Why Leibniz should have agreed with Berkeley about abstract ideas

Bibliography

• Atherton, Margaret. “Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism”. In Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley, edited by Ernest Sosa, 45–60. Boston, MA: D. Reidel, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Berkeley, George. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1982 [1710]. [PHK]
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, Martha Brandt. “Berkeley’s Objection to Abstract Ideas and Unconceived Objects”. In Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley, edited by Ernest Sosa, 61–81. Boston, MA: D. Reidel, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Broad, C. D. Leibniz: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Dancy, Jonathan. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, René. Oeuvres de Descartes. Edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. Paris: Vrin/C.N.R.S., 1964–76. Cited by volume and page number. [AT]
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, Katherine. “The Role of Visual Language in Berkeley’s Account of Generality”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83, no. 3 (2011): 525–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley on Abstraction”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24, no. 4 (1986): 483–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayling, A. C. Berkeley: The Central Arguments. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Jesseph, Douglas. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Jolley, Nicholas. The Light of the Soul: Theories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Jorati, Julia. Leibniz on Causation and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jorati, Julia. “Embodied Cognition Without Causal Interaction in Leibniz”. In Causation and Cognition in Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Dominik Perler and Sebastian Bender, 252–73. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kulstad, Mark. “Leibniz’s Conception of Expression”. Studia Leibnitiana 9, no. 1 (1977): 55–76.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, Rae. “Locke’s Relations and God’s Good Pleasure”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100, no. 1 (2000): 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Leduc, Christian. “The Epistemological Functions of Symbolization in Leibniz’s Universal Characteristic”. Foundations of Science 19 (2014): 53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leduc, Christian. “Imagination and Reason in Leibniz”. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Edited by C. I. Gerhardt. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1875–90. Cited by volume and page number. [GP]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. G. W. Leibniz: Opuscules et fragments inédits. Edited by Louis Couturat. Hildesheim: George Olms, 1903. [C]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Edited by Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften. Darmstadt: Akademie, 1923–. Cited by series, volume, and page number. [A]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Leibniz: Philosophical Writings. Edited and translated by Mary Morris and G. H. R. Parkinson. London: J. M. Dent, 1973. [MP]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Leibniz’s ‘New System’ and Associated Contemporary Texts. Edited and translated by R. S. Woolhouse and Richard Francks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. [WF]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. G. W. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays. Edited and translated by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1989. [AG]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters. Edited by Leroy Loemker. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1989. [L]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Discourse on Metaphysics”. Cited by section number. [DM]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. New Essays on Human Understanding. Cited by page number from A 6.6. [NE]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Monadology”. Cited by section number. [M]
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, and Antoine Arnauld. The Leibniz-Arnauld Correspondence. Edited and translated by Stephen Voss. New Haven, CT: Yale, 2001. [LA]
   Google Scholar
• Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975 [1689].
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, J. L. Problems from Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Malebranche, Nicolas. The Search After Truth. Edited by Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 [1674].
   Google Scholar
• Melamed, Yitzhak Y., and Martin Lin. “Principle of Sufficient Reason”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2020 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/sufficient-reason/.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, Walter. “Leibniz on Sensation and the Limits of Reason”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 33, no. 2 (2016): 135–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, George S. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, Kenneth L. “Leibniz on the Veridicality of Body Perceptions”. Philosophers’ Imprint 16, no. 5 (2016): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, Kenneth L. Language and the Structure of Berkeley’s World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Phemister, Pauline. “Are Mind-Body Relations Natural and Intelligible? Some Early Modern Perspectives”. In Causation and Modern Philosophy, edited by Keith Allen and Tom Stoneham, 87–103. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pitcher, George. Berkeley. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Puryear, Stephen. “Leibniz über Begriffe und ihr Verhältnis zu den Sinnen”. In Sehen und Begreifen: Wahrnehmungstheorien in der Frühen Neuzeit, edited by Dominik Perler and Markus Wild, 235–64. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Puryear, Stephen. “Monadic Interaction”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18, no. 5 (2010): 763–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puryear, Stephen. “Leibniz on the Metaphysics of Color”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86, no. 2 (2013): 319–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puryear, Stephen. “Evil as Privation and Leibniz's Rejection of Empty Space”. In vol. 3 of “Für Unser Glück oder das Glück Anderer”: Vortrage des X. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, edited by Wenchao Li, 481–9. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edinburgh: J. Bell, 1785.
   Google Scholar
• Rickless, Samuel C. Berkeley’s Argument for Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Robinet, André. “Leibniz: Lecture du ‘Treatise’ de Berkeley”. Les Études philosophiques 2 (1983): 217–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sepper, Dennis L. “Spinoza, Leibniz, and the Rationalist Reconceptions of Imagination”. In A Companion to Rationalism, edited by Alan Nelson, 322–42. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, Alison. “Changing the Cartesian Mind: Leibniz on Sensation, Representation and Consciousness”. Philosophical Review 110, no. 1 (2001): 31–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swoyer, Chris. “Leibnizian Expression”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33, no. 1 (1995): 65–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, Kenneth P. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar