“It is quite conceivable that judgment is a very complicated phenomenon”: Dorothy Wrinch, nonsense and the multiple relation theory of judgement

Bibliography

• Black, Max. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s ‘Tractatus’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Bostock, David. Russell’s Logical Atomism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, Rosalind. Russell and Wittgenstein on the Nature of Judgement. London: Bloomsbury, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, John. The Unity of Linguistic Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Sean. “Propositional or Non-Propositional Attitudes?”. Philosophical Studies 168, no. 1 (2014): 179–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0126-6.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Sean. “Dorothy Wrinch on Judgment as Multiple Relation”. Paper presented at the Tilburg-Groningen Workshop Women in the History of Analytic Philosophy, Tilburg University, October 27, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Nicholas. “Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment”. Philosophical Studies 47, no. 2 (1985): 213–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Nicholas. “Wittgenstein’s Criticism of Russell’s Theory of Judgment”. Russell 5, no. 2 (1985/1986): 132–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v5i2.1657.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, Peter. “How Wittgenstein Defeated Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment”. Synthese 154, no. 1 (2007): 121–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-0195-y.
   Google Scholar
• Hodes, Harold. “Why Ramify?”. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 56, no. 2 (2015): 379–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2864352.
   Google Scholar
• Hossack, Keith. The Metaphysics of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jubien, Michael. “Propositions and the Objects of Thought”. Philosophical Studies 104, no. 1 (2001): 47–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48134-0_10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen, Anssi. “Russell on Negative Judgement”. Topoi 39 (2020): 727–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9581-1.
   Google Scholar
• Landini, Gregory. “A New Interpretation of Russell's Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgment”. History and Philosophy of Logic 12, no. 1 (1991): 37–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01445349108837176.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, Susanne. “A Logical Study of Verbs”. The Journal of Philosophy 24, no. 5 (1927): 120–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2015082.
   Google Scholar
• Lebens, Samuel. Bertrand Russell and the Nature of Propositions: A History and Defence of the Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment. London: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Linsky, Bernard. “Logic Since the First Edition”. Chap. 3 in The Evolution of Principia Mathematica: Bertrand Russell’s Manuscripts and Notes for the Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, Fraser. “The Russell-Wittgenstein Dispute: A New Perspective”. In Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology, edited by Mark Textor, 206–41. London: Pelgrave, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Moltmann, Friederike. “Propositional Attitudes Without Propositions”. Synthese 135, no. 1 (2003): 77–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022945009188.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, Ray. Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude 1872–1921. London: Free Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ostertag, Gary. “The Analytic Tradition in Philosophy”. Analysis 79, no. 3 (2019): 560–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anz044.
   Google Scholar
• Pap, Arthur. “Logical Nonsense”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9, no. 2 (1948): 269–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2103393.
   Google Scholar
• Pears, David. “The Relation Between Wittgenstein’s Picture Theory of Propositions and Russell’s Theories of Judgment”. The Philosophical Review 86, no. 2 (1977): 177–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2184005.
   Google Scholar
• Pincock, Christopher. “Russell’s Last (and Best) Multiple-Relation Theory of Judgement”. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 117, no. 465 (2008): 107–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzn005.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, Frank. “Facts and Propositions”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7, no. 1 (1927): 153–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/7.1.153.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. “On the Nature of Truth”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 7, no. 1 (1906–1907): 28–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/7.1.28.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. “On the Nature of Truth and Falsehood”. Chap. 7 in Philosophical Essays. London: Longmans, Green, 1910.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams & Norgate, 1912.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. Mysticism and Logic. And Other Essays. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1917.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. London: Routledge, 1918.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. “On Propositions: What They Are and How They Mean”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 2, no. 1 (1919): 1–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/2.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Bertrand. The Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript. London: Routledge, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, Mark. “How Can We Mean Something?”. In Bertrand Russell and the Origin of Analytic Philosophy, edited by Ray Monk and Anthony Palmer, 137–53. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Senechal, Marjorie. I Died for Beauty: Dorothy Wrinch and the Cultures of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerville, Stephen. “Wittgenstein to Russell (July 1913), ‘I am Very Sorry to Hear … My Objection Paralyzes You’”. In Language, Logic and Philosophy, Proceedings of the 4th International Wittgenstein Symposium, edited by Rudolf Haller and W. Grassl, 182–8. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Graham. “Re-Examining Russell’s Paralysis: Ramified Type-Theory and Wittgenstein’s Objection to Russell’s Theory of Judgment”. Russell 23, no. 1 (2003): 5–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v23i1.2036.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Graham. “Russell’s Repsychologising of the Proposition”. Synthese 151, no. 1 (2006): 99–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-2246-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, Graham. “Wittgenstein and Russell”. In A Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by Hans-Johann Glock and John Hyman, 92–109. Chichester: John Wiley, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, Guy. “Wittgenstein on Russell’s Theory of Judgment”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 7 (1973): 62–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100000278.
   Google Scholar
• Textor, Mark. “Unsaturatedness: Wittgenstein’s Challenge, Frege’s Answer”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109, no. 1 (2009): 61–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2009.00258.x.
   Google Scholar
• Textor, Mark. “Judgement, Perception, and Predication”. In Act-Based Conceptions of Propositional Content, edited by Friederike Moltmann and Mark Textor, 290–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Trueman, Robert. “The Prenective View of Propositional Content”. Synthese 195 (2018): 1799–825. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1309-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [PM] Whitehead, A. N., and Bertrand Russell. Principia Mathematica, vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1910.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Notebooks 1914–1916. Edited by G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• [TLP] Wittgenstein, Ludwig. In Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. 2nd ed. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Wrinch, Dorothy. “On the Nature of Judgment”. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 28, no. 111 (1919): 319–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XXVIII.3.319.
   Google Scholar
• Wrinch, Dorothy. “On the Nature of Memory”. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 29, no. 113 (1920): 46–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XXIX.1.46.
   Google Scholar
• Zalabardo, J. L. “Wittgenstein’s Nonsense Objection to Russell’s Theory of Judgment”. In Wittgenstein and Perception, edited by Michael Campbell and Michael O’Sullivan, 126–51. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar