Design principles for artificial intelligence-augmented decision making: An action design research study

References

• Aaen, J., Nielsen, J. A., & Carugati, A. (2022). The dark side of data ecosystems: A longitudinal study of the DAMD project. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 288–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1947753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi, A., Sarker, S., & Chiang, R. H. (2016). Big data research in information systems: Toward an inclusive research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul, A., Vermeulen, J., Wang, D., Lim, B. Y., & Kankanhalli, M. (2018). Trends and trajectories for explainable, accountable and intelligible systems: An HCI research agenda. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, Canada (pp. 1–18).
   Google Scholar
• Abouzahra, M., Guenter, D., & Tan, J. (2022). Exploring physicians’ continuous use of clinical decision support systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 33(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2119172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ågerfalk, P. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence as digital agency. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1721947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altendeitering, M., Fraunhofer, I. S. S. T., & Guggenberger, T. (2021). Designing data quality tools: Findings from an action design research project at Boehringer Ingelheim. In Proceedings of the 29th European Conference on Information Systems, Marrakech, Morocco (pp. 17).
   Google Scholar
• Arnott, D. (2006). Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: A design science approach. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00208.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2005). A critical analysis of decision support systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 20(2), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2008). Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline. Decision Support Systems, 44(3), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2014). A critical analysis of decision support systems research revisited: The rise of design science. Journal of Information Technology, 29(4), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., Faraj, S., Hinds, P., von Krogh, G., & Leonardi, P. (2022). Special issue of organization Science: Emerging technologies and organizing. Organization Science, 30(3), 642–646. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1299
   Google Scholar
• Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021). The next generation of research on is use: A theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic is artifacts. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkhi, R. (2002). The effects of decision guidance and problem modeling on group decision-making. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 259–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, K., von Zahn, M., & Hinz, O. (2023). Expl (AI) ned: The impact of explainable artificial intelligence on users’ information processing. Information Systems Research, 34(4), 1582–1602. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.1199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433–1450.
   Google Scholar
• Bessen, J., Impink, S. M., Reichensperger, L., & Seamans, R. (2022). The role of data for AI startup growth. Research Policy, 51(5), 104513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessen, J., Impink, S. M., & Seamans, R. (2022). The cost of ethical AI development for AI startups. In Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Oxford, United Kingdom (pp. 92–106).
   Google Scholar
• Bouschery, S. G., Blazevic, V., & Piller, F. T. (2023). Augmenting human innovation teams with artificial intelligence: Exploring transformer‐based language models. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 40(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016). The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making. American Economic Review, 106(5), 133–39. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkart, N., & Huber, M. F. (2021). A survey on the explainability of supervised machine learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70, 245–317. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra Kruse, L., Seidel, S., & Purao, S. (2016). Making use of design principles. In Tackling Society’s Grand Challenges with Design Science: 11th International Conference, DESRIST 2016. St John’s, NL, Canada, May 23-25, 2016, 11 (pp. 37–51). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, L., Seidel, S., & Gregor, S. (2015). Prescriptive knowledge in IS research: Conceptualizing design principles in terms of materiality, action, and boundary conditions. In 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA (pp. 4039–4048). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, P., Clinton, J., Kerber, R., Khabaza, T., Reinartz, T., Shearer, C., & Wirth, R. (2000). CRISP-DM 1.0: Step-by-step data mining guide. SPSS Inc, 9(13), 1–77. https://mineracaodedados.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/crisp-dm-1-0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. W., & Koufaris, M. (2015). The impact of decision support system features on user overconfidence and risky behavior. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(6), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, V., Marchetti, A., Shrestha, Y. R., & Puranam, P. (2023). Human-AI ensembles: When can they work? Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231194968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J., Ketter, W., & Gini, M. (2010). Flexible decision support in dynamic inter-organisational networks. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(4), 436–448. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dasborough, M. T. (2023). Awe‐inspiring advancements in AI: The impact of ChatGPT on the field of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 177–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2018). Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can (even slightly) modify them. Management Science, 64(3), 1155–1170. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebel, P., Bretschneider, U., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Leveraging virtual business model innovation: A framework for designing business model development tools. Information Systems Journal, 26(5), 519–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermakova, T., Blume, J., Fabian, B., Fomenko, E., Berlin, M., & Hauswirth, M. (2021). Beyond the hype: Why do data-driven projects fail? In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA (pp. 5081).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council: Laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Fang, X., Gao, Y., & Hu, P. J. (2021). A prescriptive analytics method for cost reduction in clinical decision making. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 83–115. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/14372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerriegel, S., Shrestha, Y. R., von Krogh, G., & Zhang, C. (2022). Bringing artificial intelligence to business management. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(7), 611–613. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00512-5
   Google Scholar
• Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2022). Cognitive challenges in human-artificial intelligence collaboration: Investigating the path toward productive delegation. Information Systems Research, 33(2), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.3.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giermindl, L. M., Strich, F., Christ, O., Leicht-Deobald, U., & Redzepi, A. (2022). The dark sides of people analytics: Reviewing the perils for organisations and employees. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 410–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golovianko, M., Gryshko, S., Terziyan, V., & Tuunanen, T. (2022). Responsible cognitive digital clones as decision-makers: A design science research study. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(5), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2073278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google. (2022) Responsible AI Practices. https://ai.google/responsibilities/responsible-ai-practices/
   Google Scholar
• Gorry, G. A., & Morton, M. S. (1971). A framework for management information systems. Sloan Management Review, 13(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., Kruse, L. C., & Seidel, S. (2020). Research perspectives: The anatomy of a design principle. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(6), 1622–1652. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønsund, T., & Aanestad, M. (2020). Augmenting the algorithm: Emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(2), 101614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, W. A., Mehrizi, M. H. R., Huysman, M., Deken, F., & Feldberg, F. (2022). Resourcing with data: Unpacking the process of creating data-driven value propositions. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 31(4), 101744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in Information Systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A., & Storey, V. (2023). Research challenges for the design of human-artificial intelligence systems (HAIS). ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3549547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P. (1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. The Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/258105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2020). Competing in the age of AI: Strategy and leadership when algorithms and networks run the world. Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iivari, J. (2015). Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iivari, J., Rotvit Perlt Hansen, M., & Haj-Bolouri, A. (2021). A proposal for minimum reusability evaluation of design principles. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(3), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1793697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, H., Padmanabhan, B., Pavlou, P. A., & Raghu, T. S. (2021). Editorial for the special section on humans, algorithms, and augmented intelligence: The future of work, organizations, and society. Information Systems Research, 32(3), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J., & Gaba, V. (2020). Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 267–302. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, M. P., Su, N., Austin, R. D., & Sundaram, A. K. (2021). Why so many data science projects fail to deliver. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(3), 85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kamis, A., Koufaris, M., & Stern, T. (2008). Using an attribute-based decision support system for user-customized products online: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keding, C., & Meissner, P. (2021). Managerial overreliance on AI-augmented decision-making processes: How the use of AI-based advisory systems shapes choice behavior in R&D investment decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171, 120970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, P. G. (1980). Decision support systems: A research perspective. Decision support systems: Issues and challenges, International Institute for Applied systems Analysis (IIASA). Proceedings Series, 11, 23–27. https://books.google.ch/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LF0hBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA23&ots=n3GZiEbnSB&sig=9-r9bblS-oMNS2UXUeAO9qCRqMA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Klör, B., Monhof, M., Beverungen, D., Bräuer, S., Niehaves, B., Tuunanen, T., & Peffers, K. (2018). Design and evaluation of a model-driven decision support system for repurposing electric vehicle batteries. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0044-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordzadeh, N., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2022). Algorithmic bias: Review, synthesis, and future research directions. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuguoglu, B. K., van der Voort, H., & Janssen, M. (2021). The giant leap for smart cities: Scaling up smart city artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) initiatives. Sustainability, 13(21), 12295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebovitz, S., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Levina, N. (2022). To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organization Science, 33(1), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, D. E., & Elam, J. J. (1995). The impact of executive information systems on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Organization Science, 6(6), 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.6.645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilien, G. L., Rangaswamy, A., Van Bruggen, G. H., & Starke, K. (2004). DSS effectiveness in marketing resource allocation decisions: Reality vs. perception. Information Systems Research, 15(3), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, T., & Gregor, S. (2004). User participation in decision support systems development: Influencing system outcomes. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(4), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K., Nickerson, J. V., & King, J. L. (2021). Metahuman systems= humans+ machines that learn. Journal of Information Technology, 36(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220915917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabey, B. (2018). pyLdavis: Python library for interactive topic model visualization. port of the R LDAvis package. https://github.com/bmabey/pyldavis.
   Google Scholar
• Maedche, A., Gregor, S., & Parsons, J. (2021). Mapping design contributions in information systems research: The design research activity framework. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 49(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04914
   Google Scholar
• Mandviwalla, M. (2015). Generating and justifying design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(5), 3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Miah, S. J., Gammack, J. G., & McKay, J. (2019). A metadesign theory for tailorable decision support. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(5), 4. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., Lundström, J. E., & Popovič, A. (2022). Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2026621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, S., & Schwenk, C. R. (1995). The effects of information technology on strategic decision making. Journal of Management Studies, 32(3), 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00777.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D. G. (2020). Humans and technology: Forms of conjoined agency in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A., Tuunanen, T., Gardner, L., & Sheridan, D. (2021). Design principles for learning analytics information systems in higher education. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 541–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1816144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Briggs, R. O., Derrick, D. C., & Schwabe, G. (2015). The last research mile: Achieving both rigor and relevance in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(3), 10–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1094961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). Artificial Intelligence. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in it research. A call to theorizing the it artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan, B., Sahoo, N., & Burton-Jones, A. (2022). Machine learning in Information Systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 46(1), iii–xix.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S. L., Li, M., Pee, L. G., & Sandeep, M. S. (2021). Sustainability design principles for a wildlife management analytics system: An action design research. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(4), 452–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1811786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., & Niehaves, B. (2018). Design science research genres: Introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1458066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, D. J. (2001). Supporting decision-makers: An expanded framework. Informing Science, 1(1), 1901–1915. https://doi.org/10.28945/2384
   Google Scholar
• Rai, A. (2016). Editor’s comments: Synergies between big data and theory. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), iii–ix.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, A., Constantinides, P., & Sarker, S. (2019). Next generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii–ix.
   Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana, N. P., Chatterjee, S., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Akter, S. (2022). Understanding dark side of artificial intelligence (AI) integrated business analytics: Assessing firm’s operational inefficiency and competitiveness. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 364–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1955628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ransbotham, S., Khodabandeh, S., Fehling, R., LaFountain, B., & Kiron, D. (2019). Winning with AI: Pioneers combine strategy, organizational behavior, and technology. MIT Sloan Management Review and Boston Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• Remus, W. E., & Kottemann, J. E. (1986). Toward intelligent decision support systems: An artificially intelligent statistician. MIS Quarterly, 10(4) , 403–418. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinta-Kahila, T., Someh, I., Gillespie, N., Indulska, M., & Gregor, S. (2022). Algorithmic decision-making and system destructiveness: A case of automatic debt recovery. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1960905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samtani, S., Chai, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). Linking exploits from the dark web to known vulnerabilities for proactive cyber threat intelligence: An attention-based deep structured semantic model. MIS Quarterly, 46(2), 911–946. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2022/15392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoemaker, P. J. (1982). The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(2) , 529–563. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2724488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, S., Chandra Kruse, L., Székely, N., Gau, M., Stieger, D., Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Niehaves, B., & Lyytinen, K. (2018). Design principles for sensemaking support systems in environmental sustainability transformations. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-017-0039-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senoner, J., Netland, T., & Feuerriegel, S. (2022). Using explainable artificial intelligence to improve process quality: Evidence from semiconductor manufacturing. Management Science, 68(8), 5704–5723. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., Mithas, S., & Kankanhalli, A. (2014). Transforming decision-making processes: A research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(4), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, Y. R., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, Y. R., Krishna, V., & von Krogh, G. (2021). Augmenting organizational decision-making with deep learning algorithms: Principles, promises, and challenges. Journal of Business Research, 123, 588–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, Y. R., von Krogh, G., & Feuerriegel, S. (2023). Building open-source AI. Nature Computational Science, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4614280
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decision. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, D., Ying, W., Zhang, X., & Feng, L. (2019). Developing a blockchain-based loyalty programs system to hybridize business and charity: An action design research. International Conference on Information Systems 2019 Proceedings, Munich, Germany (pp. 6).
   Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M., Beath, C. M., & Ross, J. W. (2019). Using AI to enhance business operations. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(4), 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te’eni, D., Yahav, I., Zagalsky, A., Schwartz, D., Silverman, G., Cohen, D., Mann, Y., & Dafna, L. (2023). Reciprocal human-machine learning: A theory and an instantiation for the case of message classification. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03518
   Google Scholar
• Tinguely, P., Shrestha, Y. R., & von Krogh, G. (2020). How does your labor force react to COVID-19? Employing social media analytics for preemptive decision making. California Management Review. https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2020/08/social-media-analytics/
   Google Scholar
• Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (1999). Evaluating the impact of DSS, cognitive effort, and incentives on strategy selection. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/257550
   Google Scholar
• Tuunanen, T., & Peffers, K. (2018). Population targeted requirements acquisition. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(6), 686–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1476015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2021). When the machine meets the expert: An ethnography of developing AI for hiring. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1557–1580. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2012). A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In International conference on design science research in information systems, Las Vegas, USA (pp. 423–438). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G. (2018). Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(4), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G., Ben-Menahem, S. M., & Shrestha, Y. R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Strategizing: Prospects and Challenges. Strategic Management: State of the Field and Its Future (pp. 625–646). New York: Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/39240/chapter/338769107
   Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G., & Haefliger, S. (2010). Opening up design science: The challenge of designing for reuse and joint development. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(4), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, M., Saunders, C., & Marabelli, M. (2020). Big-data business models: A critical literature review and multiperspective research framework. Journal of Information Technology, 35(1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396219896811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, D., Ma, L., Liu, J., Macke, S., Song, S., & Parameswaran, A. (2018). Accelerating human-in-the-loop machine learning: Challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the second workshop on data management for end-to-end machine learning, Houston, USA (pp. 1–4).
   Google Scholar
• Xue, M., Cao, X., Feng, X., Gu, B., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Is college education less necessary with AI? Evidence from firm-level labor structure changes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 39(3), 865–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2022.2096542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar