Inferentialist Philosophy of Language and the Historiography of Philosophy

Bibliography

• Baynes, Kenneth. ‘Gadamerian Platitudes and Rational Interpretations’. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33, no. 1 (2007): 67–82. doi: 10.1177/0191453707071395
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert B. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994, in-text ‘MIE’.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert B. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert B. ‘Vocabularies of Pragmatism: Synthesizing Naturalism and Historicism’. In Rorty and His Critics, edited by Robert B. Brandom, 156–82. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert B. Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002, in-text: Tales.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert B. ‘Responses to Pippin, Macbeth, and Haugeland’. European Journal of Philosophy 13, no. 3 (2005): 429–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2005.00238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert B. Reason in Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009, in-text: ‘RP’.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert B. Perspectives on Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Collingwood, Robin George. An Autobiography. Oxford: Clarendon, 1939.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Kuno. Kritik der kantischen Philosophie. Munich, 1883. Translated by W. S. Hough in Journal of Speculative Philosophy 21, no. 1 (1884): 1–18. New York: Appleton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gracia, Jorge. Philosophy and Its History: Issues in Philosophical Historiography. Albany: SUNY Albany, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Houlgate, Stephen. ‘Phenomenology and De Re Interpretation: A Critique of Brandom's Reading of Hegel’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17, no. 1 (2009): 29–47. doi: 10.1080/09672550802610958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, Michael. ‘Representation or Inference: Must We Choose? Should We?’. In Reading Brandom, edited by Bernhard Weiss and Jeremy Wanderer, 227–46. New York: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer, Michael. ‘What Is the Good of Philosophical History?’. In The Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy, edited by Erich H. Reck, 227–46. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeth, Danielle. ‘Inferentialism and Holistic Role Abstraction in the Telling of Tales’. European Journal of Philosophy 13, no. 3 (2005): 409–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2005.00236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, David. ‘The Implications of Robert Brandom's Inferentialism for Intellectual History’. History and Theory 52, no. 1 (2013): 1–31. doi: 10.1111/hith.10651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, John. ‘Comment on Robert Brandom's Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel's Idealism’. European Journal of Philosophy 7, no. 2 (2005): 190–3. doi: 10.1111/1468-0378.00080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, John. ‘Brandom on Observation’. In Reading Brandom, edited by Bernhard Weiss and Jeremy Wanderer, 129–44. New York: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nuzzo, Angelica. ‘Life and Death in the History of Philosophy’. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33, no. 1 (2007): 35–53. doi: 10.1177/0191453707071392
   Google Scholar
• Osler, Margaret J. ‘The History of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy: A Plea for Textual History in Context’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2002): 529–33. doi: 10.1353/hph.2002.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, Willard Van Orman. Word and Object. Cambridge: MIT, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Redding, Paul. Analytic Philosophy and the Return of Hegelian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. History and Truth. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. ‘Incorrigibility as the Mark of the Mental’. Journal of Philosophy 67 (1970): 399–420. doi: 10.2307/2024002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. ‘On the Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres’. In Philosophy in History, edited by Richard Rorty, Quentin Skinner, and Jerome B. Schneewind, 49–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, Richard. ‘The Pragmatist's Progress: Umberto Eco on Interpretation’. In Philosophy and Social Hope, 131–47. London: Penguin, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Schmalz, Tad. ‘JHP and the History of Philosophy Today’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50, no. 4 (2012): 477–81. doi: 10.1353/hph.2012.0077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Quentin. ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’. History and Theory 8, no. 1 (1969): 3–53. doi: 10.2307/2504188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, Richard A. ‘What Is the History of Philosophy and Why Is It Important?’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40, no. 4 (2002): 525–9. doi: 10.1353/hph.2002.0085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar