On adaptive occupant-learning window blind and lighting controls

References

• ASHRAE (2010a). Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. ASHRAE Standard 55. Atlanta, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• ASHRAE (2010b). Standard 90.1. Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta, American Society for Heating Refrigeration and Air-conditioning.
   Google Scholar
• Bordass, B., & Cohen, R., Standeven, M., & Leaman, A. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 2: Technical performance of the Probe buildings. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 103–113. doi: 10.1080/09613210010008027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgeson, S., & Brager, G. (2008). Occupant control of windows: Accounting for human behavior in building simulation. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, P. (1980). Observations of the manual switching of lighting. Lighting Research and Technology, 12(4), 195–205. doi: 10.1177/096032718001200403
   Google Scholar
• Brager, G., Paliaga, G., & de Dear, R. (2004). Operable windows, personal control and occupant comfort. ASHRAE transactions, 110(2), 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, J. E., & Chaturvedi, N. (2002). An inverse gray-box model for transient building load prediction. HVAC&R Research, 8(1), 73–99. doi: 10.1080/10789669.2002.10391290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D., Slater, A., & Moore, T. (1999). A study of occupier controlled lighting systems. Proceedings of the 24th Session of the CIE. Warsaw, Poland, CIE. 133: 108–110.
   Google Scholar
• Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers Guide A (CIBSE, G. A.) (2006). Environmental design. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Claridge, D., & Abushakra, B. (2001). Accounting for the occupancy variable in inverse building energy baselining models. Proceedings of the International Conference for Enhanced Building Operations (ICEBO).
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. A., Cockroft, J., Conner, S., Hand, J. W., Kelly, N. J., Moore, R., …, Strachan, P. (2002). Simulation-assisted control in building energy management systems. Energy and Buildings, 34(9), 933–940. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00068-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J., & Brown, Z. (2009). Reconciling human and automated intelligence in the provision of occupant comfort. Intelligent Buildings International, 1(1), 39–55. doi: 10.3763/inbi.2009.0007
   Google Scholar
• Dodier, R. H., Henze, G. P., Tiller, D. K., & Guo, X. (2006). Building occupancy detection through sensor belief networks. Energy and Buildings, 38(9), 1033–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOE, U. (2010). Energyplus engineering reference. The Reference to EnergyPlus Calculations.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, B., Lam, K. P., & Neuman, C. (2011). Integrated building control based on occupant behavior pattern detection and local weather forecasting. Twelfth International IBPSA Conference. Sydney: IBPSA Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dounis, A. I., & Caraiscos, C. (2009). Advanced control systems engineering for energy and comfort management in a building environment – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(6), 1246–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiro, M. (2004). Occupancy Sensors: are there reliable estimates of the energy savings. Lighting Design+ Application (LD+ A).
   Google Scholar
• Fux, S. F., Ashouri, A., Benz, M. J., & Guzzella, L. (in press). EKF based self-adaptive thermal model for a passive house. Energy and Buildings, (0).
   Google Scholar
• Galasiu, A. D., Newsham, G. R., Suvagau, C., & Sander, D. M. (2007). Energy saving lighting control systems for open-plan offices: A field study. Leukos, 4(1), 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasiu, A. D., & Veitch, J. A. (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 728–742. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, M. S., & Andrews, A. P. (2011). Kalman filtering: theory and practice using MATLAB, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, A. (2003). Using genetic algorithms to take into account user wishes in an advanced building control system, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, A., & Molteni, S. (2002). An energy-efficient controller for shading devices self-adapting to the user wishes. Building and Environment, 37(11), 1091–1097. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00113-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunay, H. B., O'Brien, W., Beausoleil-Morrison, I., Goldstein, R., Breslav, S., & Khan, A. (2014). Coupling stochastic occupant models to building performance simulation using the discrete event system specification (DEVS) formalism. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 7, 457–478.
   Google Scholar
• Gunay, H. B., O'Brien, W., & Beausoleil-Morrison, I. (2013). A critical review of observation studies, modeling, and simulation of adaptive occupant behaviors in offices. Building and Environment, 70(0), 31–47. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X., Tiller, D., Henze, G., & Waters, C. (2010). The performance of occupancy-based lighting control systems: A review. Lighting Research and Technology, 42(4), 415–431. doi: 10.1177/1477153510376225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, F. (2010). Particle filter theory and practice with positioning applications. Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, IEEE, 25(7), 53–82. doi: 10.1109/MAES.2010.5546308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldi, F., & Robinson, D. (2010). Adaptive actions on shading devices in response to local visual stimuli. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 3(2), 135–153. doi: 10.1080/19401490903580759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldi, F., & Robinson, D. (2011). The impact of occupants’ behaviour on building energy demand. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4(4), 323–338. doi: 10.1080/19401493.2011.558213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerwagen, J., & Diamond, R. (1992). Adaptations and coping: occupant response to discomfort in energy efficient buildings. Proceedings of the 1992 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, D. R. G. (1979). The use of artificial lighting in relation to daylight levels and occupancy. Building and Environment, 14(1), 21–33. doi: 10.1016/0360-1323(79)90025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IES (2013). American national standard practice for office lighting. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society, 95.
   Google Scholar
• Inkarojrit, V., & Paliaga, G. (2004). Indoor climatic influences on the operation of windows in a naturally ventilated building. 21st PLEA Conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue, T., Kawase,T., Ibamoto, T., Takakusa, S., & Matsuo, Y. (1988). The development of an optimal control system for window shading devices based on investigations in office buildings. ASHRAE transactions, 94, 1034–1049.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. D., Rubinstein, F. M., DiBartolomeo, D., & Blanc, S. L. (2000). Comparison of control options in private offices in an advanced lighting controls testbed. Journal – Illuminating Engineering Society, 29(2), 39–60. doi: 10.1080/00994480.2000.10748316
   Google Scholar
• Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of basic Engineering, 82(1), 35–45. doi: 10.1115/1.3662552
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 4: The Probe occupant surveys and their implications. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 129–143. doi: 10.1080/09613210010008045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. S., Clear, R. D., Ward, G. J., & Fernandes, L. (2007). Commissioning and verification procedures for the automated roller shade system at The New York times headquarters, New York, New York. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. S., Selkowitz, S. E., Hughes, G. D., Clear, R. D., Ward, G., Mardaljevic, J., … Inkarojrit, V. (2005). Daylighting The New York Times headquarters building. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, final report LBNL-57602.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Carswell, C. M., Seidelman, W., & Sublette, M. (2013). Green expectations: The story of a customizable lighting control panel designed to reduce energy use. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, C., & Littlefair, P. (1992). Occupant use of venetian blinds in offices. Building Research Establishment (BRE), Contract PD233/92, Garston Library, Watford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Love, J. A. (1998). Manual switching patterns in private offices. Lighting Research and Technology, 30(1), 45–50. doi: 10.1177/096032719803000107
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavi, A., Mohammadi, A., Kabir, E., & Lambeva, L. (2008a). Occupants’ operation of lighting and shading systems in office buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1(1), 57–65. doi: 10.1080/19401490801906502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi, A., Mohammadi, A., Kabir, E., & Lambeva, L. (2008b). Shading and lighting operation in office buildings in Austria: A study of user control behavior. Building Simulation, 1(2), 111–117. doi: 10.1007/s12273-008-8104-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniccia, D., Rutledge, B., Rea, M. S., & Morrow, W. (1999). Occupant use of manual lighting controls in private offices. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 28(2), 42–56. doi: 10.1080/00994480.1999.10748274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardaljevic, J., Heschong, L., & Lee, E. (2009). Daylight metrics and energy savings. Lighting Research and Technology, 41(3), 261–283. doi: 10.1177/1477153509339703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. A., Federspiel, C. C., & Auslander, D. (2002). Responding to thermal sensation complaints in buildings. ASHRAE transactions, 108(1), 407–412.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., Carter, D. J., & Slater, A. I. (2002). A field study of occupant controlled lighting in offices. Lighting Research and Technology, 34(3), 191–202. doi: 10.1191/1365782802lt047oa
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., Carter, D. J., & Slater, Al (2003). Long-term patterns of use of occupant controlled office lighting. Lighting Research and Technology, 35(1), 43–57. doi: 10.1191/1477153503li061oa
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, W., Athienitis, A., Bucking, S., Doiron, M., & Kesik, T. (2010). A study of design tools and processes through a near net-zero energy house redesign. Proceedings of the EuroSun 2010.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, W., Kapsis, K., & Athienitis, A. K. (2013). Manually-operated window shade patterns in office buildings: A critical review. Building and Environment, 60, 319–338. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, B. W., & Brager, G. S. (2004). "A better way to predict comfort: The new ASHRAE standard 55-2004."
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, M. J. (1994). Work space adjustability, storage, and enclosure as predictors of employee reactions and performance. Environment and Behavior, 26(4), 504–526. doi: 10.1177/001391659402600403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciuk, M. (1989). The role of personal control of the environment in thermal comfort and satisfaction at the workplace, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
   Google Scholar
• Page, J., Robinson, D., Morel, N., & Scartezzini, J.-L. (2008). A generalised stochastic model for the simulation of occupant presence. Energy and Buildings, 40(2), 83–98. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parys, W., Saelens, D., Roels, S., & Hens, H. (2011). How important is the implementing of stochastic and variable internal boundary conditions in dynamic building simulation? CISBAT 11: Cleantech for sustainable buildings – from nano to urban scale: 799–805.
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, S., Eilers, M., & Reed, J. (1996). Behavioral aspects of lighting and occupancy sensors in private offices: A case study of a university office building. ACEEE 1996 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rea, M. S. (1984). Window blind occlusion: A pilot study. Building and Environment, 19(2), 133–137. doi: 10.1016/0360-1323(84)90038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F. (2004). Lightswitch-2002: A model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy, 77(1), 15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F., & Voss, K. (2003). Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds. Lighting Research and Technology, 35(3), 243–258. doi: 10.1191/1365782803li064oa
   Google Scholar
• Roche, L. (2002). Summertime performance of an automated lighting and blinds control system. Lighting Research and Technology, 34(1), 11–25. doi: 10.1191/1365782802li026oa
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. I., Collins, B. L., & Tibbott, R. L. (1978). Window blinds as a potential energy saver: A case study, US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D. (2006). Optimal state estimation: Kalman, H infinity, and nonlinear approaches. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, A. (1995). Occupant use of lighting controls: A review of current practice, problems, and how to avoid them. Proceedings of the CIBSE National Conference. Eastbourne. London. UK. p.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, A. (1996). Lighting controls in offices: How to improve occupant comfort and energy efficiency. Proceedings of the CIBSE National Lighting Conference, Bath, London, UK: CIBSE.
   Google Scholar
• Thrun, S. (2003). Learning occupancy grid maps with forward sensor models. Autonomous Robots, 15(2), 111–127. doi: 10.1023/A:1025584807625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzempelikos, A. (2010). The impact of manual light switching on lighting energy consumption for a typical office building. Proceedings of 1st International High Performance Buildings Conference. Purdue University, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Tzempelikos, A., & Shen, H. (2013). Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance. Building and Environment, 67(0), 179–192. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya, P., McDougall, T., Steinbock, J., Douglas, J., & Eijadi, D. (2004). What's Wrong with Daylighting? Where It Goes Wrong and How Users Respond to Failure. Proc. ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Wymelenberg, K. (2012). Patterns of occupant interaction with window blinds: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 51(0), 165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vine, E., Lee, E., Clear, R., DiBartolomeo, D., & Selkowitz, S. (1998). Office worker response to an automated Venetian blind and electric lighting system: a pilot study. Energy and Buildings, 28(2), 205–218. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00023-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienold, J., & Christoffersen, J. (2006). Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 743–757. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar