Too harts, won sole: Using dysgraphia treatment to address homophone representation

References

• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1996). Celex2. Linguistic data consortium, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M. (1999). Treating acquired writing impairment: Strengthening graphemic representations. Aphasiology, 13(9–11), 767–785. doi: 10.1080/026870399401867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., Hirsch, F. M., & Rewega, M. A. (2002). Successful single-word writing treatment: Experimental analyses of four cases. Aphasiology, 16(4–6), 473–491. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M. (1987). The rites of righting writing: Homophone remediation in acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4(3), 365–384. doi: 10.1080/02643298708252044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Osborne, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 151–168. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E., & Feng, X. (2009). Language proficiency and executive control in proactive interference: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual children and adults. Brain and Language, 109(2–3), 93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann, B., Blanken, G., & Nickels, L. (2002). The representation of homophones: Evidence from remediation. Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 1115–1136. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann, B., Cholin, J., Jorschick, A., Croot, K., Hameau, S., & Nickels, L. (2018). Is the homophone advantage influenced by post-lexical effects? Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann, B., & Nickels, L. (2008a). Homographic and heterographic homophones in speech production: Does orthography matter? Cortex, 44(6), 683–697. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2006.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann, B., & Nickels, L. (2008b). The representation of homophones: More evidence from the remediation of anomia. Cortex, 44(3), 276–293. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2006.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biran, M., Gvion, A., Sharabi, L., & Gil, M. (2013). The representation of homophones in the phonological lexicon: Additional evidence from Hebrew. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 94, 86–87. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.041
   Google Scholar
• Blanken, G. (1989). Wortfindungsstorungen und Verbales Lernen bei Aphasie- Eine Einzelfallstudie. Neurolinguistik, 2, 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsdon, R., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2005). Treatment of irregular word spelling in developmental surface dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(2), 213–251. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2009). Distinctions between orthographic long-term memory and working memory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(8), 724–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Bi, Y. (2001). The specific-word frequency effect: Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1430–1450. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), The psychology of reading: Attention and performance, VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Dorjee, D., & Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H. (2011). Long-term repetition priming in spoken and written word production: Evidence for a contribution of phonology to handwriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. (2007). Match calculator. Retrieved from http://www.pc.rhul.ac.uk/staff/c.davis/utilities/matchcalc/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65–70. doi: 10.3758/BF03206399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 535–557. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5(4), 313–349. doi: 10.1080/01690969008407066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Lawler, E. N., Harris, H. D., & Gordon, J. K. (2004). Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2–4), 125–145. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druks, J., & Masterson, J. (2000). An action and object naming battery. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, E. (2004). Phonics: A large phoneme - Grapheme frequency count revised. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 85–98. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. A., & Caramazza, A. (1985). The Johns Hopkins university dysgraphia battery. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Gvion, A., Biran, M., Sharabi, L., & Gil, M. (2015). Learning from naming treatment on the phonological representation of homophones. Presented at the American Speech Hearing Association (ASHA) convention, Colorado, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L., Olson, A., & Humphreys, G. (2012). Rehabilitation of spelling in a participant with a graphemic buffer impairment: The role of orthographic neighbourhood in remediating the serial position effect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22(6), 890–919. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2012.709872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Best, W., & Nickels, L. (2015). Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward. Aphasiology, 29(5), 526–562. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.985884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Hickin, J., Redmond, T., Clark, P., & Best, W. (2006). Re-visiting “semantic facilitation” of word retrieval for people with aphasia: Facilitation yes but semantic no. Cortex, 42(6), 946–962. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70439-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, M. J. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 824–843. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E. (2013). vwr: Useful functions for visual word recognition research. R package version 0.3. 0.
   Google Scholar
• Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Brunsdon, R. (2008). Predicting generalization in the training of irregular-word spelling: Treating lexical spelling deficits in a child. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(3), 343–375. doi: 10.1080/02643290802003000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajenbrink, T., Nickels, L., & Kohnen, S. (2017). No effect of orthographic neighbourhood in treatment with two cases of acquired dysgraphia. Aphasiology, 31(5), 595–628. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1218435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(01), 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L., Chen, Q., & Verkuilen, J. (2015). Friends and foes in the lexicon: Homophone naming in aphasia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 77–94. doi: 10.1037/a0037778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., Kittredge, A. K., & Dell, S. G. (2010). Effects of near and distant phonological neighbors on picture naming. Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (2002). A dissociation between orthographic awareness and spelling production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(1), 43–73. doi: 10.1017/S0142716402000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Kane, A. (2002). Remediation of deficits affecting different components of the spelling process. Aphasiology, 16(4–6), 439–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2013). Cross-lingisitic treatment generalisation in Welsh-English Bilingual Aphasia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bangor University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sage, K., & Ellis, A. (2006). Using orthographic neighbours to treat a case of graphemic buffer disorder. Aphasiology, 20(9), 851–870. doi: 10.1080/02687030600738945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 228–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton, J. R., & Weinrich, M. (1997). Further evidence of a dissociation between output phonological and orthographic lexicons: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 105–129. doi: 10.1080/026432997381637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M.-J., Roberts, J., & Leek, E. C. (2011). Do reading processes differ in transparent versus opaque orthographies? A study of acquired dyslexia in Welsh/English bilinguals. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28(8), 546–563. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.698986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnes, G. R., Bolker, B., Gorjanc, G., Grothendieck, G., Korosec, A., Lumley, T., … Rogers, J. (2014). Gdata: Various R programming tools for data manipulation. R Package Version, 2(3), 35.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Monsell, S. (1992). The locus of repetition priming of spoken word production. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44(4), 723–761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar