What is Kant good for? Making sense of the diversity in the reception of Kant's philosophical method

References

• Azouvi, F., and D. Bourel, eds. De Königsberg à Paris. La réception de Kant en France, 1788–1804. Paris: Vrin, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Beiser, F. German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Beiser, F. The Genesis of Neo-Kantianism, 1796–1880. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Besoli, S. ‘Fenomenologia’. In L’universo kantiano. Filosofia, scienza, sapere, edited by S. Besoli, C. La Rocca, and R. Martinelli, 571–646. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Besoli, S., C. La Rocca, and R. Martinelli, eds. L’universo kantiano. Filosofia, scienza, sapere. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, G., ed. A Companion to Kant. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, G., and M. Friedman. ‘Kantian Themes in Contemporary Philosophy’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume 72 (1998): 111–51. doi: 10.1111/1467-8349.00038
   Google Scholar
• Camera, F. ‘Ermeneutica’. In L’universo kantiano. Filosofia, scienza, sapere, edited by S. Besoli, C. La Rocca, and R. Martinelli, 529–70. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, D. ‘The Critique of Pure Reason and Continental Philosophy: Heidegger’s Interpretation of Transcendental Imagination’. In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by P. Guyer, 380–400. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M. Introduzione al neocriticismo. Roma; Bari: Laterza, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M. ‘Filosofia Analitica’. In L’universo kantiano. Filosofia, scienza, sapere, edited by S. Besoli, C. La Rocca, and R. Martinelli, 647–707. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Förster, E. Die 25 Jahre der Philosophie: Eine systematische Rekonstruktion. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. Dynamics of Reason. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S., and M. Grist, eds. The Transcendental Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gava, G. ‘Kant, Wolff, and the Method of Philosophy’. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 8 (2018a): 271–303.
   Google Scholar
• Gava, G. ‘Kant, the Third Antinomy and Transcendental Arguments’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, (2018b). doi:10.1111/papq.12267.
   Google Scholar
• Gava, G., ed. The Current Relevance of Kant’s Method in Philosophy, Special Issue, Synthese (forthcoming a).
   Google Scholar
• Gava, G. Kant’s Method in the Critique of Pure Reason, forthcoming b.
   Google Scholar
• Gava, G., and R. Stern, eds. Pragmatism, Kant and Transcendental Philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Giglioli, G. ‘Neokantismo’. In L’universo kantiano. Filosofia, scienza, sapere, edited by S. Besoli, C. La Rocca, and R. Martinelli, 709–44. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Gorner, P. ‘Phenomenological Interpretations of Kant in Husserl and Heidegger’. In A Companion to Kant, edited by G. Bird, 500–12. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, P., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, P. ‘The Scottish Reception of Kant’. In Scottish Philosophy in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, edited by G. Graham, 118–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, R. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Heidemann, D., and K. Engelhard, eds. Warum Kant heute? Systematische Bedeutung und Rezeption seiner Philosophie in der Gegenwart. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, M., and C. Krijnen, eds. Kant im Neukantianismus. Fortschritt oder Rückschritt? Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, D. Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism, edited by D. S. Pacini. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Horstmann, R.-P. ‘The Reception of the Critique of Pure Reason in German Idealism’. In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by P. Guyer, 329–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• La tradizione kantiana in Italia. 2 vols. Università di Messina. Messina: Edizioni GBM, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Murphey, M. ‘Kant’s Children: The Cambridge Pragmatists’. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 4 (1968): 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, J. ‘Conceptual Connections: Kant and the Twentieth-Century Analytic Tradition’. In A Companion to Kant, edited by G. Bird, 513–26. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Parrini, P., ed. Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Pollok, K. ‘The “Transcendental Method”: On the Reception of the Critique of Pure Reason in Neo-Kantianism’. In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by P. Guyer, 346–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, S., ed. The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Vallois, M. La Formation de l’influence kantienne en France. Paris: Alcan, 1929.
   Google Scholar
• Wellek, R. Immanuel Kant in England, 1793–1838. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1931.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, K. R. ‘Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy’. In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by P. Guyer, 401–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zambelloni, F. Le origini del kantismo in Italia. Milano: Marzorati, 1971.
   Google Scholar