On the ethics of naturalism: Sorley and Sidgwick on ethics and evolution

Bibliography

• Audi, R. The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, D. “British Idealism and Evolution”. In The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, edited by W. J. Mander, 306–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cobbe, F. Darwinism in Morals and Other Essays. London: Williams & Norgate, 1872.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. The Cosmos of Duty: Henry Sidgwick’s Methods of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray, 1871.
   Google Scholar
• Dimova-Cookson, M., and W. J. Mander. eds. T.H. Green: Ethics, Metaphysics and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, D. Taking Morality Seriously. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, A. C. ed. The Idealist Tradition from Berkeley to Blanshard. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, A. C. Idealism: A Critical Survey. London: Methuen, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. “Biological and Evolutionary Roots of the New Liberalism in England”. Political Theory 4 (1976): 471–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Green, T. H. Prolegomena to Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1883.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. New York: Penguin, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hurka, T. British Ethical Theorists from Sidgwick to Ewing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, J. ed. and Huxley T. H. Evolution and Ethics, London: The Pilot Press, 1947 (1893/1943).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. “Epilogue”. In The Alien in the Chapel: Ferenc Békássy / Poems and Letters, edited by George Gömöri, and Mari Gomori, 237–42. Bloxham: Skyscraper, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, R. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• King’s College Cambridge. Annual Report, Obit, W. R Sorley, 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, M. Moral Realism as a Moral Doctrine. Oxford: Wiley, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lazari-Radek, K., and P. Singer. The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick & Contemporary Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lillehammer, H. “‘An Assumption of Extreme Significance’: Moore, Ross and Spencer on Ethics and Evolution”. In Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensability, edited by U. Leibowitz and N. Sinclair, 103–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lillehammer, H. “Debunking Morality: Evolutionary Naturalism and Moral Error Theory”. Biology and Philosophy 18 (2003): 567–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillehammer, H. “Ethics, Evolution and the A Priori: Ross on Spencer and the French Sociologists”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics, edited by M. Ruse and R. Richards, 13–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lillehammer, H. “Methods of Ethics and the Descent of Man: Darwin and Sidgwick on Ethics and Evolution”. Biology and Philosophy 25 (2010): 361–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, E. T. Twentieth-Century Western Philosophy of Religion 1900–2000. Dordrecht: Springer, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, W. J. British Idealism: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, W. J. Idealist Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Martineau, J. M. Types of Ethical Theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1886.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams Tullberg, R. Women at Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, R. A Hundred Years of British Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, R. Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude. London: Vintage, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. E. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903.
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, J. H. “In Memoriam: William Ritchie Sorley”. Philosophy (London, England) 11 (1936): 120–1.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. On What Matters, Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. On What Matters, Vols. 1 & 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, F. “Evolution and Ethics”. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 1 (1876): 334–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rashdall, H. The Theory of Good and Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1907.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, D. G. “Origin and Validity”. Mind 13 (1888): 63–79. Reprinted in Ritchie, D. G. Darwin and Hegel, with other Philosophical Studies, London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co. 1893, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, D. G. Darwinism and Politics, with two Additional Essays on Human Evolution. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co, 1889.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. Being Realistic about Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schneewind, J. Sidgwick’s Ethics and Victorian Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, B. ed. Essays on Henry Sidgwick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, J. A Study of Ethical Principles. London: Blackwood & Charles Scribner, 1894.
   Google Scholar
• Sidgwick, H. Essays on Ethics and Method, Edited by Marcus G. Singer, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Sidgwick, H. The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. London: Macmillan, 1907 (1874).
   Google Scholar
• Skorupski, J. The Domain of Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sorley, W. R. “Henry Sidgwick”. International Journal of Ethics 11 (1901): 168–74.
   Google Scholar
• Sorley, W. R. “The Philosophical Attitude”. International Journal of Ethics 20 (1910): 152–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sorley, W. R. A History of English Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1920.
   Google Scholar
• Sorley, W. R. Moral Values and the Idea of God, The Gifford Lectures 1914/15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1918.
   Google Scholar
• Sorley, W. R. On the Ethics of Naturalism, Shaw Fellowship Lectures, University of Edinburgh, January 1884, Edinburgh & London: William Blackwood & Sons, 1885.
   Google Scholar
• Sorley, W. R. Recent Tendencies in Ethics. London: William Blackwood & Sons, 1904b.
   Google Scholar
• Sorley, W. R. The Ethics of Naturalism: A Criticism, Second Edition, Revised, Edinburgh and London: William Blackwood & Sons, 1904.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, G. F. “W. R. Sorley (1855–1935)”. Mind; A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 45 (1936): 123–5.
   Google Scholar
• Street, S. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value”. Philosophical Studies 127 (2006): 109–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, H. C. ed. Personal Idealism: Philosophical Essays by Eight Members of the University of Oxford. London: Macmillan, 1902.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, C. “D.G. Ritchie on Socialism, History and Locke”. Journal of Political Ideologies 17 (2012): 259–80.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, D. Utilitarianism and the New Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana, 1985.
   Google Scholar