The reliability and validity of brief cognitive screening tools used in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

References

• Abd Razak, M. A., Ahmad, N. A., Chan, Y. Y., Mohamad Kasim, N., Yusof, M., Abdul Ghani, M. K. A., Omar, M., Abd Aziz, F. A., & Jamaluddin, R. (2019). Validity of screening tools for dementia and mild cognitive impairment among the elderly in primary health care: A systematic review. Public Health, 169, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adjorlolo, S. (2016). Ecological validity of executive function tests in moderate traumatic brain injury in Ghana. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(Suppl 1), 1517–1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1172667
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adjorlolo, S. (2018). Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of executive function tests in moderate traumatic brain injury in Ghana. Assessment, 25(4), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116646445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barman, A., Chatterjee, A., & Bhide, R. (2016). Cognitive impairment and rehabilitation strategies after traumatic brain injury. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 38(3), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.183086
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bin Zahid, A., Hubbard, M., Dammavalam, V., Balser, D., Pierre, G., Kim, A., Kolecki, R., Mehmood, T., Wall, S. P., Frangos, S. G., Huang, P. P., Tupper, D. E., Barr, W., & Samadani, U. (2018). Assessment of acute head injury in an emergency department population using sport concussion assessment tool - 3rd edition. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 25, 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2016.1248765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgaro, S. R., Kwasnica, C., Cutter, N., & Alcott, S. (2003). The use of the BNI screen for higher cerebral functions in assessing disorientation after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(3), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200305000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgaro, S. R., & Prigatano, G. P. (2002). Early cognitive and affective sequelae of traumatic brain injury: A study using the BNI screen for higher cerebral functions. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17(6), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200212000-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. (2014). Screening tools to identify adults with cognitive impairment associated with a cerebrovascular accident or traumatic brain injury: Diagnostic accuracy. https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/htis/nov-2014/RB0751%20Cognitive%20Assessments%20CVA%20and%20TBI%20Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., Wang, Y.-Z., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Xie, F., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y.-H., Guo, J., & Fei, X. (2021). Comparative analysis of rowland universal dementia assessment scale and mini-mental state examination in cognitive assessment of traumatic brain injury patients. NeuroRehabilitation, 49(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-210044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y.-H., & Zhang, S. (2022). Reliability and validity of the rowland universal dementia assessment scale for patients with traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 29(5), 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1856850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., Eyolfson, E., Salberg, S., & Mychasiuk, R. (2021). Traumatic brain injury in adolescence: A review of the neurobiological and behavioural underpinnings and outcomes. Developmental Review, 59, Article 100943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone, K. D., & Azulay, J. (2002). Diagnostic utility of attention measures in postconcussion syndrome. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(3), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.16.3.280.13849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldren, R. L., Kelly, M. P., Parish, R. V., Dretsch, M., & Russell, M. L. (2010). Evaluation of the military acute concussion evaluation for use in combat operations more than 12 h after injury. Military Medicine, 175(7), 477–481. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-09-00258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, W. R., Arrieux, J. P., Ivins, B. J., Schwab, K. A., & Qashu, F. M. (2018). A comparison of four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools to a traditional neuropsychological test battery in service members with and without mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, B., O’Neill, B., Evans, J. J., Coen, R. F., & Lawlor, B. A. (2007). A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 78(8), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.095414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Martino, M., Santini, B., Cappelletti, G., Mazzotta, A., Rasi, M., Bulgarelli, G., Annicchiarico, L., Marcocci, A., & Talacchi, A. (2020). The quality of measurement properties of neurocognitive assessment in brain tumor clinical trials over the last 30 years: A COSMIN checklist-based approach. Neurological Sciences, 41(11), 3105–3121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04477-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeyere, N., Riddoch, M. J., Slavkova, E. D., Bickerton, W.-L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS): Validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 883–894. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doninger, N. A., Bode, R. K., Heinemann, A. W., & Ambrose, C. (2000). Rating scale analysis of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(1), 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200002000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doninger, N. A., Ehde, D. M., Bode, R. K., Knight, K., Bombardier, C. H., & Heinemann, A. W. (2006). Measurement properties of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (cognistat) in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.51.4.281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettenhofer, M. L., Hungerford, L. D., & Agtarap, S. (2021). Multimodal neurocognitive screening of military personnel with a history of mild traumatic brain injury using the Bethesda eye & attention measure. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 36(6), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, T. D., Red, S. D., Chuang, A. Z., Jones, E. B., McCarthy, J. J., Patel, S. S., & Sereno, A. B. (2016). Detection of subtle cognitive changes after mTBI using a novel tablet-based task. Journal of Neurotrauma, 33(13), 1237–1246. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.3990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, L., Mccrea, M., & Baggett, M. (2008). The military acute concussion evaluation (MACE). Journal of Special Operations Medicine, 8, 68–77.
   Google Scholar
• Frenette, L. C., Tinawi, S., Correa, J. A., Alturki, A. Y., LeBlanc, J., Feyz, M., & de Guise, E. (2019). Early detection of cognitive impairments with the Montreal cognitive assessment in patients with uncomplicated and complicated mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 33(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1542506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaber, T. A.-Z. K. (2008). Evaluation of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination’s validity in a brain injury rehabilitation setting. Brain Injury, 22(7-8), 589–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050802132461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Kumar, N. K. (2009). Indian adaptation of the cognistat: Psychometric properties of a cognitive screening tool for patients of traumatic brain injury. The Indian Journal of Neurotrauma, 6(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0973-0508(09)80006-3
   Google Scholar
• Guskiewicz, K. M., Register-Mihalik, J., McCrory, P., McCrea, M., Johnston, K., Makdissi, M., Dvořák, J., Davis, G., & Meeuwisse, W. (2013). Evidence-based approach to revising the SCAT2: Introducing the SCAT3. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(5), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatta, T., Yoshizaki, K., Ito, Y., Mase, M., & Kabasawa, H. (2012). Reliability and validity of the digit cancellation TEST, a brief screen of attention. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychological Sciences, 55(4), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2012.246
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, E., Zhang, J., Brenkel, M., Shulman, K., & Feinstein, A. (2017). Getting clocked: Screening for TBI-related cognitive impairment with the clock drawing test. Brain Injury, 31(11), 1501–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1376763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headway. (2017). ABI 2016-2017 Statistics based on UK admissions. Retrieved May 2, 2022, from https://www.headway.org.uk/about-brain-injury/further-information/statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, S., Schubert, S., Hoon, C., Mioshi, E., & Hodges, J. R. (2013). Validation of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 36, 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1159/000351671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, S. L., Theadom, A., Ellenbogen, R. G., Bannick, M. S., Montjoy-Venning, W., Lucchesi, L. R., Abbasi, N., Abdulkader, R., Abraha, H. N., Adsuar, J. C., Afarideh, M., Agrawal, S., Ahmadi, A., Ahmed, M. B., Aichour, A. N., Aichour, I., Aichour, M. T. E., Akinyemi, R. O., Akseer, N., … Murray, C. J. L. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 18(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30415-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, A.-L. C., Peterson, H. A., Garcia, K. M., McNally, S. M., Mburu, T. K., Lippa, S. M., Dsurney, J., & Chan, L. (2019). Rey’s tangled line test: A measure of processing speed in TBI. Rehabilitation Psychology, 64(4), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosgallana, A., Cordato, D., Chan, D. K. Y., & Yong, J. (2019). Use of cognitive screening tools to detect cognitive impairment after an ischaemic stroke: A systematic review. SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 1(4), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-018-0035-2
   Google Scholar
• Luoto, T. M., Silverberg, N. D., Kataja, A., Brander, A., Tenovuo, O., Ohman, J., & Iverson, G. L. (2014). Sport concussion assessment tool 2 in a civilian trauma sample with mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 31(8), 728–738. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2013.3174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruff, P., Thomas, E., Cysique, L., Brew, B., Collie, A., Snyder, P., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2009). Validity of the CogState brief battery: Relationship to standardized tests and sensitivity to cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and AIDS dementia complex. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., Boers, M., van der Vleuten, C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M.,  & Terwee, C. B. (2021). COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability and measurement error of outcome measurement instrument. User Manual Version, 1. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/user-manual-COSMIN-Risk-of-Bias-tool_v4_JAN_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A.C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., De Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User manual. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nabors, N. A., Millis, S. R., & Rosenthal, M. (1997). Use of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (cognistat) in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12(3), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-199706000-00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NICE. (2014). Head injury: Assessment and early management. Retrieved May 5, 2022, from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg176/chapter/introduction
   Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. E., & Gardner, R. C. (2018). Traumatic brain injury in older adults: Do we need a different approach? Concussion, 3(3), CNC56. https://doi.org/10.2217/cnc-2018-0001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinasco, C., Oviedo, M., Goldfeder, M., Bruno, D., Lischinsky, A., Torralva, T., & Roca, M. (2023). Sensitivity and specificity of the INECO frontal screening (IFS) in the detection of patients with traumatic brain injury presenting executive deficits. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 30(3), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1937170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, D. C., & Bennett, T. L. (1995). Single versus composite score discriminative validity with the Halstead–Reitan battery and the Stroop test in mild brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/10.2.101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Aquired Brain Injury Network. (2017). Assessment of cognition – brain injury e-learning resource. Retrieved December 13, 2020, from https://www.acquiredbraininjury-education.scot.nhs.uk/impact-of-abi/cognitive-problems/assessment-of-cognition/
   Google Scholar
• Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverberg, N. D., Luoto, T. M., Öhman, J., & Iverson, G. L. (2014). Assessment of mild traumatic brain injury with the King-Devick test in an emergency department sample. Brain Injury, 28(12), 1590–1593. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2014.943287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, A., Rapoport, M. J., Leach, L., Phillips, A., Shammi, P., & Feinstein, A. (2006). The utility of the mini-mental status exam in older adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 20(13-14), 1377–1382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050601111385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolwyk, R. J., O’Neill Megan, H., McKay Adam, J. D., & Wong Dana, K. (2014). Are cognitive screening tools sensitive and specific enough for use after stroke? Stroke, 45(10), 3129–3134. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M. E. J., Safadjou, S., Farber, B., Velazco, N., Man, J., Reddy, S. H., Todor, R., & Teperman, S. (2015). Utility of the military acute concussion evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 79(1), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, M. R. J., Soh, Y. M., Plunkett, T. K., Ong, P. L., Huang, W., & Kong, K. H. (2019). The validity of the Montreal cognitive assessment for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury patients: A pilot study. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 98(11), 971–975. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teager, A., Methley, A., Dawson, B., & Wilson, H. (2020). The use of cognitive screens within major trauma centres in England: A survey of current practice. Trauma, 22(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460408619871801
   Google Scholar
• Vissoci, J. R. N., de Oliveira, L. P., Gafaar, T., Haglund, M. M., Mvungi, M., Mmbaga, B. T., & Staton, C. A. (2019). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the MMSE and MoCA questionnaires in Tanzanian swahili for a traumatic brain injury population. BMC Neurology, 19(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-019-1283-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron-Perrine, B., Gabel, N. M., Seagly, K., Kraal, A. Z., Pangilinan, P., Spencer, R. J., & Bieliauskas, L. (2019). Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a screening tool: Influence of performance and symptom validity. Neurology Clinical Practice, 9(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000604
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh, D. V., Capó-Aponte, J. E., Beltran, T., Cole, W. R., Ballard, A., & Dumayas, J. Y. (2016). Assessment of the King-Devick® (KD) test for screening acute mTBI/concussion in warfighters. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 370, 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting, P. F., Rutjes, A. W., Westwood, M. E., Mallett, S., Deeks, J. J., Reitsma, J. B., Leeflang, M. M., Sterne, J. A., Bossuyt, P. M., & QUADAS-2 Group. (2011). QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(8), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, L., Horton, L., Kunzmann, K., Sahakian, B. J., Newcombe, V. F., Stamatakis, E. A., von Steinbuechel, N., Cunitz, K., Covic, A., Maas, A., Van Praag, D., & Menon, D. (2021). Understanding the relationship between cognitive performance and function in daily life after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 92(4), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, G. K. C., Ngai, K., Lam, S. W., Wong, A., Mok, V., & Poon, W. S. (2013). Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for traumatic brain injury patients with intracranial haemorrhage. Brain Injury, 27(4), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.750746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., & Gao, X. (2023). A preliminary study of the saint louis university mental status examination (SLUMS) for the assessment of cognition in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury patients. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 30(4), 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1952414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Zhang, X.-N., Zhang, H.-L., Huang, L., Chi, Q.-Q., Zhang, X., & Yun, X.-P. (2016). Differences in cognitive profiles between traumatic brain injury and stroke: A comparison of the Montreal cognitive assessment and mini-mental state examination. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 19(5), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Wu, Y.-H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Preliminary study of the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination (SLUMS) in detecting cognitive impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 28(6), 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1680986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar