672
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The motivations for Walter Burley’s theory of the proposition

Pages 1057-1074 | Received 25 Aug 2015, Accepted 17 May 2016, Published online: 14 Jun 2016

Bibliography

  • Aristotle. Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione. Edited by Laurentius Minio-Paluello. Oxford Classical Texts. New York: Oxford University Press, 1949.
  • Biard, Joël. ‘Le Statut Des Enonces Dans Les Commentaires Du Peri Hermeneias de Gautier Burley’. In Aristotle’s Peri Hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages, edited by H. A. G. Braakhuis and C. H. Kneepkens, 103–18. Artistarium Supplementa 10. Groningen: Ingenium, 2003.
  • Boethius. Commentaries on Aristotle’s De interpretatione: Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum Peri hermeneias. Edited by Karl Meiser. 1877. Reprint. Greek & Roman Philosophy. New York: Garland, 1987.
  • Brito, Radulphus. Quaestiones Super Universalia Porphyrii. In Jan Pinborg, ‘Radulphus Brito on Universals’, Cahiers de l’Institut Du Moyen-Age Grec et Latin 35 (1980): 56–142.
  • Brower-Toland, Susan. ‘Ockham on Judgment, Concepts, and the Problem of Intentionality’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37, no. 1 (2007): 67–109. doi:10.1353/cjp.2007.0008.
  • Bulthuis, Nathaniel. ‘Properties in Walter Burley’s Later Metaphysics’. In A Companion to Responses to Ockham, edited by Christian Rode, 140–72. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
  • Burley, Walter. Super artem veterem Porphyrii et Aristotelis. Venice, 1497. Reprint. Frankfurt am Main: Minerva, 1967.
  • Burley, Walter. De puritate artis logicae. Tractatus longior, with a Revised Edition of the Tractatus brevior. Edited by Philotheus Boehner. Louvain: Franciscan Institute, 1955.
  • Burley, Walter. De suppositionibus. In Stephen Brown, ‘Walter Burleigh’s Treatise De suppositionibus and Its Influence on William of Ockham’. Franciscan Studies 32 (1972): 15–64.
  • Burley, Walter. In Physicam Aristotelis expositio et quaestiones. Venice, 1501. Reprint. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1972.
  • Burley, Walter. Commentarius in librum Perihermeneias. In Stephen Brown, ‘Walter Burley’s Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Perihermeneias’. Franciscan Studies 33 (1973): 45–134.
  • Burley, Walter. Quaestiones in librum Perihermeneias. In Stephen Brown, ‘Walter Burley’s Quaestiones in librum Perihermeneias’. Franciscan Studies 34 (1974): 200–95.
  • Burley, Walter. Quaestiones circa tertium De anima. In Questions on the De Anima of Aristotle by Magister Adam Burley and Dominus Walter Burley, edited by Edward A. Synan, 76–156. New York: Brill, 1997.
  • Burley, Walter. Quaestiones super librum Posteriorum. Edited by Mary Catherine Sommers. Toronto: Pontificial Institute of Medieval Studies, 2000.
  • Cesalli, Laurent. ‘Le réalisme propositionnel de Walter Burley’. Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 68 (2001): 155–221. doi:10.3917/ahdlm.068.0155.
  • Cesalli, Laurent. ‘Le signifié propositionnel selon Jean Duns Scot et Gauthier Burley’. In Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century, edited by Stephen Brown, 465–82. Leiden: Brill, 2009. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004175662.i-526.108.
  • Cesalli, Laurent. ‘Meaning and Truth’. In A Companion to Walter Burley: Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician, edited by Alessandro Conti, 87–134. Leiden: Brill, 2013. doi:10.1163/9789004244603_005.
  • Conti, Alessandro. ‘Walter Burley’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/burley/. Accessed March 11, 2011.
  • Karger, Elizabeth. ‘Mental Sentences According to Burley and to the Early Ockham’. Vivarium 34 (1996): 192–230. doi:10.1163/1568534962579541.
  • de Libera, Alain. La référence vide: théories de la proposition. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2002.
  • Meier-Oeser, Stephan. ‘Walter Burley’s Propositio in Re and the Systematization of the Ordo Significationis’. In Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century, edited by Stephen Brown, 483–506. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
  • Muller, Paola Anna Maria. ‘Utrum propositio mentalis componitur ex rebus vel ex conceptibus: un dibattito tra Ockham e Burleigh’. Veritas 42, no. 3 (1997): 659–69.
  • Nuchelmans, Gabriel. Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1973.
  • Ockham, William. Scriptum in librum primum sententiarum ordinatio. Distinctiones II-III. Edited by Stephen Brown. Opera Theologica II. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute, 1970.
  • Perler, Dominik. Der Propositionale Wahrheitsbegriff Im 14. Jahrhundert. New York: Walter De Gruyter, 1992.
  • Pinborg, Jan. ‘Walter Burleigh on the Meaning of Propositions’. Classica et Mediaevalia 28, nos 1–2 (1969): 394–404.
  • Pini, Giorgio. ‘Signification of Names in Duns Scotus and Some of His Contemporaries’. Vivarium 39 (2001): 20–51. doi:10.1163/15685340152882525.
  • Pini, Giorgio. ‘Scotus on Assertion and the Copula: A Comparison with Aquinas’. In Medieval Theories on Assertive and Non-Assertive Language. Acts of the 14th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics (Rome, June 11–15, 2002), edited by Alfonso Maierù, 307–31. Florence: L.S. Olschki, 2004.
  • Rode, Christian. ‘Satze und Dinge. Die propositio in rei bei Walter Burley und anderen’. Bochumer philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 10 (2005): 67–90. doi: 10.1075/bpjam.10.05rod
  • Spade, Paul Vincent. ‘Walter Burley on the Simple Supposition of Singular Terms’. Topoi 16 (1997): 7–13. doi: 10.1023/A:1005770201116
  • Stanley, Jason. ‘Context and Logical Form’. Linguistics and Philosophy 23, no. 4 (2000): 391–434. doi:10.2307/25001784.
  • Vittorini, Marta. ‘Life and Works’. In A Companion to Walter Burley: Late Medieval Logician and Metaphysician, edited by Alessandro Conti, 17–47. Leiden: Brill, 2013. doi:10.1163/9789004244603_003.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.