, K. (2016). Enterprise architecture complexity component based on Archimate language. In Advances in ubiquitous networking. Springer. (pp. 535–546).
   Google Scholar
• Lange, M., Mendling, J., & Recker, J. (2016). An empirical analysis of the factors and measures of enterprise architecture management success. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(5), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legner, C., Eymann, T., Hess, T., Matt, C., Boehmann, T., Drews, P., Maedche, A., Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2017). Digitalization: Opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(4), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Madnick, S. E. (2015). Understanding the dynamics of service-oriented architecture implementation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(2), 104–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1063284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Physica.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K., & Newman, M. (2008). Explaining information systems change: A punctuated socio-technical change model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 589–613. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in mis and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/249630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeen, J. D., Guimaraes, T., & Wetherbe, J. C. (1994). The Relationship between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 427–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/249523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, B., Tanriverdi, H., & Yoo, Y. 2016. “Complexity and information systems research in the emerging digital world,” MIS Quarterly, 39(4), 995–996.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of it business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merali, Y. (2006). Complexity and information systems: The emergent domain. Journal of Information Technology, 21(4), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. H., & Curley, K. F. (1991). An applied framework for classifying the complexity of knowledge-based systems. MIS Quarterly, 15(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/249450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocker, M. 2009. “What is complex about 273 applications? Untangling application architecture complexity in a case of European investment banking,” 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS 2009), Big Island, USA. IEEE Computer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mocker, M., & Boochever, J. O. (2020). How to avoid enterprise systems landscape complexity. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocker, M., & Heck, E. 2015. Business-driven IT transformation at Royal Philips: Shedding light on (Un)rewarded complexity, Thirty Sixth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2015). Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Mocker, M., Ross, J., & Kosgi, K. 2016. MIT CISR Working papers (405). MIT Center for Information Systems Research, pp. 11-15.
   Google Scholar
• Mocker, M., Weill, P., & Woerner, S. L. (2014). “Revisiting Complexity in the digital age. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(4), 73–81. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/revisiting-complexity-in-the-digital-age/
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, K. D. (2006). From enterprise architecture to it governance. elements of effective it management. Vieweg.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, E., & Pekkola, S. (2017). Using enterprise architecture artefacts in an organisation. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(3), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2015.1048831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter, S., DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(17), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15
   Google Scholar
• Piccinini, E., Gregory, R., & Muntermann, J. 2014. “Complexity in is programs: A delphi study”, 22nd European conference on information systems (ECIS 2014), Israel, 1–13. Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research - a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasubbu, N., Woodard, C. J., & Mithas, S. 2014. “Orchestrating service innovation using design moves: the dynamics of fit between service and enterprise it architectures,” in: 35th international conference on information systems (ICIS 2014). Auckland, New Zealand: Association for Information Systems, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., Klinke, A., & Asselt, M. (2011). “Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. AMBIO, 40(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0134-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribbers, P. M. A., & Schoo, K.-C. (2002). Program management and complexity of ERP implementations. Engineering Management Journal, 14(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2002.11415162
   Google Scholar
• Rigdon, E. E., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). Structural modeling of heterogeneous data with partial least squares. Review of Marketing Research 7, 255–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1548-6435(2010)0000007011
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of pls-sem in mis quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. 2015. “Smartpls 3.2.6”. Retrieved 13 November 2016. http://www.smartpls.com
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. W. (2003). Creating a strategic it architecture competency: Learning in stages. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2(1), 31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.416180
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. W., & Quaadgras, A. (2012).CISR Research Briefings XVII-9.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. C. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy. creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, R. D., Beese, J., Haki, M. K., Aier, S., & Winter, R. 2017. “Revisiting the impact of information systems architecture complexity: A complex adaptive systems perspective,” 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017), Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, R. D., Haki, K., & Aier, S. 2018. “Dynamics of control mechanisms in enterprise architecture management: a sensemaking perspective,” 39th international conference on information systems (ICIS 2018), San Francisco, USA. Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C., & Buxmann, P. (2011). Outcomes and success factors of enterprise it architecture management: Empirical insight from the international financial services industry. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. W., Marin, Z., & Matthes, F. 2014. “Adopting notions of complexity for enterprise architecture management,” in: 20th Americas conference on information systems. Savannah.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz, A., Widjaja, T., & Kaiser, J. 2013. “Complexity in enterprise architectures - conceptualization and introduction of a measure from a system theoretic perspective,” 21st European conference on information systems (ECIS), Utrecht, Netherlands: Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. E., & Vessey, I. (2002). Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 74. https://doi.org/10.1145/505248.505249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, P. B., & Scheepers, R. (2012). Towards the improved treatment of generalization of knowledge claims in is research: drawing general conclusions from samples. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, P. B., & Scheepers, R. (2015). Generalization in is research: A critique of the conflicting positions of Lee & Baskerville and Tsang & Williams. Journal Of Information Technology, 30(30), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.33
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. (2007). The contingent effects of training, technical complexity and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidorova, A., & Kappelman, L. A. (2011). Better business-it alignment through enterprise architecture: An actor-network theory perspective. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 7(1), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2014). Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 12(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-013-0213-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsson, M., Johnson, P., & Ekstedt, M. (2010). The effect of it governance maturity on it governance performance. Information Systems Management, 27(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530903455106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsson, M., Lagerström, R., & Johnson, P. 2008. “A bayesian network for it governance performance prediction,” International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC 2008), Innsbruck, Austria. Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Sivo, S. A., Saunders, C., Chang, Q., & Jiang, J. J. (2006). “How low should you go? low response rates and the validity of inference in is questionnaire research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(1), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N., & Rook, D. W. (2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice (2 ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, P., & Vessey, I. (1988). The effect of user involvement on system success: A contingency approach. MIS Quarterly, 12(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/248809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., & Konsynski, B. (2010). Complementarities between organizational it architecture and governance structure. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. 2009. “Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process”, 17th European Conference on Information Systems, In S. Newell, E. Whitley, N. Pouloudi, J. Wareham, & L. Mathiassen (Eds.), Verona, pp. 2206–2217.Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Widjaja, T., Kaiser, J., Tepel, D., & Buxmann, P. 2012. “Heterogeneity in it landscapes and monopoly power of firms: A model to quantify heterogeneity,” 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Orlando, USA. Association for Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., Mähring, M., Remus, U., & Saunders, C. (2016). Control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects - review and expanded theoretical framework. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 741–774. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.3.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R. (2014). Architectural Thinking. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(6), 361–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0352-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, R., & Fischer, R. (2007). Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 3(2), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, R., & Schelp, J. 2008. “Enterprise architecture governance: The need for a business-to-it approach,” The 23rd annual ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC2008), Mar 16- 20, 2008, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, L. M. Liebrock (ed.), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil: ACM Press, pp. 548–552.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(86)90044-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2005). Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, L., Ray, G., & Gu, B. (2011). Environmental uncertainty and it infrastructure governance: A cur-vilinear relationship. Information Systems Research, 22(2), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachman, J. A. (1987). A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276
   Google Scholar