The real and subjective indoor environmental quality in schools

References

• Al-Hubail J, Al-Temeemi AS. 2015. Assessment of school building air quality in a desert climate. Build Environ. 94:569–579.10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson K, Stridh G, Fagerlund I, Larsson B. 1993. The MM-questionnaires: a tool when solving indoor climate problems. Örebro (SE): Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine; [accessed 2017 Nov 7]. http://www.mmquestionnaire.se/mmq/mmq.html.
   Google Scholar
• Becker R, Paciuk M. 2009. Thermal comfort in residential buildings – Failure to predict by Standard model. Build Environ. 44(5):948–960.10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary E, Asher M, Olawoyin R, Zhang K. 2017. Assessment of indoor air quality exposures and impacts on respiratory outcomes in River Rouge and Dearborn, Michigan. Chemosphere. 187:320–329.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins BL, Fisher W, Gillette G, Marans RW. 1990. Second-level post-occupancy evaluation analysis. J Illum Eng Soc. 19(2):21–44.10.1080/00994480.1990.10747961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decree of the Ministry of Health, Slovak Republic no 210/2016 Coll on detailed requirements for indoor environment of buildings and minimum requirements for low-standard flats and accommodation facilities.
   Google Scholar
• Decree of the Ministry of Health, Slovak Republic no 549-2007 on the permissible values of noise, infrasound and vibration and on requirement for the objectification of noise, infrasound and vibration in the environment.
   Google Scholar
• De Giuli V, Da Pos O, De Carli M. 2012. Indoor environmental quality and pupil perception in Italian primary schools. Build Environ. 56:335–345.10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 15251. 2007. Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics.
   Google Scholar
• EN ISO 7730. 2005. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbri K, Boeri A. 2014. IAQ evaluation in kindergarten: the Italian case of Asilo Diana. Adv Build Energ Res. 8(2):241–258.10.1080/17512549.2014.890532
   Google Scholar
• Forns J, Dadvand P, Esnaola M, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, López-Vicente M, Garcia-Esteban R, Cirach M, Basagaña X, Guxens M, Sunyer J. 2017. Longitudinal association between air pollution exposure at school and cognitive development in school children over a period of 3.5 years. Environ Res. 159:416–421.10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google Maps. [accessed 2017 Nov 7]. https://www.google.sk/maps/place/075+01+Trebi%C5 %5%A1ov/@48.6236433,21.7227196,16.5z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x47392ad76c0cb939:0x824576bb4e0d2268!8m2!3d48.6284913!4d21.715555?hl=en.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt T, Schiavon S, Piccioli A, Moon D, Steinfeld K. 2013. CBE Thermal Comfort Tool. Berkeley (CA): Center for the Built Environment, University of California, Berkeley; [accessed 2017 Nov 7]. http://cbe.berkeley.edu/comforttool/.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 10551. 1995. Ergonomics of the thermal environment – assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgement scales.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8996. 2004. Ergonomics of the thermal environment e determination of metabolic rate.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen S. 2007. Gender differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments. Build Environ. 42(4):1594–1603.10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, de Dear R, Cândido C, Zhang H, Arens E. 2013. Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Build Environ. 70:245–256.10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu LJS, Box M, Kalman D, Kaufman J, Koenig J, Larson T, Lumley T, Sheppard L, Wallace L. 2003. Exposure assessment of particulate matter for susceptible populations in Seattle. Environ Health Perspect. 111(7):909–918.10.1289/ehp.6011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loreti L, Barbaresi L, De Cesaris S, Garai M. 2015. Overall indoor quality of non-renewed secondary-school building. Energy Procedia. 78:3126–3131.10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.768
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Molina A, Boarin P, Tort-Ausina I, Vivancos J. 2017. Post-occupancy evaluation of a historic primary school in Spain: Comparing PMV, TSV and PD for teachers’ and pupils’ thermal comfort. Build Environ. 117:248–259.10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melikov A, Pitchurov G, Naydenov K, Langkilde G. 2005. Field study on occupant comfort and the office thermal environment in rooms with displacement ventilation. Indoor Air. 15(3):205–214.10.1111/ina.2005.15.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mølhave L. 1990. Volatile organic compounds, indoor air quality and health. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, 29 July–3 August; Toronto, Canada; p. 15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Morawska L, Ayoko GA, Bae GN, Buonanno G, Chao CYH, Clifford S, Fu SC, Hänninen O, He C, Isaxon C, et al. 2017. Airborne particles in indoor environment of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities: The main routes of exposure. Environ Int. 108:75–83.10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakano J, Tanabe S, Kimura K. 2002. Differences in perception of indoor environment between Japanese and non-Japanese workers. Energ Buildings. 34(6):615–621.10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00012-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbck D, Nordstrm K. 2008. An experimental study on effects of increased ventilation flow on students’ perception of indoor environment in computer classrooms. Indoor Air. 18(4):293–300.10.1111/ina.2008.18.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellerin N, Candas V. 2003. Combined effects of temperature and noise on human discomfort. Physiol Behav. 78(1):99–106.10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00956-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira LD, Raimondo D, Corgnati SP, da Silva MG. 2017. Assessment of indoor air quality and thermal comfort in Portuguese secondary classrooms: methodology and results. Build Environ. 81:69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley K, Ainsworth BE, Olds TS. 2008. Development of a compendium of energy expenditures for youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 5(1):45.10.1186/1479-5868-5-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Bracho L, Suh HH, Koutrakis P. 2000. Relationships among personal, indoor and outdoor fine and coarse particle concentrations for individuals with COPD. J Eposure Sci Environ Epidemiol. 10(3):294–306.10.1038/sj.jea.7500092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman Catholic Church in Trebisov. [accessed 2017 Nov 7]. http://trebisov.rimkat.sk/historiaklastor.php. Slovak.
   Google Scholar
• Simoni M, Annesi-Maesano I, Sigsgaard T, Norback D, Wieslander G, Nystad W, Canciani M, Sestini P, Viegi G. 2010. School air quality related to dry cough, rhinitis and nasal patency in children. Eur Respir J. 35(4):742–749.10.1183/09031936.00016309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedje G, Norback D, Edling C. 1997. Subjective indoor air quality in schools in relation to exposure. Indoor Air. 7(2):143–150.10.1111/ina.1997.7.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford TM. 2015. Indoor air quality and academic performance. J Environ Econ Manag Discipline. 70:34–50.10.1016/j.jeem.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teli D, Jentsch MF, James PAB. 2012. Naturally ventilated classrooms: An assessment of existing comfort models for predicting the thermal sensation and preference of primary school children. Energ Buildings. 53:166–182.10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The R Project for Statistical Computing. The R Foundation. [accessed 2017 Nov 7]. http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Trebisov City. [accessed 2017 Nov 7]. http://www.trebisov.sk/historia. Slovak.
   Google Scholar
• Vilcekova S, Meciarova L, Burdova E, Katunska J, Kosicanova D, Doroudiani S. 2017. Indoor environmental quality of classrooms and occupants’ comfort in a special education school in Slovak Republic. Build Environ. 120:29–40.10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Pettenkofer M. 1858. Über den Luftwechsel in Wohngebäuden. Der J.G. München: Cotta’schen Buchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Smedje G, Nordquist T, Norbäck D. 2015. Personal and demographic factors and change of subjective indoor air quality reported by school children in relation to exposure at Swedish schools: A 2-year longitudinal study. Sci Total Environ. 508:288–296.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamtraipat N, Khedari J, Hirunlabh J. 2005. Thermal comfort standards for air conditioned buildings in hot and humid Thailand considering additional factors of acclimatization and education level. Sol Energy. 78(4):504–517.10.1016/j.solener.2004.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Sohn J, Kim J, Son B, Park J. 2009. Indoor air quality investigation according to age of the school buildings in Korea. J Environ Manage. 90(1):348–354.10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wargocki P, Lian Z, Thyregod C. 2017. Effects of exposure to carbon dioxide and bioeffluents on perceived air quality, self-assessed acute health symptoms, and cognitive performance. Indoor Air. 27(1):47–64.10.1111/ina.2017.27.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZUS Trebisov. [accessed 2017 Nov 7]. http://zustrebisov.sk/. Slovak.
   Google Scholar