References
- Abraham A, Sommerhalder K, Abel T. 2010. Landscape and well-being: A scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments. Int J Public Health. 55:59–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s0038-009-0069-z.
- Bakolis I, Hammoud R, Smythe M, Gibbons J, Davidson N, Tognin S, Mecheli A. 2018. Urban Mind: using smartphone technologies to investigate the impact of nature on mental well-being in real time. BioScience. 68(2):134–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix149.
- Barton J, Pretty J. 2010. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ Sci Technol. 44(10):3947–3955. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/es903183r.
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 67:1–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.io1.
- Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S. 2008. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol Sci. 19(12):1207–1212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9820.2008.02225.x.
- Berto R. 2014. The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behav Sci (Basel). 4(4):394–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040394.
- Bolger N, Laurenceau J-P. 2013. Intensive longitudinal methods: an introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Knight TM, Pullin AS. 2010. A systematic review of the evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health. 10:456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456.
- Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, Eds. 2002. Body images: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Cash TF, Smolak L, Eds. 2011. Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and prevention. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Cash TF, Thériault J, Annis NM. 2004. Body image in an interpersonal context: adult attachment, fear of intimacy, and social anxiety. J Soc Clin Psychol. 23:89–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.1.89.26987.
- Colautti LA, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Skouteris H, McCabe M, Blackburn S, Wyett E. 2011. Accounting for fluctuations in body dissatisfaction. Body Image. 8:315–321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.07.001.
- Collado S, Staats H, Corraliza JA, Hartig T. 2017. Restorative environments and health. In: Navarro O, Fleury-Bahi G, Pol E, editors. Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research. Springer;p. 127–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_7.
- Enders CK, Tofighi D. 2007. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychol Methods. 12(2):121–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.
- Epskamp S, Waldorp LJ, Mõttus R, Borsboom D. 2018. The gaussian graphical model in cross-sectional and time-series data. Multivariate Behav Res. 53(4):453–480. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1454823.
- Fitzsimmons-Craft EE, Ciao AC, Accurso EC. 2016. A naturalistic examination of social comparisons and disordered eating thoughts, urges, and behaviors in college women. Intl J Eating Disord. 49(2):143–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22486.
- Frumkin H, Bratman GN, Breslow SJ, Cochran B, Kahn Jr. PH, Lawler JJ, Levin PS, Tandon PS, Varanasi U, Wolf KL, et al. 2017. Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environ Health Perspect. 125(7):075001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1663.
- Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M. 2019. Body image states in everyday life: evidence from ecological momentary assessment methodology. Body Image. 31:245–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.02.010.
- Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Chhouk J, McCann L-A, Urbina G, Vuo H, Krug I, Ricciardelli L, Linardon J, Broadbent J, Heron K, et al. 2019. Appearance comparison and other appearance-related influences on body dissatisfaction in everyday life. Body Image. 28:101–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.002.
- Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Dias S, Krug I, Richardson B, Fassnacht D. 2018a. Motive- and appearance-based explanations for body (dis)satisfaction following exercise in daily life. Br J Health Psychol. 23(4):982–999. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12334.
- Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, McCabe M, Skouteris H, Richardson B, Nihil K, Watson B, Solomon D. 2015. Does body satisfaction influence self-esteem in adolescents’ daily lives? An experience sampling study. J Adolesc. 45:11–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.009.
- Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Richardson B, Lewis V, Smyth J, Krug I. 2018b. Do women with greater trait body dissatisfaction experience body dissatisfaction states differently? An experience sampling study. Body Image. 25:1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.01.004.
- Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Skouteris J, McCabe M. 2013. A re-examination of the benefits of exercise for body satisfaction: consideration of individual difference factors. J Sport Sci. 31(7):706–713. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.746723.
- Gidlow CJ, Jones MV, Hurst G, Masterson D, Clark-Carter D, Tarvainen MP, Smith G, Nieuwenhuijsen M. 2016. Where to put your best foot forward: psycho-physiological responses to walking in natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 45:22–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.003.
- Gifford R. 2014. Environmental psychology matters. Ann Rev Psychol. 65:541–580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048.
- Griffiths S, Stefanovski A. 2019. Thinspiration and fitspiration in everyday life: an experience sampling study. Body Image. 30:135–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.07.002.
- Hartig T. 2005. Teorier om restorativa miljöer – förr, nu och i framtiden. [Theories of restorative environments – past, present, and future]. In: Johansson M, Küller M, editors. Lund, Sweden: Svensk miljöpsykologi. Studentlitteratur; p. 263–279.
- Hartig T, Böök A, Garvill J, Olsson T, Gärling T. 1996. Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scand J Psychol. 37(4):378–393. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1996.tb00670.x.
- Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries S, Frumkin H. 2014. Nature and health. Annu Rev Public Health. 35:207–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443.
- Heinberg LJ, Thompson JK. 1995. Body image and televised images of thinness and attractiveness: A controlled laboratory investigation. J Soc Clin Psychol. 14(4):325–338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1995.14.4.325.
- Hennigan K. (2010). Therapeutic potential of time in nature: Implications for body image in women. Ecopsychology. 2:135–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0017 3
- Heron K, Smyth J. 2013. Is intensive measurement of body image reactive? A two-study evaluation using ecological momentary assessment suggests not. Body Image. 10:35–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyimage.2012.08.006.
- Holloway JA, Murray J, Okada R, Emmons AL. 2014. Ecopsychology and relationship competency: the empowerment of women graduate students through nature experiences. Women Ther. 37(1–2):141–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2014.850343.
- Homan KJ. 2016. Factor structure and psychometric properties of a state version of the Body Appreciation Scale-2. Body Image. 19:204–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.10.004
- Jepsen Transgrud LK, Borg M, Bratland-Sanda S, Klevan T. 2020. Embodying experiences with nature in everyday life recovery for persons with eating disorders. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(8):2784. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082784.
- Kamitsis I, Francis AJP. 2013. Spirituality mediates the relationship between engagement with nature and psychological wellbeing. J Environ Psychol. 36:136–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envp.2013.07.013.
- Kaplan R, Kaplan S. 1989. The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Kaplan S. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol. 15:169–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2.
- Kondo MC, Jacoby SF, South EC. 2018. Does spending time outdoors reduce stress? A review of real-time stress response to outdoor environments. Health Place. 51:136–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.03.001.
- Leahey TM, Crowther JH, Ciesla JA. 2011. An ecological momentary assessment of the effects of weight and shape social comparisons on women with eating pathology, high body dissatisfaction, and low body dissatisfaction. Behav Ther. 42(2):192–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.07.003.
- Lee J, Park B, Tsunetsugu Y, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. 2009. Restorative effects of viewing real forest landscapes, based on a comparison with urban landscapes. Scand J For Res. 24(3):227–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580902903341.
- Lüdecke D (2019). SJSTATS: Statistical functions for regression models (Version 0.17.6). doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1284472
- MacKerron G, Mourato S. 2013. Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environ. Change. 23(5):992–1000. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvha.2013.03.010.
- Mayer SF, Franz CM. 2004. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol. 24:503e515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
- Mehl MR, Conner TS, Eds. 2012. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Melnyk S, Cash TF, Janda L. 2004. Body image ups and downs: prediction of intra-individual level and variability of women’s daily body image experiences. Body Image. 1:225–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.03.003.
- Mills J, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Holmes M. 2014. State body dissatisfaction and social interactions: an experience sampling study. Psychol Women Q. 38(4):551–562. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314521139.
- Mills J, Ling M. 2018. Using EMA to assess the relationship between fat talk and women’s body image experiences (SAGE research method cases). Sage. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526447364.
- Mitten S, D’Amore C. 2018. The nature of body image: the relationship between women’s body image and physical activity in natural environments. In: Vakoch DA, Mickey S, editors. Women and nature? Beyond dualism in gender, body, and environment. London, UK: Routledge; p. 96–116.
- Nakagawa S, Johnson PCD, Schielzeth H. 2017. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J. R. Soc. Interface. 14(134):1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0213.
- Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol. 4:133–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x.
- Napa-Scollon C, Kim-Prieto C, Diener E. 2003. Experience sampling: promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. J Happiness Stud. 4:5–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023605205115.
- Nezlek J. 2010. Multilevel modeling and cross-cultural research. In: Matsumoto D, van de Vijver F, editors. Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; p. 299–345.
- Nezlek JB. 2012. Multilevel modeling analyses of diary-style data. In: Mehl MR, Conner TS, editors. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. Guilford; p. 357–383.
- R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
- Ridolfi DR, Myers TA, Crowther JH, Ciesla JA. 2011. Do appearance focused cognitive distortions moderate the relationship between social comparisons to peers and media images and body image disturbance? Sex Roles. 65:491–505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9961-0.
- Rintala A, Wampers M, Myin-Germeys I, Viechtbauer W. 2019. Response compliance and predictors thereof using the experience sampling method. Psychol Assess. 31(2):226–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000662.
- Rogers A, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Lewis V, Krug I, Richardson B. 2017. A person-by-situation account of why some people more frequently engage in upward appearance comparison behaviors in everyday life. Behav Ther. 48(1):19–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j/beth.2016.09.007.
- Rudiger JA, Cash TF, Roehrig M, Thompson JK. 2007. Day-to-day body-image states: prospective predictors of intra-individual level and variability. Body Image. 4:1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.11.004.
- Stevenson MP, Schilhab T, Bentsen P. 2018. Attention Restoration Theory II: A systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments. J Toxicol Environ Health. 21(4):227–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2018.1505571.
- Stice E, Shaw HE. 2002. Role of body dissatisfaction in the onset and maintenance of eating pathology: synthesis of research findings. J Psychosom Res. 53:985–993. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00488-9.
- Stieger S, Kuhlmann T. 2018. Validating psychometric questionnaires using experience-sampling data: the case of nightmare distress. Front Neurosci. 12:901. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00901.
- Stieger S, Lewetz D, Swami V (2020). Psychological well-being under conditions of lockdown: an experience sampling study in Austria during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv. doi: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gjhfp.
- Stieger S, Reips U-D. 2019. Well-being, smartphone sensors, and data from open-access databases: A mobile experience sampling study. Field Methods. 31:277–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X18824281.
- Swami V. 2020a. Body image benefits of allotment gardening. Ecopsychology. 12(1):19–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2019.0032.
- Swami V. 2020b. Impact of exposure to films of natural and built environments on body image in older adults. In: Columbus N editor. The natural environment: past, present, and future perspectives. Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
- Swami V, Barron D, Furnham A. 2018a. Exposure to natural environments, and photographs of natural environments, promotes more positive body image. Body Image. 24:82–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.12.006.
- Swami V, Barron D, Hari R, Grover S, Smith L, Furnham A. 2019a. The nature of positive body image: examining associations between nature exposure, self-compassion, functionality appreciation, and body appreciation. Ecopsychology. 11(4):243–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2019.0019.
- Swami V, Barron D, Todd J, Horne G, Furnham A. 2020a. Nature exposure and positive body image: (Re-)examining the mediating roles of connectedness to nature and trait mindfulness. Body Image. 34:201–208. In press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.06.004.
- Swami V, Barron D, Weis L, Furnham A. 2016a. Bodies in nature: associations between exposure to nature, connectedness to nature, and body image in U.S. adults. Body Image. 18:153–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.07.002.
- Swami V, Frederick DA, Aavik L, Alcalay J, Allik D, Anderson S, Andrianto S, Arora A, Brännström Å, Cunningham J, et al. 2010. The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: results of the international body project I. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 36:309–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209359702.
- Swami V, Mohd Khatib NA, Vidal-Mollón J, Vintila M, Barron D, Goian C, Mayoral O, Toh EKL, Tudorel O, Vazirani S, et al. 2020b. Visits to natural environments improve state body appreciation: evidence from Malaysia, Romania, and Spain. Ecopsychology. 12(1):24–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2019.0065.
- Swami V, Mohd.Khatib NA, Toh E, Zahari HS, Todd J, Barron D. 2019b. Factor structure and psychometric properties of a Bahasa Malaysia (Malay) translation of the body appreciation scale-2. Body Image. 28:66–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.12.006.
- Swami V, Pickering M, Barron D, Patel S. 2018b. The impact of exposure to films of natural and built environments on state body appreciation. Body Image. 26:70–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.06.002.
- Swami V, Tran US, Barron D, Afhami R, Aimé A, Almenara CA, Alp Dal N, Amaral ACS, Andrianto S, Anjum G, et al. 2020c. The breast size satisfaction survey: breast size dissatisfaction and its antecedents and outcomes in women from 40 countries. Body Image. 32:199–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.01.006.
- Swami V, von Nordheim L, Barron D. 2016b. Self-esteem mediates the relationship between connectedness to nature and body appreciation in women, but not in men. Body Image. 16:41–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.11.001.
- Swami V, Weis L, Barron D, Furnham A. 2018c. Positive body image is positively associated with hedonic (emotional) and eudaimonic (psychological and social) well-being in British adults. J Social Psychol. 158:541–552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1392278.
- Tan W, Holt N, Krug I, Ling M, Klettke B, Linardon J, Baxter K, Hemmings S, Howard D, Hughes E, et al. 2019. Trait body image flexibility as a predictor of body image states in everyday life of young Australian women. Body Image. 30:212–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.07.006.
- Tylka TL. 2018. Overview of the field of positive body image. In: Daniels EA, Gillen MM, Markey CH, editors. Body positive: understanding and improving body image in science and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; p. 6–33.
- Tylka TL, Piran N, Eds. 2019. Handbook of positive body image and embodiment: constructs, protective factors, and interventions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow NL. 2015. What is and what is not positive body image? Conceptual foundations and construct definition. Body Image. 14:118–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.04.001.
- Ulrich RS. 1981. Natural versus urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environ Behav. 13(5):523–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581135001.
- Ulrich RS. 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environments. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF, editors. Human behaviour and environment. New York, NY: Plenum; p. 85–125.
- van den Bosch M, Bird W, Eds. 2018. Oxford textbook of nature and public health: the role of nature in improving the health of a population. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Wardle J, Haase AM, Steptoe A. 2006. Body image and weight control in young adults: international comparisons in university students from 22 countries. Int J Obes. 30:644–651. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803050.
- Webb JB, Wood-Barcalow NL, Tylka TL. 2015. Assessing positive body image: contemporary approaches and future directions. Body Image. 14:130–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.03.010.
- White J, Halliwell E. 2010. Examination of a sociocultural model of excessive exercise among male and female adolescents. Body Image. 7:227–233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.02.002.
- White M, Pahl P, Ashbullby S, Herbert K, Depledge MH. 2013. Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. J Environ Psychol. 35:40–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.002.
- White MP, Pahl S, Wheeler BW, Depledge MH, Fleming LEF. 2017. Natural environments and subjective well-being: different types of nature exposure are associated with different aspects of wellbeing. Health Place. 45:77–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.008.
- Woertman L, van den Brink F. 2012. Body image and female sexual functioning and behavior: A review. J Sex Res. 49:184–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.658586.
- Wyles KJ, Pahl S, Thomas K, Thompson RC. 2016. Factors that can undermine the psychological benefits of coastal environments: exploring the effect of tidal state, presence, and type of litter. Environ Behav. 48(9):1095–1126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515592177.