1,557
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Single case experimental designs: Introduction to a special issue of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

, , &
Pages 305-314 | Received 04 Mar 2013, Accepted 06 Mar 2013, Published online: 25 Apr 2014

REFERENCES

  • Baek, E., Moeyaert, M., Petit-Bois, M., Beretvas, S. N., Van de Noortgate, W., & Ferron, J. (2014). The use of multilevel analysis for integrating single-case experimental design results within a study and across studies. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.835740
  • Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Beretvas, S. N., & Chung, H. (2008). A review of meta-analyses of single-subject experimental designs: Methodological issues and practice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, 129–141. doi: 10.1080/17489530802446302
  • Borckardt, J., & Nash, M. (2014). Simulation modelling analysis for small sets of single-subject data collected over time. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2014.895390
  • Brossart, D. F., Vannest, K., Davis, J., & Patience, M. (2014). Incorporating nonoverlap indices with visual analysis for quantifying intervention effectiveness in single-case experimental designs. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.868361
  • Byiers, B. J., Reichle, J., & Symons, F. J. (2012). Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 397–414. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0036)
  • Edgington, E. S. (1983). Response-guided experimentation. Contemporary Psychology, 28, 64–65.
  • Galassi, J. P., & Gersh, T. L. (1993). Myths, misconceptions, and missed opportunity: Single-case designs and counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 525–531. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.40.4.525
  • Gast, D. L. (Ed.). (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. London: Routledge.
  • Gedo, P. M. (2000). Single case studies in psychotherapy research. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 16, 274–280. doi: 10.1037/0736-9735.16.2.274
  • Heyvaert, M., & Onghena, P. (2014). Analysis of single-case data: Randomisation tests for measures of effect size. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.818564
  • Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. doi: 10.1177/001440290507100203
  • Howick, J., Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P., Greenhaigh, T., Heneghan, C., Liberati, A., … Thornton, H. (2011). The 2011 Oxford CEBM Evidence Table (Introductory Document). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Retrieved from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653
  • Institute of Education Sciences. (2013). Request for applications: Statistical and research methodology in education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/funding/pdf/2014_84305D.pdf
  • Jamieson, M., Cullen, B., McGee-Lennon, M., Brewster, S., & Evans, J. J. (2014). The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.825632
  • Jenson, W. R., Clark, E., Kircher, J. C., & Kristjansson, S. D. (2007). Statistical reform: Evidence-based practice, meta-analyses, and single subject designs. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 483–493. doi: 10.1002/pits.20240
  • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38. doi: 10.1177/0741932512452794
  • Lane, J., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.815636
  • Ledford, J., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Measuring procedural fidelity in behavioural research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.861352
  • Ma, H. H. (2006). An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior Modification, 30, 598–617. doi: 10.1177/0145445504272974
  • O'Neill, B., & Findlay, G. (2014). Single case experimental designs in neurobehavioural rehabilitation: Preliminary findings on biofeedback in the treatment of challenging behaviour. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24.
  • Parker, R. I., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. J. (2007). Percentage of all non-overlapping data: An alternative to PND. Journal of Special Education, 40, 194–204. doi: 10.1177/00224669070400040101
  • Rabin, C. (1981). The single-case design in family therapy evaluation research. Family Process, 20, 351–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1981.00351.x
  • Rindskopf, D. (2014). Bayesian analysis of data from single case designs. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.866903
  • Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & The CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Medicine, 8:18. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18
  • Shadish, W. R., Hedges, L. V., Pustejovsky, J. E., Boyajian, J. G., Sullivan, K. J., Andrade, A., & Barrientos, J. L. (2014). A d-statistic for single-case designs that is equivalent to the usual between-groups d-statistic. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.819021
  • Shadish, W. R., & Sullivan, K. J. (2011). Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 971–980. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0111-y
  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century.
  • Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17, 510–550. doi: 10.1037/a0029312
  • Solmi, F., & Onghena, P. (2014). Combining P-values in replicated single-case experiments with multivariate outcome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2014.881747
  • Svanberg, J., & Evans, J. J. (2014). Impact of SenseCam on memory, identity and mood in Korsakoff's syndrome: A single case experimental design study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.814573
  • Swaminathan, H., Rogers, H. J., Horner, R., Sugai, G., & Smolkowski, K. (2014). Regression models for the analysis of single case designs. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24.
  • Tate, R. L., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 385–401. doi: 10.1080/09602010802009201
  • Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., McDonald, S., Togher, L., & Rosenkoetter, U. (2014). The conduct and report of single-case research: Strategies to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24.
  • Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakima, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & McDonald, S. (2013). Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 619–638. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.824383
  • Tunnard, C., & Wilson, B. (2014). Comparison of neuropsychological rehabilitation techniques for unilateral neglect: An ABACADAEAF single-case experimental design. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.872041
  • Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2008). A multilevel meta-analysis of single-subject experimental design studies. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2, 142–151. doi: 10.1080/17489530802505362
  • Williams, J. J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008). Why are people bad at detecting randomness? Because it is hard. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 64–70). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Wilson, B. A. (2011). Cutting edge developments in neuropsychological rehabilitation and possible future directions. Brain Impairment, 12, 33–42. doi: 10.1375/brim.12.1.33
  • Winkens, I., Ponds, R., Pouwels-van den Nieuwenhof, C., Eilander, H., & van Heugten, C. (2014). Using single-case experimental design methodology to evaluate the effects of the ABC method for nursing staff on verbal aggressive behaviour after acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24. doi:10.1080/09602011.2014.901229

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.