Anne Conway on divine and creaturely freedom

Bibliography

• Borcherding, Julia. “Loving the Body, Loving the Soul: Conway’s Vitalist Critique of Cartesian and Morean Dualism”. In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. 9, edited by Donald Rutherford, 1–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Broad, Jacqueline. “Conway and Charleton on the Intimate Presence of Souls in Bodies”. Journal of the History of Ideas 79, no. 4 (2018): 571–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, Anne. Principia Philosophiae (The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy). Translated by ‘J.C.’ Medicinae Professor. London: Paternoster Row, 1692.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, Anne. The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess. Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends 1642-1684 (First Edition: 1930), edited by Marjorie Hope Nicolson and Sarah Hutton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, Anne. The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Edited and translated by Allison P. Coudert and Taylor Corse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Descartes, René. “Principles of Philosophy”. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1, edited and translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, 177–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson, Eric. The Notion of That Which Depends on Us in Plotinus and its Background. Boston: Brill, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Freddoso, Alfred J. “God’s General Concurrence with Secondary Causes: Why Conservation Is Not Enough”. Philosophical Perspectives 5 (1991): 553–85.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, John. “Conway’s Ontological Objection to Cartesian Dualism”. Philosopher’s. Imprint 17, no. 13 (2017): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, Jonathan. “Anne Conway on Time, the Trinity, and Eschatology”. Philosophy and Theology 29, no. 2 (2017): 277–95.
   Google Scholar
• Head, Jonathan. “Anne Conway and Henry More on Freedom”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27, no. 5 (2019): 631–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, Jonathan. The Philosophy of Anne Conway: God, Creation and the Nature of Time. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, Sarah. “Henry More and Anne Conway on Preexistence and Universal Salvation”. In In “Mind Senior to the World”: Stoicismo e Origenismo Nella Filosfia Platonica del Seicento Inglese, edited by Marialuisa Baldi, 113–26. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, Sarah. “Henry More’s Moral Philosophy: Self-Determination and its Limits”. Studies in the History of Philosophy 8, no. 3 (2017): 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, Sarah. “Goodness in Anne Conway’s Metaphysics”. In Early Modern Women on Metaphysics, edited by Emily Thomas, 229–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, Sarah. “Plato and the Platonism of Anne Conway”. In Women, Philosophy and Science, edited by Sabrina Ebbersmeyer, and Gianni Paganini, 41–51. Cham: Springer, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lascano, Marcy P. “Anne Conway: Bodies in the Spiritual World”. Philosophy Compass 8, no. 4 (2013): 327–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lascano, Marcy P. “Anne Conway on Liberty”. In Women and Liberty, 1600-1800: Philosophical Essays, edited by Jacqueline Broad, and Karen Detlefsen, 163–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, Thomas M. “Descartes and the Seven Senses of Indifference in Early Modern Philosophy”. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue Canadienne De Philosophie LA, California) 50, no. 3 (2011): 577–602. doi:10.1017/S0012217311000552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRobert, Jennifer. “Anne Conway’s Vitalism and Her Critique of Descartes.”. International Philosophical Quarterly 40, no. 1 (2000): 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, Christia. “Platonism in Early Modern Natural Philosophy: The Case of Leibniz. and Conway”. In Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature, edited by James Wilberding, and Christoph Horn, 103–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012a.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Christia. “Knowledge and Suffering in Early Modern Philosophy: G.W. Leibniz and Anne Conway”. In Emotional Minds, edited by Sabrina Ebbersmeyer, 179–206. Göttingen: De Gruyter, 2012b.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Christia. “Anne Conway’s Response to Cartesianism”. In The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, edited by Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz, and Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 707–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• More, Henry. “The Immortality of the Soul”. In Philosophical Writings of Henry More, edited by Flora Isabel MacKinnon, 57–182. New York: Oxford University Press, 1925.
   Google Scholar
• More, Henry. Enchiridion Ethicum. Translated by Edward Southwell, reprinted. New York: The Facsimile Text Society, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Parageau, Sandrine. “Christ in Anne Conway’s Principia (1690): Metaphysics, Syncretism, and Female Imitatio Christi”. Journal of Early Modern Christianity 5, no. 2 (2018): 247–65. doi:10.1515/jemc-2018-0005.
   Google Scholar
• Plotinus. Ennead VI.8: On the Voluntary and on the Free Will of the One. Translated by Kevin Corrigan and John Douglas with Introduction and Commentary. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Jasper. The Metaphysics of Henry More. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schneewind, J. B. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Emily. “Time, Space, and Process in Anne Conway”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25, no. 5 (2017): 990–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Helmont, Francis Mercury. Seder Olam. Translated by J. Clark. London: Sarah Howkins, 1694.
   Google Scholar
• Van Helmont, Francis Mercury with Paulus Buchius. The Divine Being and its Attributes. Translated by Philanglus. London: for the author, 1693.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Susan. “Asymmetrical Freedom”. The Journal of Philosophy 77, no. 3 (1980): 151–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar