Two notions of intentional action? Solving a puzzle in Anscombe’s Intention

Bibliography

• Alvarez, Maria. Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, Maria. ‘Wittgenstein on Action and the Will’. In A Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by Hans-Johann Glock and John Hyman, 491–501. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, Maria, and John Hyman. ‘Philosophy of Action 1945–2015’. In The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1945–2015, edited by Kelly Becker and Iain Thomson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombe, G. E. M. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombe, G. E. M. Intention. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, Annette C. ‘Act and Intent’. Journal of Philosophy 67, no. 19 (1970): 648–58. doi: 10.2307/2024585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, Matthew, and Doug Lavin. ‘Goodness and Desire’. In Desire, Practical Reason and the Good: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Sergio Tenenbaum, 161–201. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Lucy. ‘An Epistemology for Practical Knowledge’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisholm, Roderick M. ‘Intention by G. E. M. Anscombe’. The Philosophical Review 68, no. 1 (1959): 110–15. doi: 10.2307/2182551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Philip. ‘The Action as Conclusion’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31, no. 4 (2001): 481–505. doi: 10.1080/00455091.2001.10717577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, Donald. ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’. In Essays on Actions and Events, edited by Donald Davidson, 2nd ed., 3–19. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001a.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Donald. ‘Agency’. In Essays on Actions and Events, edited by Donald Davidson, 43–61. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001b.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Donald. ‘Freedom to Act’. In Essays on Actions and Events, edited by Donald Davidson, 2nd ed., 63–81. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001c.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Donald. ‘Intending’. In Essays on Actions and Events, edited by Donald Davidson, 83–102. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001d.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Cora. The Realistic Spirit. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, Keith S. ‘Knowing What I Am Doing’. Journal of Philosophy 60, no. 14 (1963): 401–9. doi: 10.2307/2022825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, A. ‘The Arithmetic of Intention’. American Philosophical Quarterly 52, no. 2 (2015): 129–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, A., J. Hornsby, and F. Stoutland, eds. Essays on Anscombe’s Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, Thor. ‘Anscombe and Practical Knowledge of What Is Happening’. Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (2009): 41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, Thor. ‘Perception and Non-inferential Knowledge of Action’. Philosophical Explorations 14, no. 2 (2011): 153–67. doi: 10.1080/13869795.2011.569746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddock, Adrian. ‘The Knowledge That a Man Has of His Intentional Actions’. In Essays on Anscombe’s Intention, edited by Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby, and Frederick Stoutland, 147–69. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hampshire, Stuart. Thought and Action. London: Chatto and Windus, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, Carl. ‘Rational Action’. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 35 (1961): 5–23. doi: 10.2307/3129344
   Google Scholar
• Hornsby, Jennifer. ‘Intending, Knowing How, Infinitives’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46, no. 1 (2016): 1–17. doi: 10.1080/00455091.2015.1132544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, Rosalind. ‘Intention’. Logic, Cause and Action: Essays in Honour of Elizabeth Anscombe (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement) 46 (2000): 83–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, John. Action, Knowledge, and the Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, O. R. ‘Things Known Without Observation’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61 (1960): 129–50. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/61.1.129
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, Anthony. Action, Emotion, and Will. New York: Humanities Press, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, Rae. ‘Intention as Faith’. In Agency and Action, edited by John Hyman and Helen Steward, 243–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lavin, Douglas. ‘Action as a Form of Temporal Unity: On Anscombe’s Intention’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45, no. 5–6 (2015): 609–29. doi: 10.1080/00455091.2015.1125589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, John. ‘Anscombe on Bodily Self-knowledge’. In Essays on Anscombe’s Intention edited by Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby, and Frederick Stoutland, 128–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Melden, Abraham I. Free Action. London: Routledge, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, R. ‘Anscombe on Practical Knowledge’ In Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, edited by J. Hyman and H. Steward, 43–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Anselm. ‘Backwards-Looking Rationality and the Unity of Practical Reason’. In Essays on Anscombe’s Intention, edited by A. Ford, J. Hornsby, and F. Stoutland, 242–69. London: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Newstead, Anne. ‘Knowledge by Intention? On the Possibility of Agent’s Knowledge’. In Aspects of Knowing: Epistemological Essays, edited by Stephen Hetherington, 183–202. Perspectives on Cognitive Science. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Newstead, Anne. ‘Interpreting Anscombe’s Intention §§32FF’. Journal of Philosophical Research 34 (2009): 157–76. doi: 10.5840/jpr_2009_14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Lucy. ‘On Knowing One’s Own Actions’. In Agency and Self-Awareness, 358–82. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Sarah K. ‘How We Know What We’re Doing’. Philosophers’ Imprint 9, no. 11 (2009): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Peacocke, Christopher. ‘Awareness, Ownership and Knowledge’. In Agency and Self-Awareness, edited by Johannes Roessler and Naomi Eilan, 94–110. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, Hanna. ‘Knowledge of Action Without Observation’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104, no. 3 (2004): 203–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2004.00153.x
   Google Scholar
• Rödl, Sebastian. Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Roessler, Johannes. ‘The Epistemic Role of Intentions’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society CXIII, no. 1 (2013): 41–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2013.00344.x
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, Gilbert. The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin Books, [1949] 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenkler, John. ‘Perception and Practical Knowledge’. Philosophical Explorations 14, no. 2 (2011): 137–52. doi: 10.1080/13869795.2011.569749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenkler, John. ‘Understanding “Practical Knowledge”.’ Philosophers’ Imprint 15, no. 15 (2015): 2–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. ‘A Classification of Illocutionary Acts’. Language in Society 5, no. 1 (1976): 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500006837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setiya, Kieran. ‘Practical Knowledge’. Ethics 118, no. 3 (2008): 388–409. doi: 10.1086/528781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setiya, Kieran. ‘Practical Knowledge Revisited’. Ethics 120, no. 1 (2009): 128–37. doi: 10.1086/606000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoutland, Frederick. ‘Introduction: Anscombe’s Intention in Context’. In Essays on Anscombe’s Intention, edited by Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby, and Frederick Stoutland, 1–22. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. Individuals. Abingdon: Routledge, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Teichmann, Roger. The Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Teichmann, Roger. ‘Why “Why?”? Action, Reasons and Language’. Philosophical Investigations 38, no. 1–2 (2014): 115–32. doi: 10.1111/phin.12065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Michael. ‘Naive Action Theory’. In Life and Action edited by Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby, and Frederick Stoutland. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Michael. ‘Anscombe’s Intention and Practical Knowledge’. In Essays on Anscombe’s Intention, edited by Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby, and Frederick Stoutland, 198–210. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• van Miltenburg, N. ‘Practical Knowledge and Foreseen Side Effects’. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6, no. 1 (2011): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, David. Practical Reflection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, Rachael. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Anscombe’s Intention. Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees. Oxford: Blackwell, [1953] 2001.
   Google Scholar