768
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The experience and acceptability of smartphone reminder app training for people with acquired brain injury: a mixed methods study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1263-1290 | Received 20 Nov 2020, Accepted 19 Jan 2021, Published online: 09 Feb 2021

References

  • 24meLtd. (2018). 24me Smart Personal Assistant (V. 5.5.6) [Mobile application software]. In https://www.twentyfour.me
  • 6WunderkinderGmbH. (2015). Wunderlist: To-do list & tasks (V. 3.4.15) [Mobile application software]. In https://www.wunderlist.com
  • Andreassen, M., Hemmingsson, H., Boman, I.-L., Danielsson, H., & Jaarsma, T. (2020). Feasibility of an intervention for patients with cognitive impairment using an interactive digital calendar with mobile phone reminders (RemindMe) to improve the performance of activities in everyday life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072222
  • Ayala, G. X., & Elder, J. P. (2011). Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 71(Suppl 1(01)), S69–S79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00241.x
  • Balapour, A., Reychav, I., Sabherwal, R., & Azuri, J. (2019). Mobile technology identity and self-efficacy: Implications for the adoption of clinically supported mobile health apps. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.005
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Brett, C. E., Sykes, C., & Pires-Yfantouda, R. (2017). Interventions to increase engagement with rehabilitation in adults with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(6), 959–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2015.1090459
  • Brown, J., & Wollersheim, M. (2019). Exploring assistive technology use to support cognition in college students with histories of mild traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1428371
  • Chang, C., Hinze, A., Bowen, J., Gilbert, L., & Starkey, N. (2018). Mymemory: A mobile memory assistant for people with traumatic brain injury. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 117, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.02.006
  • Charters, E., Gillett, L., & Simpson, G. K. (2015). Efficacy of electronic portable assistive devices for people with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25(1), 82–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2014.942672
  • Chu, Y., Brown, P., Harniss, M., Kautz, H., & Johnson, K. (2014). Cognitive support technologies for people with TBI: Current usage and challenges experienced. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9(4), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.823631
  • Chwalisz, K., Shah, S., & Hand, K. (2008). Facilitating rigorous qualitative research in rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53(3), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012998
  • Cicerone, K. D., Goldin, Y., Ganci, K., Rosenbaum, A., Wethe, J. V., Langenbahn, D. M., Malec, J. F., Bergquist, T. F., Kingsley, K., Nagele, D., Trexler, L., Fraas, M., Bogdanova, Y., & Harley, J. P. (2019). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(8), 1515–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011
  • Clare, L., & Jones, R. S. (2008). Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impairment: A critical review. Neuropsychology Review, 18(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-008-9051-4
  • Clark, F., Sanders, K., Carlson, M., Blanche, E., & Jackson, J. (2007). Synthesis of habit theory. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 27((1_suppl)), 7S–23S. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492070270S103
  • CoziInc. (2018). Cozi Family Organiser (V. 9.8.8) [Mobile application software]. In https://www.cozi.com
  • Cristofori, I., & Levin, H. S.. (2015). Traumatic brain injury and cognition. In J. Grafman & A. M. Salazar (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 128). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63521-1.00037-6
  • das Nair, R., & Lincoln, N. B. (2013). The effectiveness of memory rehabilitation following neurological disabilities: A qualitative inquiry of patient perspectives. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23(4), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.792290
  • de Joode, E., van Boxtel, M. P. J., Verhey, F. R., & van Heugten, C. M. (2012). Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: Exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users. Brain Injury, 26(10), 1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.667590
  • De Joode, E. A., Van Heugten, C. M., Verhey, F. R., & Van Boxtel, M. P. (2013). Effectiveness of an electronic cognitive aid in patients with acquired brain injury: A multicentre randomised parallel-group study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2012.726632
  • Downing, M., Bragge, P., & Ponsford, J. (2019). Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: A survey of current practice in Australia. Brain Impairment, 20(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2018.12
  • Ehlhardt, L. A., Sohlberg, M. M., Kennedy, M., Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., Turkstra, L., & Yorkston, K. (2008). Evidence-based practice guidelines for instructing individuals with neurogenic memory impairments: What have we learned in the past 20 years? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(3), 300–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010701733190
  • Engel, L., Chui, A., Goverover, Y., & Dawson, D. R. (2019). Optimising activity and participation outcomes for people with self-awareness impairments related to acquired brain injury: An interventions systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 29(2), 163–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2017.1292923
  • Engström, A.-L. L., Lexell, J., & Lund, M. L. (2010). Difficulties in using everyday technology after acquired brain injury: A qualitative analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038120903191806
  • Erikson, A., Karlsson, G., Soderstrom, M., & Tham, K. (2004). A training apartment with electronic aids to daily living: Lived experiences of persons with brain damage [clinical report]. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.58.3.261
  • Evald, L. (2015). Prospective memory rehabilitation using smartphones in patients with TBI: What do participants report? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25(2), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2014.970557
  • Evald, L. (2018). Prospective memory rehabilitation using smartphones in patients with TBI. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(19), 2250–2259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1333633
  • Evans, J. J., Wilson, B. A., Needham, P., & Brentnall, S. U. E. (2003). Who makes good use of memory aids? Results of a survey of people with acquired brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9(6), 925–935. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617703960127
  • Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
  • Fleming, J. M., Shum, D., Strong, J., & Lightbody, S. (2005). Prospective memory rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury: A compensatory training programme. Brain Injury, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050410001720059
  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  • Hills, A. M. (2011). Foolproof guide to statistics using IBM SPSS. Pearson.
  • Jamieson, M., Jack, R., O'Neill, B., Cullen, B., Lennon, M., Brewster, S., & Evans, J. (2019). Technology to encourage meaningful activities following brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1594402
  • Jamwal, R., Callaway, L., Ackerl, J., Farnworth, L., & Winkler, D. (2017). Electronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: Implications for occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 80(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616678634
  • Jokinen, H., Melkas, S., Ylikoski, R., Pohjasvaara, T., Kaste, M., Erkinjuntti, T., & Hietanen, M. (2015). Post-stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery. European Journal of Neurology, 22(9), 1288–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12743
  • Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does It really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7
  • Kaye, H. S., Yeager, P., & Reed, M. (2008). Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assistive Technology, 20(4), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2008.10131946
  • Kettlewell, J., das Nair, R., & Radford, K. (2019). A systematic review of personal smart technologies used to improve outcomes in adults with acquired brain injuries. Clinical Rehabilitation, 33(11), 1705–1712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519865774
  • Larsson-Lund, M., Lövgren-engström, A.-L., & Lexell, J. (2011). Using everyday technology to compensate for difficulties in task performance in daily life: Experiences in persons with acquired brain injury and their significant others. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(5), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.574309
  • MacQueen, K. M., & Guest, G. (2008). Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research [Book]. AltaMira Press. http://ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=632760&site=ehost-live&scope=site
  • McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
  • Noé, E., Ferri, J., Caballero, M. C., Villodre, R., Sanchez, A., & Chirivella, J. (2005). Self-awareness after acquired brain injury–predictors and rehabilitation. Journal of Neurology, 252(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0625-2
  • Nygård, L., & Starkhammar, S. (2007). The use of everyday technology by people with dementia living alone: Mapping out the difficulties. Aging Mental Health, 11(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860600844168
  • O'Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Drabble, S. J., Rudolph, A., & Hewison, J. (2013). What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review. BMJ Open, 3(6), e002889. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889
  • Ownsworth, T. (2018). Errors: Friend or foe?: The theory and evidence base for error-based learning. In C. Haslam & R. P. Kessels (Eds.), Errorless learning in neuropsychological rehabilitation: Mechanisms, efficacy and application (pp. 164–179). Routledge.
  • Ownsworth, T., Fleming, J., Tate, R., Beadle, E., Griffin, J., Kendall, M., Schmidt, J., Lane-Brown, A., Chevignard, C., & Shum, D. (2017). Do people with severe traumatic brain injury benefit from making errors? A randomized controlled trial of error-based and errorless learning. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31(0), 1072–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317740635
  • Petrisor, B., & Bhandari, M. (2007). The hierarchy of evidence: Levels and grades of recommendation. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 41(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.30519
  • QSR International. (2019). NVivo12 qualitative data analysis software. In https://qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-products/ (Version 12.6.0.959) [Software]. QSR International
  • Ramirez-Hernandez, D., Stolwyk, R. J., Ownsworth, T., & Wong, D. (2020). A comparison of systematic instruction, error-based learning and trial and error to train the use of smartphone memory apps after acquired brain injury: A three-armed phase II randomised controlled trial study protocol. Brain Impairment, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2020.10
  • Ramirez-Hernandez, D., Wong, D., Ownsworth, T., & Stolwyk, R. J. (under review). Which training methods are effective for learning new smartphone memory apps after acquired brain injury? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing trial and error, systematic instruction and error-based learning. Disability and Rehabilitation.
  • Riley, G. A., & Venn, P. (2015). A comparison of automatic and intentional instructions when using the method of vanishing cues in acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2014.941294
  • Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017). Acceptability of healthcare interventions: An overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
  • Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2009). Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford library of psychology.
  • Svoboda, E., Richards, B., Leach, L., & Mertens, V. (2012). PDA and smartphone use by individuals with moderate-to-severe memory impairment: Application of a theory-driven training programme. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22(3), 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2011.652498
  • Svoboda, E., Richards, B., Polsinelli, A., & Guger, S. (2010). A theory-driven training programme in the use of emerging commercial technology: Application to an adolescent with severe memory impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 20(4), 562–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011003669918
  • Tham, K., & Kielhofner, G. (2003). Impact of the social environment on occupational experience and performance among persons with unilateral neglect. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.4.403
  • Vaezipour, A., Whelan, B. M., Wall, K., & Theodoros, D. (2019). Acceptance of rehabilitation technology in adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals: A systematic review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 34(4), E67–e82. https://doi.org/10.1097/htr.0000000000000462
  • Vallat-Azouvi, C., Paillat, C., Bercovici, S., Morin, B., Paquereau, J., Charanton, J., Ghout, I., & Azouvi, P. (2018). Subjective complaints after acquired brain injury: Presentation of the brain injury complaint questionnaire (BICoQ). Journal of Neuroscience Research, 96(4), 601–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24180
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
  • Vincent, S., & O'Mahoney, J. (2018). Critical realism and qualitative research: An introductory overview. In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), SAGE handbook of qualitative research methods (Vol. 1, pp. 36–78). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526430212
  • Waldron, B., Grimson, J., Carton, S., & Blanco-Campal, A. (2012). Effectiveness of an unmodified personal digital assistant as a compensatory strategy for prospective memory failures in adults with an ABI. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 33(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2012.659044
  • Withiel, T. D., Sharp, V. L., Wong, D., Ponsford, J. L., Warren, N., & Stolwyk, R. J. (2018). Understanding the experience of compensatory and restorative memory rehabilitation: A qualitative study of stroke survivors. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 30(3), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2018.1479275
  • Wong, D., Wang, Q. J., Stolwyk, R., & Ponsford, J. (2017). Do smartphones have the potential to support cognition and Independence following stroke? Brain Impairment, 18(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2017.10
  • Wu, Y. P., Thompson, D., Aroian, K. J., McQuaid, E. L., & Deatrick, J. A. (2016). Commentary: Writing and evaluating qualitative research reports. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 41(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsw032

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.