Selection of appropriate on-site household sanitation options for rural communities of Zimbabwe – case of Mbire district, Zimbabwe

References

• Bakus GJ, Stillwell WG, Latter SM, Wallerstein MC. 1982. Decision making: with applications for environmental management. Environ Manage. 6(6):493–504. doi:10.1007/BF01868378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes R, Ashbolt N. 2010. Development of a planning framework for sustainable rural water supply and sanitation. Int Stud Manag Organ. 40(3):78–98.
   Google Scholar
• Belton V, Stewart T. 2010. Problem structuring and MCDA. In: Ehrgott M, Figueira R Greco S, editors. Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis. New York (NY): Springer; pp. 209–239.
   Google Scholar
• Brikké F, Bredero M. 2003. Linking technology choice with operation and maintenance in the context of community water supply and sanitation. A reference document for planners and project staff. Geneva: WHO/IRC Water and Sanitation Centre. pp. 10, 103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Cairncross S, Bartram J, Cumming O, Brocklehurst C. 2010. Hygiene, sanitation, and water: what needs to be done? PLoS Med. 7(11):e1000365. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitescua RI, Lixandru M. 2015. The influence of the social, political and economic impact on human resources, as a determinant factor of sustainable development. Procedia Econ Fin. 39:820–826. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30259-3.
   Google Scholar
• Cinelli M, Kadziński M, Gonzalez M, Słowiński R. 2020. How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy. Omega. 96:102261. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakouré MS, Traoré MB, Sossou SK, Maïga AH. 2017. Development of sanitation technologies in African context: how could we make it more sustainable? IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 60:012032. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/60/1/012032.
   Google Scholar
• Dodgson JS, Spackman M, Pearman AD, Phillips LD 2009. Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. London: Department for Communities and Local Government. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/12761/1/Multi-criteria_Analysis.pdf. [accessed 2021 November 1].
   Google Scholar
• [GoZ] Government of Zimbabwe. 2017. The Zimbabwe national sanitation and hygiene policy draft. Jan 23, 2017 Version. National Act Committee Rural Water Supply Sanit. Harare: Government of Zimbabwe. pp. 1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Habenicht W, Scheubrein B, Scheubrein R. 2009. Multiple-criteria decision making. In: Derigs U, editor. Optimisation and operation research. (Vol. IV). Oxford: UNESCO-EOLSS Publishers Co. Ltd; pp. 257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Kalbermatten JM, Julius DS, Gunnerson CG, Mara DD. 1980. Appropriate sanitation alternatives - a planning and design manual. World Bank Studies in water supply and sanitationVol. 2. Washington DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World BAnk 204 pages
   Google Scholar
• Kanda A, Ncube EJ, Voyi K. 2021a. Adapting sanitation needs to a latrine design (and its upgradable models): a mixed method study under lower middle-income rural settings. Sustainability. 13(23):13444. doi:10.3390/su132313444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda A, Ncube EJ, Voyi K. 2021b. Effect of sanitation interventions on health outcomes: a systematic review of cluster-randomized controlled trials in rural communities of low- and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(16):8313. doi:10.3390/ijerph18168313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda A, Ncube EJ, Voyi K. 2021c. Frameworks for selecting appropriate rural sanitation technology options in low- and middle-income countries: a critical review. Int J Environ Health Res. 32(10):2324–2336. doi:10.1080/09603123.2021.1963685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda A, Ncube EJ, Voyi K, Parker A. 2022. Drivers and barriers to sustained use of Blair ventilated improved pit latrine after nearly four decades in rural Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE. 17(4):e0265077. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I. 2005. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manage. 1(2):95–108. doi:10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-J, Park J. 2019. A sustainable development strategy for the Uzbekistan textile industry: the results of a SWOT-AHP analysis. Sustainability. 11:4613. doi:10.3390/su11174613.
   Google Scholar
• Kumwenda S, Msefula C, Kadewa W, Ngwira B, Morse T. 2017. Estimating the health risk associated with the use of ecological sanitation toilets in Malawi. J Environ Public Health. 2017:1–13. doi:10.1155/2017/3931802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarnström E, Bracken P, Ysunza A, Kärrman E, Finnson A, Saywell D 2004. Sustainability criteria in sanitation planning. In: Godfrey S, editor. 30th WEDC International Conference, People-centred approaches to water and environmental sanitation; 25 – 29 Oct; Vientiane, Lao PDR. Louborough (UK): WEDC. p. 104–107.
   Google Scholar
• Ma W, Du Y, Liu X, Shen Y. 2022. Literature review: multi-criteria decision-making method application for sustainable deep-sea mining transport plans. Ecol Indic. 140:109049. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh K, IJzerman M, Thokala P, Baltussen R, Boysen M, Kaló Z, Lönngren T, Mussen F, Peacock S, Watkins J, et al. 2016. Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—Emerging good practices: report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force. Value Health. 19(2):125–137. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkhize N, Taylor M, Udert KM, Gounden TG, Buckley CA. 2017. Urine diversion dry toilets in eThekwini municipality, South Africa: acceptance, use and maintenance through users’ eyes. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 7(1):111–120. doi:10.2166/washdev.2017.079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neméth B, Molnár A, Bozóki S, Wijaya K, Inotai A, Campbell JD, Kaló Z. 2019. Comparison of weighting methods used in multicriteria decision analysis frameworks in healthcare with focus on low- and middle-income countries. J Comp Eff Res. 8(4):195–204. doi:10.2217/cer-2018-0102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi ME, Harrison SR, Wegener MK. 1999. Validation of multicriteria analysis models. Agric Syst. 62(2):105–116. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00059-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simiyu S. 2017. Preference for and characteristics of an appropriate sanitation technology for the slums of Kisumu, Kenya. Int J Urban Sustain Dev. 9(3):300–312. doi:10.1080/19463138.2017.1325366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sischka PE, Décieux JP, Mergener A, Neufang KM, Schmidt AF. 2022. The impact of forced answering and reactance on answering behaviour in online surveys. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 40(2):405–425. doi:10.1177/0894439320907067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spuhler D, Germann V, Kassa K, Ketema AA, Sherpa AM, Sherpa MG, Maurer M, Lüthi C, Langergraber G. 2020. Developing sanitation planning options: a tool for systematic consideration of novel technologies and systems. J Environ Manage. 271:111004. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spuhler D, Lüthi C. 2020. Review of frameworks and tools for urban strategic sanitation planning: a structured decision-making perspective. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 10(4):768–785. doi:10.2166/washdev.2020.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thokala P, Devlin N, Marsh K, Baltussen R, Boysen M, Kalo Z, Longrenn T, Mussen F, Peacock S, Watkins J, et al. 2016. Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—An introduction: report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force. Value Health. 19(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilley E, Ulrich L, Lüthi C, Reymond PH, Zurbrügg C. 2014. Compendium of sanitation systems and technologies. 2 nd revised ed. Dübendorf: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag).
   Google Scholar
• Troeger C, Blacker BF, Khalil IA, Rao PC, Cao S, Zimsen SRM, Albertson SB, Stanaway JD, Deshpande A, Abebe Z, et al. 2018. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis. 18(11):1211–1228. S1473309918303621. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30362-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turrén-Cruz T, García-Rodríguez JA, Peimbert-García RE, Zavala MÁL. 2020. An approach incorporating user preferences in the design of sanitation systems and its application in the rural communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Sustainability. 12(3):1024. doi:10.3390/su12031024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [WHO/UNICEF] World Health Organisation/United Nations Children’s Fund. 2020. State of the world’s sanitation. A call to transform sanitation for better health, environments, economies and societies. Geneva: WHO/UNICEF. [accessed 2021 November 1]. https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-sanitation-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Workman CL, Cairns MR, de Los Reyes FL, Verbyla ME. 2021. Global water, sanitation, and hygiene approaches: anthropological contributions and future directions for engineering. Environ Eng Sci. 38(5):402–417. doi:10.1089/ees.2020.0321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar