Prediction of creep crack initiation in Cr–Mo–V steel specimens with different geometries

References

• Webster GA, Ainsworth RA. High temperature component life assessment. London: Chpman & Hall; 1994.10.1007/978-94-017-1771-7
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E1457-15. Standard test method for measurement of creep crack growth rates in metals. ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tan M, Celard NJC, Nikbin KM, et al. Comparison of creep crack initiation and growth in four steels tested in HIDA. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2001;78:737–747.10.1016/S0308-0161(01)00085-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan B, Ceyhan U, Nikbin K, et al. European code of practice for creep crack initiation and growth testing of industrially relevant specimens. J ASTM Int. 2006;3:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Jing H, Xu L, et al. Evaluation of constraint effects on creep crack growth by experimental investigation and numerical simulation. Eng Fract Mech. 2012;96:251–266.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JP, Tu ST, Wang GZ, et al. Effect and mechanism of out-of-plane constraint on creep crack growth behavior of a Cr–Mo–V steel. Eng Fract Mech. 2013;99:324–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JP, Wang GZ, Xuan FZ, et al. Experimental investigation of in-plane constraint and out-of-plane constraint effects on creep crack growth. In ASME 2012 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Toronto, Canada; 2012. p. 271–275.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Jing H, Xiu J, et al. Experimental investigation of specimen size effect on creep crack growth behavior in P92 steel welded joint. Mater Des. 2014;57:736–743.10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto M, Miura N, Ogata T. Effect of constraint on creep crack propagation of mod. 9Cr-1Mo steel weld joint. In ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Prague, Czech Republic; 2009. p. 1533–1539.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinson AD, O’Dowd NP, Nikbin KM, et al. Experimental investigation of constraint effects on creep crack growth. In ASME 2002 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Vancouver, Canada; 2002. p. 143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinson AD, Nikbin KM, O’Dowd NP, et al. The influence of constraint on the creep crack growth in 316H stainless steel. In 5th International Conference Structural Integrity Assessment, Cambridge, UK; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Xu L, Han Y, et al. Quantifying the constraint effect induced by specimen geometry on creep crack growth behavior in P92 steel. Int J Mech Sci. 2015;94–95:63–74.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies CM, Mueller F, Nikbin KM, et al. Analysis of creep crack initiation and growth in different geometries for 316H and carbon manganese steels. J ASTM Int. 2006;3:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Davies CM, Dean DW, Yatomi M, et al. The influence of test duration and geometry on the creep crack initiation and growth behaviour of 316H steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009;510–511:202–206.10.1016/j.msea.2008.04.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JW, Wang GZ, Xuan FZ, et al. In-plane and out-of-plane constraint effects on creep crack growth rate in Cr–Mo–V steel for wide range of C*. Mater High Temp. 2015;32:512–523.10.1179/1878641314Y.0000000039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmanparast A. Prediction of creep crack growth behaviour in 316H stainless steel for a range of specimen geometries. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2014;120–121:55–65.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JW, Wang GZ, Xuan FZ, et al. Prediction of creep crack growth behavior in Cr–Mo–V steel specimens with different constraints for a wide range of C∗. Eng Fract Mech. 2014;132:70–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim N-H, Oh C-S, Kim Y-J, et al. Creep failure simulations of 316H at 550 & #xB0;C: Part II – effects of specimen geometry and loading mode. Eng Fract Mech. 2013;105:169–181.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies CM, Wimpory RC, Dean DW, et al. Specimen geometry effects on creep crack initiation and growth in parent materials and weldments. In Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA; 2011. p. 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Quintero H, Mehmanparast A. Prediction of creep crack initiation behaviour in 316H stainless steel using stress dependent creep ductility. Int J Solids Struct. 2016;97–98:101–115. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iino Y. Creep plastic zone and crack initiation in double edge notched specimens of 304 stainless steel at 650 °C. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;483–484:502–505.10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies CM. Predicting creep crack initiation in austenitic and ferritic steels using the creep toughness parameter and time-dependent failure assessment diagram. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2009;32:820–836.10.1111/ffe.2009.32.issue-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies CM, O’Dowd NP, Dean DW, et al. Failure assessment diagram analysis of creep crack initiation in 316H stainless steel. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2003;80:541–551.10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00107-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenk A, Mueller F, Dean D, et al. Developments in the use of creep crack initiation for design and performance assessment. Mater High Temp. 2004;21:33–39.10.1179/mht.2004.005
   Google Scholar
• Ewald J, Sheng S, Klenk A, et al. Engineering guide to assessment of creep crack initiation on components by two-criteria-diagram. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2001;78:937–949.10.1016/S0308-0161(01)00109-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller F, Scholz A, Berger C. Comparison of different approaches for estimation of creep crack initiation. Eng Fail Anal. 2007;14:1574–1585.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JP. Creep life assessment of structures containing crack incorporating constraint effect [doctoral dissertation]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JW, Wang GZ, Xuan FZ, et al. The influence of stress-regime dependent creep model and ductility in the prediction of creep crack growth rate in Cr–Mo–V steel. Mater Des. 2015;65:644–651.10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmanparast A, Davies CM, Webster GA, et al. Creep crack growth rate predictions in 316H steel using stress dependent creep ductility. Mater High Temp. 2014;31:84–94.10.1179/0960340913Z.00000000011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen. ABAQUS user’s manual, version 6.10. (RI): ABAQUS Inc; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Yatomi M, Nikbin KM, O’Dowd NP. Creep crack growth prediction using a damage based approach. Int J Press Vessels Pip. 2003;80:573–583.10.1016/S0308-0161(03)00110-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JP, Wang GZ, Xuan FZ, et al. Creep crack growth in a Cr–Mo–V type steel: experimental observation and prediction. Acta Metall Sinica. 2011;24:81–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh C-S, Kim N-H, Kim Y-J, et al. Creep failure simulations of 316H at 550 °C: Part I – A method and validation. Eng Fract Mech. 2011;78:2966–2977.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocks ACF, Ashby MF. Intergranular fracture during power-law creep under multiaxial stresses. Met Sci. 1980;14:395–402.10.1179/030634580790441187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel EI, Choudhary BK, Palaparti DPR, et al. Creep deformation and rupture behaviour of P92 steel at 923 K. Procedia Eng. 2013;55:64–69.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.220
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Shibamoto H, Inoue K. Long-term creep rupture behavior of smoothed and notched bar specimens of low-carbon nitrogen-controlled 316 stainless steel (316FR) and their evaluation. Nucl Eng Des. 2008;238:310–321.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan JP, Wang GZ, Tu ST, et al. Load-independent creep constraint parameter and its application. Eng Fract Mech. 2014;116:41–57.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar