Lawfulness by design – development and evaluation of lawful design patterns to consider legal requirements

References

• Acquisti, A., Brandimarte, L., & Hancock, J. (2022). How privacy’s past may shape its future. Science (New York, NY), 375(6578), 270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj0826
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, J., & Sankar, C. (1993). Tailoring database training for end users. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.2307/249586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building (24. print). Center for Environmental Structure series. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aljeraisy, A., Barati, M., Rana, O., & Perera, C. (2021). Privacy laws and privacy by design schemes for the internet of things. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(5), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, P. G. R. D., Denner dos Santos, C., & Silva Farias, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence regulation: A meta-framework for formulation and governance. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui.
   Google Scholar
• Avdiji, H., Elikan, D., Missonier, S., & Pigneur, Y. (2020). A design theory for visual inquiry tools. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(3), 695–734. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayala-Rivera, V., & Pasquale, L. (2018). The grace period has ended: An approach to operationalize GDPR requirements. Proceedings - 2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/re.2018.00023
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2, 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Barati, M., Petri, I., & Rana, O. F. (2019). Developing GDPR compliant user data policies for internet of things. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, Auckland, New Zealand, 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Baruh, L., Secinti, E., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2017). Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. The Journal of Communication, 67(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., Kaul, M., & Storey, V. C. (2015). Genres of inquiry in design-science research: justification and evaluation of knowledge production. MIS Quarterly, 39(3), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.3.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, D., Gao, J., Case, K., Harding, J., Young, B., Cochrane, S., & Dani, S. (2007). An engineering design knowledge reuse methodology using process modelling. Research in Engineering Design, 18(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-007-0028-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J., Heddier, M., Braeuer, S., & Knackstedt, R. (2014). Integrating regulatory requirements into information systems design and implementation. Thirty Fifth International Conference on Information Systems, Auckland 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Beverungen, D., Müller, O., Matzner, M., Mendling, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2019). Conceptualizing smart service systems. Electronic Markets, 29(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0270-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blind, K., Petersen, S. S., & Riillo, C. A. F. (2017). The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets. Research Policy, 46(1), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchers, J. (2002, April). Teaching HCI design patterns: Experience from two university courses. Patterns in practice: A workshop for UI designers (at CHI 2002 international conference on human factors of computing systems).
   Google Scholar
• Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2013). The new global rulers: The privatization of regulation in the world economy (3. pr., 1. pbk. pr). Princeton Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, T. (2017). Towards a standards-based technology architecture for RegTech. Journal of Financial Transformation, 45(1), 49–59. https://files.openpdfs.org/je1d4gbz5ob.pdf#page=49
   Google Scholar
• Chandra Kruse, L., & Nickerson, J. V. (2018). Portraying design essence. HICSS, 4433–4442. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3039322
   Google Scholar
• Chandra Kruse, L., Purao, S., & Seidel, S. (2022). How designers use design principles: design behaviors and application modes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 23(5), 1235–1270. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra Kruse, L., & Seidel, S. (2017). Tensions in design principle formulation and reuse. Designing the Digital Transformation DESRIST Research in Progress Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany, 180–188.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, L., Seidel, S., & Gregor, S. (2014). Prescriptive knowledge in is research: Conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. HICSS, 4039–4048. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.485
   Google Scholar
• CMS Legal. (2021). GDPR Enforcement Tracker. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Compagna, L., El Khoury, P., Krausová, A., Massacci, F., & Zannone, N. (2009). How to integrate legal requirements into a requirements engineering methodology for the development of security and privacy patterns. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-008-9067-3
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D., Marcolin, B., Kelley, H., & Higgins, C. (2012). Research Commentary—Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects—A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research. Information Systems Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, B. R., Pantidi, N., Coyle, D., Morrissey, K., Clarke, P., Al-Shehri, S., Earley, D., & Bandeira, N. (2017). “What can i help you with?”: Infrequent users’ experiences of intelligent personal assistants. Association for Computing Machinery, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098539
   Google Scholar
• Dickhaut, E., Janson, A., Hevner, A. R., & Leimeister, J. M. (2023). Sharing design knowledge through codification in interdisciplinary DSR collaborations, Maui, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Dickhaut, E., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2020). Codifying interdisciplinary design knowledge through patterns–the case of smart personal assistants. In15th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, DESRIST 2020, Kristiansand, Norway, December 2–4, 2020, Proceedings 15 (pp. 114–125). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). Multi-Scaffolding environment: An analysis of scaffolding and its impact on cognitive load and problem-solving ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.2190/Q58T-4388-8015-8141
   Google Scholar
• Elshan, E., Engel, C., Ebel, P., & Siemon, D. (2022). Assessing the reusability of design principles in the realm of conversational agents. DESRIST, 13229, 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06516-3_10
   Google Scholar
• European Data Protection Board. (2021). Guidelines 02/2021 on Virtual Voice Assistants. https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/public-consultations-art-704/2021/guidelines-022021-virtual-voice-assistants_de
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2018). General data protection regulation: (GDPR).
   Google Scholar
• Figl, K. (2017). Comprehension of procedural visual business process models - a literature review. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0460-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, A., Al-Nemrat, A., Ghorashi, S. A., & Davidson, J. (2021). The impact of GDPR infringement fines on the market value of firms. ECCWS 2021-Proceeding of the 20th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, 24–25. Academic Conferences International Limited. https://doi.org/10.34190/EWS.21.088
   Google Scholar
• Furey, E., & Blue, J. (2018). Alexa, emotions, privacy and GDPR. Proceedings of the 32nd International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference 32, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.212
   Google Scholar
• Gamma, E. (1995). Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Pearson Education India.
   Google Scholar
• Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object Oriented Software. AddisonWesley Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R. (1997). On the distinction between know-how, know-why, and know-what. Advances in Strategic Management, 14(14), 81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Geradin, D., Karanikioti, T., & Katsifis, D. (2021). Gdpr Myopia: How a well-intended regulation ended up favouring large online platforms - the case of ad tech. European Competition Journal, 17(1), 47–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2020.1848059
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., Kruse, L., & Seidel, S. (2020). Research perspectives: The anatomy of a design principle. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21, 1622–1652. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra, K., & Koh, C. (2019). Do legal systems affect the organizational consequences of IT innovation? Twenty-Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Munich, Germany, Cancun.
   Google Scholar
• Hadar, I., Hasson, T., Ayalon, O., Toch, E., Birnhack, M., Sherman, S., & Balissa, A. (2018). Privacy by designers: Software developers’ privacy mindset. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(1), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9517-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauswald, J., Laurenzano, M. A., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Rovinski, A., Khurana, A., Dreslinski, R. G., Mudge, T., Petrucci, V., Tang, L., & Mars, J. (2015). Sirius: An open end-to-end voice and vision personal assistant and its implications for future warehouse scale computers. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1145/2694344.2694347
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, P., & Schwabe, G. (2014). Communicating nascent design theories on innovative information systems through multi-grounded design principles, Miami, FL, USA,148–163.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, M., & Tielemans, L. (2013). Data protection by design and technology neutral law. Computer Law & Security Review, 29(5), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, A., Schulz, T., Zirfas, J., Hoffmann, H., Roßnagel, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2015). Legal compatibility as a characteristic of sociotechnical systems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0373-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, I. -H., & Lopez, C. (2016). Lessons learned from students’ cheat sheets: Generic models for designing programming study guides. IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Austin, TX, USA, 209–211.
   Google Scholar
• Huth, D., Both, A., Ahmad, J., Sauer, G., Yilmaz, F., & Matthes, F. (2020). Process and tool support for integration of privacy aspects in agile software engineering. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) Proceedings, Utah, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Janson, A., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2020). Ladders for learning: Is scaffolding the key to teaching problem solving in technology-mediated learning contexts? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(4), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2018.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2009). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Ayres, P., & Chandler, P. (2011). Contemporary cognitive load theory research: The good, the bad and the ugly. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knackstedt, R., Heddier, M., & Becker, J. (2014). Conceptual modeling in law: An interdisciplinary research agenda. Communications of the Association, 34. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03436
   Google Scholar
• Knote, R., Janson, A., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021). Value co-creation in smart services: A functional affordances perspective on smart personal assistants. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 22(2), 418–458. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koukouletsos, K., Khazaei, B., Dearden, A., & Ozcan, M. (2009). Teaching usability principles with patterns and guidelines. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89022-7_11
   Google Scholar
• Laux, J., Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2021). Taming the few: Platform regulation, independent audits, and the risks of capture created by the DMA and DSA. Computer Law & Security Review, 43, 105613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, J., Zimmerman, B., & Schaub, F. (2018). Alexa, are you listening? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274371
   Google Scholar
• Legner, C., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2020). Accumulating design knowledge with reference models: Insights from 12 years’ research into data management. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 21(3), 735–770. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Yu, L., & He, W. (2019). The impact of GDPR on global technology development. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 22(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1569186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Dinev, T., & Willison, R. (2017). Why security and privacy research lies at the centre of the information systems (IS) artefact: Proposing a bold research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 26(6), 546–563. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0066-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinova, M., & Mendling, J. (2013). The effect of process map design quality on process management success. ECIS. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/160
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N., & Matt, C. (2018). Unblackboxing the effects of privacy regulation on startup innovation. Thirty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Maruping, L. M., & Matook, S. (2020). The evolution of software development orchestration: Current state and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1831834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, L., & MacDonell, S. G. (2011). Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes. ACM Computing Surveys, 43(4), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978802.1978803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina-Borja, A. (2015). Editorial Column—Smart things as service providers: A call for convergence of disciplines to build a research agenda for the service systems of the future. Service Science, 7(1), ii–v. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2014.0090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500001
