1,169
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Kant and Rehberg on political theory and practice

Pages 566-588 | Received 14 Jun 2021, Accepted 14 Apr 2022, Published online: 19 May 2022

Bibliography

  • Beiser, Frederick. Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790–1800. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.
  • Berdahl, Robert M. The Politics of the Prussian Nobility: The Development of a Conservative Ideology, 1770–1848. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.
  • Brandt, Reinhard. “Das Problem der Erlaubnisgesetze im Spätwerk Kants”. In Immanuel Kant, Zum Ewigen Frieden, edited by Otfried Höffe, 69–86. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995.
  • Cavallar, Georg. “Kant’s Judgment on Fredericks Enlightened Absolutism”. History of Political Thought 14, no. 1 (1993): 103–32.
  • Di Giovanni, George. Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors: The Vocation of Humankind 1774–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • Epstein, Klaus. The Genesis of German Conservatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1966.
  • Fichte, J. G. Contribution to the Correction of the Public's Judgments on the French Revolution. Edited and translated by Jeffery Church and A. Marisa Schön. New York: SUNY Press, 2021.
  • Guyer, Paul. “The Form and Matter of the Categorical Imperative”. In Kant Und Die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Bd. I, edited by Ralph Schumacher, Rolf-Peter Horstmann, and Volker Gerhardt, 131–50. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001.
  • Henrich, Dieter. “Über den Sinn vernünftigen Handelns im Staat”. In Kant, Gentz, Rehberg: Über Theorie und Praxis, edited by D. Henrich, 7–36. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1967.
  • Hernández Marcos, Maximiliano. “Rights-Perfectionism, from Kant’s Grundlegung to Politics. Kantian Debates”. In Perfektionismus der Autonomie, edited by D. Moggach, N. Mooren, and M. Quante, 29–68. Leiden: Fink/Brill, 2019.
  • Hüning, Deiter. “Kants Rechtslehre und ihre Rezeption in den zeitgenössischen Rezensionen”. In Die Rezensionen zu Kants Metaphysischen Anfangsgründen der Rechtslehre. Die zeitgenössische Rezeption von Kants Rechtsphilosophie. IX, 364 S. [Kant-Studien Ergänzungshefte, Band 212], edited by Diethelm Klippel, Dieter Hüning, and Jens Eisfeld, 297–316. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2021.
  • Kant, Immanuel. Practical Philosophy. Translated and Edited by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • Kant, Immanuel. Correspondence. Translated and Edited by Arnulf Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • Klein, Joel Thiago. “On Serpents and Doves: The Systematic Relationship Between Prudence and Morality in Kant’s Political Philosophy”. Kant-Studien 112, no. 1 (2021): 78–104.
  • Kleingeld, Pauline. “The Principle of Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory: Its Rise and Fall”. In Kant on Persons and Agency, edited by Eric Watkins, 61–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  • Klemme, Heiner. “Einleitung”. In Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis, edited by Heiner Klemme, VII–XXIX. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1993.
  • Ludwig, Bernd. “Condemned to Peace. What Does Nature Guarantee in Kant’s Treatise on Perpetual Peace?”. In Kant's Perpetual Peace: New Interpretive Essays, edited by Luigi Caranti, 184–96. Rome: LUISS University Press, 2006.
  • Maliks, Reidar. “Echoes of Revolution: Hegel's Debt to the German Burkeans”. In Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel: Freedom, Right, and Revolution, edited by James A. Clarke and Gabriel Gottlieb, 213–228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
  • Maliks, Reidar. Kant’s Politics in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
  • Maliks, Reidar. “Kant and the Debate over Theory and Practice”. In Kant und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010, edited by Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin, and Stefano Bacin, 741–52. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
  • Oz-Salzberger, Fania. Translating the Enlightenment: Scottish Civic Discourse in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Oxford Historical Monographs. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
  • Rauscher, Frederick. “Introduction to the Naturrecht Feyerabend”. In Kant: Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy, edited by Frederick Rauscher and Kenneth R. Westphal, 75–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  • Rauscher, Frederick. “Introduction to the Drafts of the Theory and Practice Essay”. In Kant: Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy, edited by Frederick Rauscher and Kenneth R. Westphal, 189–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  • Rehberg, August Wilhelm. “On the Relationship Between Theory and Practice”. Translated by Michael Gregory. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29, no. 6 (2020): 1166–76.
  • Rehberg, August Wilhelm. Sämmtliche Schriften. 3 vols. Hannover: Hahn, 1828–1831.
  • Rehberg, August Wilhelm. “Review of Kritik der praktischen Vernunft”. Allgemeine Literatur Zeitung 188 (August 6, 1788): 345–62.
  • Rehberg, August Wilhelm. Untersuchungen über die französische Revolution. 2 vols. Hannover: Ritscher, 1793.
  • Rehberg, August Wilhelm. “Ueber das Verhältniβ der Theorie zur Praxis”. Berlinische Monatsschrift 23 (1794): 114–43.
  • Reill, Peter Hanns. The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1975.
  • Taylor, Robert S. “The Progress of Absolutism in Kant's Essay What is Enlightenment?”. In Kant's Political Theory: Interpretations and Applications, edited by Elisabeth Ellis, 135–149. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012.
  • Vogel, Ursula. Konservative Kritik an der bürgerlichen Revolution. August Wilhelm Rehberg. Darmstadt: Luchterhand, 1972.