Bibliography
- “Appendix”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 99, no. 5 (1955): 352–4.
- Axinn, Sidney. “Two Concepts of Optimism”. Philosophy of Science 21, no. 1 (1954): 16–24.
- Cartwright, Nancy. “How Do We Apply Science?”. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974 (1974): 713–9.
- Churchman, C. West. “Editorial: Philosophy of Science and Liberalism”. Philosophy of Science 16, no. 1 (1949): 1–2.
- Churchman, C. West. “Logical Reconstructionism”. Philosophy of Science 17, no. 2 (1950): 164–6.
- Dewulf, Fons. “The Place of Historiography in the Network of Logical Empiricism”. Intellectual History Review 30, no. 2 (2020): 321–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2019.1648056.
- Douglas, Heather E. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009.
- Edgar, Scott. “Logical Empiricism, Politics, and Professionalism”. Science & Education 18, no. 2 (2009): 177–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9102-x.
- Feigl, Herbert, and May Brodbeck, eds. Readings in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.
- Frank, Philipp G. “Summarizing Remarks”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 99, no. 5 (1955): 350–1.
- Frank, Philipp G. Philosophy of Science: The Link Between Science and Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1957.
- Giere, Ronald N. “The Structure, Growth and Application of Scientific Knowledge: Reflections on Relevance and the Future of Philosophy of Science”. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970 (1970): 539–51.
- Giere, Ronald N. “From Wissenschaftliche Philosophie to Philosophy of Science”. In Origins of Logical Empiricism, edited by Alan W. Richardson and Ronald N. Giere, 335–54. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
- Handy, Rollo. “Personality Factors and Intellectual Production”. Philosophy of Science 23, no. 4 (1956): 325–32.
- Howard, Don A. “Two Left Turns Make a Right: On the Curious Political Career of North American Philosophy of Science at Midcentury”. In Logical Empiricism in North America, edited by Alan W. Richardson and Gary Hardcastle, 25–93. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.
- Kaminsky, Jack. “Can ‘Essence’ Be a Scientific Term?”. Philosophy of Science 24, no. 2 (1957): 173–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/287531.
- Katzav, Joel, and Krist Vaesen. “On the Emergence of American Analytic Philosophy”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25, no. 4 (2017): 772–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2016.1261794.
- Kaye, Kenneth. “The IQ Controversy and the Philosophy of Education”. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974 (1974): 181–8.
- Malisoff, William. “Editorial: What Is Philosophy of Science?”. Philosophy of Science 1, no. 1 (1934): 1–4.
- Malisoff, William. “Editorial: Philosophy of Science After Ten Years”. Philosophy of Science 11, no. 1 (1944): 1–2.
- Malisoff, William. “A Science of the People, by the People and for the People”. Philosophy of Science 13, no. 2 (1946): 166–9.
- Margenau, Henry. “Present Status and Needs of the Philosophy of Science”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 99, no. 5 (1955): 334–7.
- Reichenbach, Hans. The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951.
- Reisch, George A. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
- Richardson, Alan W. “Science as Will and Representation: Carnap, Reichenbach, and the Sociology of Science”. Philosophy of Science 67 (2000): 151–62.
- Richardson, Alan W. “That Sort of Everyday Image of Logical Positivism: Thomas Kuhn and the Decline of Logical Empiricist Philosophy of Science”. In Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, edited by Alan W. Richardson and Thomas Uebel, 346–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
- Richardson, Alan W. “Scientific Philosophy as a Topic for History of Science”. Isis 99, no. 1 (2008): 88–96.
- Richardson, Alan W. “Occasions for an Empirical History of Philosophy of Science: American Philosophers of Science at Work in the 1950s and 1960s”. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2, no. 1 (2012): 1–20.
- Riepe, Dale. “Flexible Scientific Naturalism and Dialectical Fundamentalism”. Philosophy of Science 25, no. 4 (1958): 241–8.
- Salmon, Wesley C. Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1989.
- Scriven, Michael. “The Exact Role of Value Judgments in Science”. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972 (1972): 219–47.
- Seeger, Raymond. “On the History and Philosophy of Science”. American Scientist 44, no. 2 (1956): 151–7.
- Shryock, Richard H. “The Nature of the Conference and Its Implications”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 99, no. 5 (1955): 327–31.
- Skolimowski, Henryk. “Technology Assessment as a Critique of a Civilization”. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974 (1974): 459–65.
- Tuboly, Adam. “Philipp Frank’s Decline and the Crisis of Logical Empiricism”. Studies in East European Thought 69, no. 3 (2017): 257–76.
- Uebel, Thomas. “Knowing Who Your Friends Are: Aspects of the Politics of Logical Empiricism”. Science & Education 18, no. 2 (2009): 161–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9100-z.
- Vaesen, Krist, and Joel Katzav. “The National Science Foundation and Philosophy of Science’s Withdrawal from Social Concerns”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 78 (2019): 73–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.01.001.
- Wiener, Philip P. Readings in Philosophy of Science: Introduction to the Foundations and Cultural Aspects of the Sciences. New York: Scribner, 1953.