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2013). Designing business models and similar strategic objects: The Contribution of IS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(5), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F., & van Gog, T. (2006). Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, N. (2021). The Proposed Digital Markets Act (DMA): A legal and policy review. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 12(7), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpab062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter, S., Khazanchi, D., & Murphy, J. D. (2010). A design science based evaluation framework for patterns. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 41(3), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/1851175.1851177
   Google Scholar
• Peukert, C., Bechtold, S., Batikas, M., & Kretschmer, T. (2022). Regulatory spillovers and data governance: Evidence from the GDPR. Marketing Science, 41(4), 746–768. Article mksc.2021.1339. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.1339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pordesch, V., Roßnagel, A., & Schneider, M. (1999). Simulation study mobile and secure communication in healthcare. DuD, 23(2), 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2017). Pulse survey: US companies ramping up General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) budgets. https://www.Pwc.Com/us/en/press-Releases/2017/pwc-Gdpr-Compliance-Press-Release.Html.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roßnagel, A., & Schuldt, M. 2013. The simulation study as a method of evaluating socially acceptable technology design. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, H., Wessel, L., & Barquet, A. P. (2020). Accumulating design knowledge: A mechanisms-based approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(3), 771–810. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saqr, M. (2022). Is GDPR failing? a tale of the many challenges in interpretations, applications, and enforcement. International Journal of Health Sciences, 16(5), 1–2. https://ijhs.org.sa/index.php/journal/article/download/7339/1118
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A., Zierau, N., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2021). Voice as a contemporary frontier of interaction design. ECIS 2021 Proceedings, Marrakech, Morocco.
   Google Scholar
• Schoormann, T., Möller, F., & Hansen, M. R. P. (2021). How do researchers (re-)use design principles: An inductive analysis of cumulative research, Kristiansand, Norway, 188–194.
   Google Scholar
• Security Week. (2020). Zoom’s security and privacy woes violated GDPR, expert says. https://www.Securityweek.Com.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Székely, N., Gau, M., Stieger, D., Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Niehaves, B., & Lyytinen, K. (2018). Design principles for sensemaking support systems in environmental sustainability transformations. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0039-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siena, A., Mylopoulos, J., Perini, A., & Susi, A. (2009). Designing law-compliant software requirements. International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_35
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. A., & McKeen, J. D. 2006. Developments in Practice XXI: IT in the New World of Corporate Governance Reforms. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01732.
   Google Scholar
• Spiekermann, S. (2012). The challenges of privacy by design. Communications of the ACM, 55(7), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2209249.2209263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Paas, F., & C, G. W. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. R. (2001). Patterns as software design canon. ACIS 2001 Proceedings, 65.
   Google Scholar
• Tuunanen, T., & Holmström, J. (2021). Incremental accumulation of information systems design theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84655-8_10
   Google Scholar
• Tuunanen, T., Salo, M., & Li, F. (2022). Modular service design of information technology-enabled services. Journal of Service Research, 109467052210827. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221082775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aken, J. E. (2005). Valid knowledge for the professional design of large and complex design processes. Design Studies, 26(4), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanberg, A. D. (2021). Informational privacy post GDPR – end of the road or the start of a long journey? The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(1), 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1789109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Sype, Y. S., & Maalej, W. (2014). On lawful disclosure of personal user data: What should app developers do? RELAW, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/relaw.2014.6893479
   Google Scholar
• Vaujany, F. -X.D., Fomin, V. V., Haefliger, S., & Lyytinen, K. (2018). Rules, practices, and information technology: A Trifecta of organizational regulation. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 755–773. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Väyrynen, K., & Lanamäki, A. (2020). Policy ambiguity and regulative legitimacy of technology: Legal indeterminacy as result of an ambiguous taximeter regulation. Forty-First International Conference on Information Systems, Hyderabad, India, India.
   Google Scholar
• Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke, J., Winter, R., Hevner, A., & Maedche, A. (2020). Special issue editorial –accumulation and evolution of design knowledge in design science research: A journey through time and space. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23(3), 9–49. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00611
   Google Scholar
• Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Sundin, L., Murray-Rust, D., & Bach, B. (2020). Cheat sheets for data visualization techniques, Atlanta, USA, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wania, C. (2019). Exploring design patterns as evaluation tools in human computer interaction education. MWAIS, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2010). Sensemaking in organizations [Nachdr.]. foundations for organizational science. Sage Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Yskout, K., Scandariato, R., & Joosen, W. (2015). Do security patterns really help designers? International Conference on Software Engineering, Florence, Italia, 292–302.
   Google Scholar
• Zahedi, M., & Babar, M. A. (2014). Knowledge sharing for common understanding of technical specifications through artifactual culture. EASE. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601293
   Google Scholar