The Socratic fallacy undone

Bibliography

• Benson, Hugh H. ‘Misunderstanding the “What-Is-F-Ness?” Question’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 72 (1990a): 125–42. doi: 10.1515/agph.1990.72.2.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, Hugh H. ‘The Priority of Definition and the Socratic Elenchus’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 8 (1990b): 19.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, Hugh H. ‘The Priority of Definition’. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates, edited by J. Bussanich and N. D. Smith, 136–55. London: Continuum, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, Hugh H. Socratic Wisdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Beversluis, John. ‘Does Socrates Commit the Socratic Fallacy?’ American Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1987): 211–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussanich, John, and Nicholas D. Smith, eds. The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. London: Continuum, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Callanan, John J. ‘Kant on the Acquisition of Geometrical Concepts’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (2014): 580–604. doi: 10.1080/00455091.2014.982746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, John M., ed. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Dancy, Russell M. Plato’s Introduction of Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Futter, Dylan Brian. ‘On Irony Interpretation: Socratic Method in Plato’s Euthyphro’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 no. 6 (2013a): 1030–51. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2013.853166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futter, Dylan. ‘Socrates’ Human Wisdom’. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 52 no. 1 (2013b): 61–79. doi: 10.1017/S0012217313000334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futter, Dylan B. ‘Socrates’ Search for Laches’ Knowledge of Courage’. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 56 no. 4 (2017): 1–24. doi: 10.1017/S0012217317000610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geach, Peter T. ‘Plato’s Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary’. The Monist 50 (1966): 369–82. doi: 10.5840/monist196650327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halper, Edward C. ‘The “Socrates” of Plato’s Early Dialogues’. In Form and Reason: Essays in Metaphysics, 13–33. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, Terence H. Plato’s Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, Terence H. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Jacob. A Commentary on Plato’s Meno. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Lesher, James H. ‘Socrates’ Disavowel of Knowledge’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 no. 2 (1987): 275–88. doi: 10.1353/hph.1987.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehamas, Alexander. ‘Socratic Intellectualism’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2 (1987): 275–316.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, William J. ‘Plato and the “Socratic Fallacy”’. Phronesis 43 (1998): 97–113. doi: 10.1163/15685289860511041
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Richard. Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, William D. Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, Walter T. On Manly Courage: A Study of Plato’s Laches. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sedley, David N. The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Vlastos, Gregory. ‘Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge’. Philosophical Quarterly 35, no. 138 (1985): 1–31. doi: 10.2307/2219545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlastos, Gregory. ‘The Socratic Elenchus: Method Is All’. In Socratic Studies, edited by M. F. Burnyeat, 109–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994a.
   Google Scholar
• Vlastos, Gregory. Socratic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994b.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfsdorf, David. ‘The Socratic Fallacy and the Epistemological Priority of Definitional Knowledge’. Apeiron 37 (2004): 35–67. doi: 10.1515/APEIRON.2004.37.1.35
   Google Scholar