On some footnotes to Catharine Trotter Cockburn’s Defence of the Essay Of Human Understanding

Bibliography

• Anon. Remarks Upon an Essay Concerning Humane Understanding: In a Letter Address’d to the Author. London: M. Wotton, 1697.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Second Remarks Upon an Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, in a Letter Address’d to the Author: Being a Vindication of the First Remarks Against the Answer of Mr. Locke at the End of His Reply to the Lord Bishop of Worcester. London: M. Wotton, 1697.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Third Remarks Upon an Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, in a Letter Address’d to the Author. London: M. Wotton, 1699.
   Google Scholar
• Bigold, Melanie. Women of Letters, Manuscript Circulation, and Print Afterlives in the Eighteenth Century, Elizabeth Rowe, Catharine Cockburn, and Elizabeth Carter. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, Martha Brandt. “Some Aspects of the Philosophical Work of Catharine Trotter Cockburn”. In Hypatia’s Daughters: Fifteen Hundred Years of Women Philosophers, edited by Linda Lopez McAlister, 139–64. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Broad, Jacqueline. Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, Vere. “Locke’s Theory of Ideas”. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, edited by Vere Chappell, 26–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Samuel. Sermons on the Following Subjects, viz. Of Faith in God. … Published from the Author’s Maunscript, by John Clarke. 10 vols. London: James and John Knapton, 1730–1.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Catharine Trotter. A Defence of the Essay of Human Understanding Written by Mr Lock. Wherein Its Principles with Reference to Morality, Reveal’d Religion, and the Immortality of the Soul, are Consider’d and Justify’d: In Answer to Some Remarks on that Essay. London: Printer for Will Turner at Lincolns-Inn Back-Gate, and John Nutt near Stationers-Hall, 1702.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Catharine Trotter. The Works of Mrs. Catharine Cockburn, Theological, Moral, Dramatical and Poetical. Edited by Thomas Birch. 2 vols. London: J. and P. Knapton, 1751.
   Google Scholar
• Colman, John. John Locke’s Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Darwall, Stephen. The British Moralists and the Internal ‘Ought’: 1640–1740. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, Jane. ‘Early English Empiricism and the Work of Catharine Trotter Cockburn’. Metaphilosophy 44 no. 4 (2013): 485–95. doi: 10.1111/meta.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flloyd, Thomas. Bibliotheca Biographica: A Synopsis of Universal Biography, Ancient and Modern. 3 vols. London: J. Hinton and others, 1760.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature. Reprinted from the Original Edition in Three Volumes and Edited, with an Analytical Index. Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Lewis White Beck. New York: Macmillan, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, Anne. Catharine Trotter: An Early Modern Writer in the Vanguard of Feminism. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, John. Essays on the Law of Nature. Edited by W. von Leyden. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, John. The Correspondence of John Locke. 8 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976–82.
   Google Scholar
• Macaulay, Catharine. A Treatise on the Immutability of Moral Truth. London: A. Hamilton, 1783.
   Google Scholar
• Nuovo, Victor. Christianity, Antiquity, and Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Schneewind, J. B. “Locke’s Moral Philosophy”. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, edited by Vere Chappell, 199–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, Patricia. ‘Reflection, Nature, and Moral Law: The Extent of Catharine Cockburn’s Lockeanism in Her Defence of Mr. Locke’s Essay’. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 22, no. 3 (2007): 133–51. doi: 10.2979/HYP.2007.22.3.133
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, Leslie. “Catherine Trotter”. In Dictionary of National Biography. London: Oxford University Press, 1959–1960.
   Google Scholar
• Sreedhar, Susanne, and Julie Walsh. ‘Locke, the Law of Nature, and Polygamy’. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2, no. 1 (2016): 91–110. doi: 10.1017/apa.2016.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund, Elizabeth. ‘Catharine Cockburn’s Moral Philosophy’. PhD diss., Monash University, Melbourne, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Emily. ‘Catharine Cockburn on Substantival Space’. History of Philosophy Quarterly 30, no. 3 (2013): 195–214.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Emily. “Creation, Divine Freedom, and Catharine Cockburn: An Intellectualist on Possible Worlds and Contingent Laws”. In Women and Liberty, 1600–1800, edited by Jacqueline Broad and Karen Detlefsen, 206–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Uehlein, Friedrich A. ‘Whichcote, Shaftesbury and Locke: Shaftesbury’s Critique of Locke’s Epistemology and Moral Philosophy’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25, no. 5 (2017): 1031–48. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2017.1336700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J. C., Hugh Craig, and John Burrows. ‘Authorship of Remarks Upon Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding’. Eighteenth-century Thought 6 (2016): 205–43.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, George, ed. Remarks on John Locke by Thomas Burnet with Locke’s Replies. Doncaster: Brynmill, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Catherine. “The Moral Epistemology of Locke’s Essay”. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke’s “Essay Concerning Human Understanding”, edited by Lex Newman, 381–405. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar