Voluntary programmes for building retrofits: opportunities, performance and challenges

References

• Ackerman, F. (1997). Why do we recycle? Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, D. P., & Diermeier, D. (2007). Strategic activism and nonmarket strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 599–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borck, J., & Coglianese, C. (2009). Voluntary environmental programs: Assessing their effectiveness. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 34, 305–324. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.032908.091450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, S. (2013). Financing and managing energy projects through revolving loan funds. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 6(6), 345–352. doi: 10.1089/SUS.2013.9826
   Google Scholar
• Bressers, H., De Bruijn, T., & Lulofs, K. (2009). Environmental negotiated agreement in the Netherlands. Environmental Politics, 18(1), 58–77. doi: 10.1080/09644010802624819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008). The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 460–491. doi: 10.2189/asqu.53.3.460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. (2009). Influence. New York: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J., & Valdebenito, M. J. (2013). The importation of building environmental certification systems: International usages of BREEAM and LEED. Building Research & Information, 41(6), 662–676. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2013.802115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croci, E. (2005). The handbook of environmental voluntary agreements. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, T., Ennis-Reynolds, G., Roberts, C., & Sims, S. (2009). Is there a demand for sustainable offices? An analysis of UK business occupier moves (2006–2008). Journal of Property Research, 26(1), 61–85. doi: 10.1080/09599910903290052
   Google Scholar
• EIA. (2013). How much electricity does an American home use? Retrieved 11 January 2014, from http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=97&t=3
   Google Scholar
• Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. (2010). Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. American Economic Review, 100, 2492–2509. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.5.2492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkens, D., & van der Stede, W. (2013). Strategy and control. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Financial support for energy efficiency in buildings. Report SWD(2013) 143 final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 393–420. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, K. M., & Rauch, E. M. (2006). Sustainable building rating systems: Summary. Richland: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, R. (2014). Why German homeowners are reluctant to retrofit. Building Research & Information, 42(4), 398–408. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.882738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, K., Harding, M., & Rapson, D. (2012). Split incentives in residential energy consumption. Energy Journal, 33(2), 37–62. doi: 10.5547/01956574.33.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givens, J., & Jorgenson, A. (2013). Individual environmental concern in the world polity. Social Science Research, 42(2), 418–431. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollagher, M., & Hartz-Karp, J. (2013). The role of deliberative collaborative governance in achieving sustainable cities. Sustainability, 5(6), 2343–2366. doi: 10.3390/su5062343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. (2009). The new collaborative governance: The localization of regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 36(1), 145–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00461.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler, U. (2009). Long-term building stock survival and intergenerational management: The role of institutional regimes. Building Research & Information, 37(5–6), 552–568. doi: 10.1080/09613210903189533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler, U., & Kohler, N. (2014). The ideal of resilient systems and questions for continuity. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 158–167. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.858927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofman, P., & De Bruijn, T. (2010). The emergence of sustainable innovation. In J. Sarking, J. Cordeiro & D. Vasquez Bruzt (Eds.), Facilitating sustainable innovation through collaboration (pp. 115–133). Amsterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2009). World energy outlook 2009. Paris: International Energy Agency/OECD.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2012). Tracking clean energy progress. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2013). Modernising building energy codes. Paris: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Meyer, A., & Hogan, H. (2010). Mainstreaming building energy efficiency codes in developing countries. New York: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Managan, K., Layke, J., Monica, A., & Nesler, C. (2012). Driving transformation to energy efficient buildings. Washington, DC: Institute for Building Efficiency.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J., & Revesz, R. L. (2007). Grandfathering and environmental regulation. Northwestern University Law Review, 101(4), 1677–1734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NeJaime, D. (2009). When new governance fails. Ohio State Law Journal, 70(2), 323–399.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003). Voluntary approaches for environmental policy. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Greening household behavior. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 257–299. doi: 10.1177/0013916511402673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pivo, G. (2010). Owner–tenant engagement in sustainable property investing. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 2(1), 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2009). Voluntary programs. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2013). Do voluntary programs reduce pollution? Examining ISO 14001's effectiveness across countries. Policy Studies Journal, 41(2), 273–294. doi: 10.1111/psj.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2012). Voluntary environmental programs: A comparative perspective. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(1), 123–138. doi: 10.1002/pam.20617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., Rubinson, C., Schaefer, D., Anderson, S., Williams, E., & Giesel, H. (2006). User's guide to fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Tucson: University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B. (2013). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), Anno 2013. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(2), 233–245. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009). Configurational comparative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic: The critical role of the legal environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 361–369. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunikka-Blank, M., & Galvin, R. (2012). Introducing the prebound effect: The gap between performance and actual energy consumption. Building Research & Information, 40(3), 260–273. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2012.690952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J. (2010). Country differences in sustainable consumption: The case of organic food. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 171–185. doi: 10.1177/0276146710361926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2013). Human development report 2013. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, J. (2012). Voluntary environmental governance arrangements. Environmental Policies, 21(3), 486–509. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2012.671576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, J. (2014). Governance for urban sustainability and resilience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Venesson, P. (2008). Case studies and process tracing. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences (pp. 223–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vinagre Diaz, J. J., Wilby, M. R., & Belén Rodríguez González, A. (2013). Setting up GHG-based energy efficiency targets in buildings. Energy Policy, 59(C), 633–642. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudelson, J., & Meyer, U. (2013). The world's greenest buildings. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar