Norman Kemp Smith on the experience of duration

Bibliography

• Adams, George P. “Reason and Experience”. University of California Publications in Philosophy 10 (1924): 143–69.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, George P. “Temporal Form and Existence”. University of California Publications in Philosophy 18 (1935): 203–25.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Samuel. Space, Time, and Deity. 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1920.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Samuel. Spinoza and Time. London: Unwin Brothers, 1921.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Samuel. “Lessons from Spinoza”. Chronicon Spinozanum 5 (1928): 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Samuel. “On Taking Time Seriously”. In Marking the Centenary of Samuel Alexander’s Space, Time and Deity, edited by A. R. J. Fisher, 23–39. London: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Samuel. “The Reality of the Past”. In Marking the Centenary of Samuel Alexander’s Space, Time and Deity, edited by A. R. J. Fisher, 41–58. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Holly. “The Hodgsonian Account of Temporal Experience”. In Routledge Handbook of Temporal Experience, edited by Ian Phillips, 69–81. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Holly, and Rick Grush. “A Brief History of Time-Consciousness: Historical Precursors to James and Husserl”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2009): 277–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuard, Philippe. “The Snapshot Conception of Temporal Experiences”. In Routledge Handbook of Temporal Experience, edited by Ian Phillips, 121–32. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Davie, G. E. “The Significance of the Philosophical Papers”. In The Credibility of Divine Existence. The Collected Papers of Norman Kemp Smith, edited by A. J. D. Porteous, R. D. MacLennan, and G. E. Davie, 61–91. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, A. R. J., ed. Marking the Centenary of Samuel Alexander’s Space, Time and Deity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, A. R. J. “Temporal Experience and the Present in George P. Adams’ Eternalism”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (2022). doi:10.1080/09608788.2022.2085658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischhut, Akiko. “Presentism and Temporal Experience”. In Routledge Handbook of Temporal Experience, edited by Ian Phillips, 249–61. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Shaun. The Inordinance of Time. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, Geoffrey. “‘The Twin-Brother of Space’: Spatial Analogy in the Emergence of Absolute Time”. Intellectual History Review 22 (2012): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, Geoffrey. “Time and Temporal Experience in the Seventeenth Century”. In Routledge Handbook of Temporal Experience, edited by Ian Phillips, 30–41. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Grush, Rick. “Time and Experience”. In Philosophie der Zeit: Neue analytische Ansätze, edited by Thomas Müller, 27–44. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, S. H. “Perception of Change and Duration – a Reply”. Mind 9 (1990): 240–3.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerl, Christoph. “Temporal Experience and the Philosophy of Perception”. In Routledge Handbook of Temporal Experience, edited by Ian Phillips, 171–83. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Translated by John B. Brough. Vol. 4 of Collected Works. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• James, William. Principles of Psychology. 2 vols. New York: Henry Holt, 1890.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Norman Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965. Cited by first (A) and/or second (B) editions pagination.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, Sean. “The Puzzle of Temporal Experience”. In Cognition and Neuroscience, edited by Andy Brook and Kathleen Akins, 208–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, Norman. Studies in the Cartesian Philosophy. New York: Macmillan, 1902.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, Norman. “‘The Naturalism of Hume’, I and II”. Mind 14 (1905): 149–73. Reprinted in The Credibility of Divine Existence: The Collected Papers of Norman Kemp Smith, edited by A. J. D. Porteous, R. D. MacLennan, and G. E. Davie, 95–138. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, Norman. A Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan, 1918.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, Norman. Prolegomena to an Idealist Theory of Knowledge. London: Macmillan, 1924.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, Norman. The Philosophy of David Hume: A Critical Study of Its Origins and Central Doctrines. London: Macmillan, 1941.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, Norman. New Studies in the Philosophy of Descartes. London: Macmillan, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp Smith, Norman. The Credibility of Divine Existence: The Collected Papers of Norman Kemp Smith. Edited by A. J. D. Porteous, R. D. MacLennan, and G. E. Davie. New York: Macmillan, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Le Poidevin, Robin. The Images of Time: An Essay on Temporal Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, John. Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, Louis. “What is Worth Preserving in the Kemp Smith Interpretation of Hume?”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009): 769–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, A. O. “Review of Prolegomena to an Idealist Theory of Knowledge”. Philosophical Review 25 (1925): 185–93.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, W. J. British Idealism: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nasim, Omar W. Bertrand Russell and the Edwardian Philosophers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, John. A Hundred Years of Philosophy. London: Gerald Duckworth, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Ian. “Perceiving the Passing of Time”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (2013): 225–52.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Ian, ed. Routledge Handbook of Temporal Experience. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, Simon. “Rethinking the Specious Present”. In Routledge Handbook of Temporal Experience, edited by Ian Phillips, 146–56. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of the Mind. London: Bell and Johnson, 1785.
   Google Scholar
• Ruja, Harry. “Samuel Alexander's Concept of Space-Time”. Philosophy of Science 2 (1935): 188–209.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, Roy Wood. “A Re-Examination of Critical Realism”. Philosophical Review 38 (1929): 439–55.
   Google Scholar
• Schaar, M. G. F. Stout and the Psychological Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sklar, Lawrence. Space, Time, and Spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, George F. “Perception of Change and Duration”. Mind 9 (1900): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, George F. “Primary and Secondary Qualities”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 4 (1904): 141–60.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, George F. Fundamental Points in the Theory of Knowledge. Glasgow: R. Maclehose, 1911.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, George F. Manual of Psychology. 3rd ed. London: University Tutorial Press, 1924.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Emily. “Space, Time, and Samuel Alexander”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2013): 549–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Emily. “Samuel Alexander’s Space-Time God: A Naturalist Rival to Current Emergentist Theologies”. In Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff and Yujin Nagasawa, 255–73. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, John. “Kemp Smith and the Two Kinds of Naturalism in Hume’s Philosophy”. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 62 (2007): 17–36.
   Google Scholar