Perceived control in indoor environments: a conceptual approach

References

• Ackerly, K., Brager, G., & Arens, E. (2012). Data collection methods for assessing adaptive comfort in mixed-mode buildings and personal comfort systems. University of California. Berkeley: Centre for the Built Environment, Centre for Environmental Design Research. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/64p9111k
   Google Scholar
• ASHRAE Standard 55. (2004, 2010). Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta: ASHRAE.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, N., & Standeven, M. (1997). A behavioural approach to thermal comfort assessment. International Journal of Solar Energy, 19, 21–35. doi:10.1080/01425919708914329
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P. A., Green, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (1996). Environmental psychology (4th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bischof, W., Bullinger-Naber, M., Kruppa, B., Schwab, R., & Müller, B. H. (2003). Expositionen und gesundheitliche Beeinträchtigungen in Bürogebäuden – Ergebnisse des ProKlimA-Projektes. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB.
   Google Scholar
• BNB. (2001). Bewertungssystem Nachhaltiges Bauen (BNB), Bürogebäude (Assessment System for Sustainable Building, Office Buildings), Version 2011_1, in German. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety). Retrieved November 12, 2014, from www.bnb-nachhaltigesbauen.de
   Google Scholar
• Boerstra, A. (2010, April 9–11). Personal control in future thermal comfort standards? In Proceedings of 6th Windsor Conference: Adapting to change: New thinking on comfort (8 pp.), Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK. London: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Boerstra, A. C., & Beuker, T. C. (2011). Impact of perceived personal control over indoor climate on health and comfort in Dutch offices. In Proceedings 12th international conference on indoor air quality and climate (Vol. 3, pp. 2402–2407). Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Boerstra, A., Beuker, T., Loomans, M., & Hensen, J. (2013). Impact of available and perceived control on comfort and health in European offices. Architectural Science Review, 56(1), 30–41. doi:10.1080/00038628.2012.744298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerstra, A., Loomans, M., & Hensen, J. (2012, July 8–12). Modelling control over indoor climate. In Proceedings: Healthy Buildings Conference, Brisbane, International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate – ISIAQ, paper 6.E.2.
   Google Scholar
• Bordass, W., & Leaman, A. (1997). Future buildings and their services. Building Research and Information, 25(4), 190–195. doi:10.1080/096132197370309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordass, W., Leaman, A., & Bunn, R. (2007). Controls for end users: A guide for good design and implementation. Reading, UK: Building Controls Industry Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cabanac, M. (1971). Physiological role of pleasure. Science, 173(4002), 1103–1107. doi:10.1126/science.173.4002.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabanac, M. (1996). Pleasure and joy, and their role in human life. Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Proceedings Indoor Air, 1996, 3, 3–13
   Google Scholar
• de Dear, R. (2011). Revisiting an old hypothesis of human thermal perception: Alliesthesia. Building Research and Information, 39(2), 108–117. doi:10.1080/09613218.2011.552269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dear, R. J., & Brager, G. S. (1998). Thermal adaptation in the built environment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 27, 83–96. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(97)00053-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Dear, R., Brager, G., & Cooper, D. (1997). Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference (Final report, ASHRAE Report 884).
   Google Scholar
• Deuble, M. P., & de Dear, R. J. (2012). Green occupants for green buildings: The missing link? Building and Environment, 56, 21–27. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebel, W., & Kah, O. (2003). Tracergasmessungen: Auswirkungen von Fensteröffnung bei kontrollierter Lüftung. Proceedings 7. Passivhaustagung Hamburg, Passivhaus Institut.
   Google Scholar
• EN 15251. (2007). Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. German version, August 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hellwig, R. T., Brasche, S., & Bischof, W. (2006, April 27–30). Thermal Comfort in Offices – Natural Ventilation vs. Air Conditioning. In Proceedings Windsor Conference: Comfort and energy use in buildings – getting them right. Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK. London: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Hellwig, R. T., Nöske, I., Brasche, S., Gebhardt, Hj., Levchuk, I., Bux, K., & Bischof, W. (2012, July 8–12). Subjective and Objective Assessment of Office Performance and Heat Strain at Elevated Temperatures – The HESO-Study. In Healthy Buildings Conference, Brisbane, International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate – ISIAQ, paper 7C.7.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 7730. (2006). Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria (ISO 7730:2005). German version, May, 2006. Berlin: Beuth.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241-11. (1998). Ergonomics of human system interaction: Guidance on usability. Berlin: Beuth.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. A. (1974). Privacy as personal control. In D. H. Carson (Ed.), Man–environment interactions: Selected papers presented at EDRA 5 (Vol. 6, pp. 83–100). Washington, DC: Environmental Design Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & de Dear, R. (2012). Impact of different building ventilation modes on occupant expectations of the main IEQ factors. Building and Environment, 57, 184–193. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küller, R. (1991). Environmental assessment from a neurophysiological perspective. In T. Gärling & G. W. Evans (Eds.), Environment, cognition and action – an integrated approach (pp. 111–147). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, A. (2013, February 8). Usable buildings and the performance gap. Collaboration Oxford, Lunchtime seminar series, Shulman Auditorium, Queen's College Oxford. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from www.usablebuildings.co.uk
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (1999). Productivity in buildings: The ‘killer' variables. Building Research and Information, 27(1), 4–19. doi:10.1080/096132199369615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2007). Are users more tolerant of ‘green' buildings? Building Research and Information, 35(6), 662–673. doi:10.1080/09613210701529518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2010). Can personal control over the physical environment ease distractions in office workplaces? Ergonomics, 53(3), 324–335. doi:10.1080/00140130903389019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, J. F., & Humphreys, M. A. (1973). Thermal comfort as part of a self-regulating system. Building Research and Practice, 1(3), 174–179. doi:10.1080/09613217308550237
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, J. F., & Humphreys, M. A. (2002). Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energy and Buildings, 34(6), 563–572. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00006-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciuk, M. (1990). The role of personal control of the environment in thermal comfort and satisfaction at the workplace. In R. I. Selby, K. H. Anthony, J. Choi, & B. Orland (Eds.), Coming of age. Environmental design research association (pp. 303–312). Oklahoma: EDRA 21.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. doi:10.1037/h0092976
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rotter, J. B. (1982). The development and application of social learning theory. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Schweiker, M., Brasche, S., Bischof, W., Hawighorst, M., Voss, K., & Wagner, A. (2012). Development and validation of a methodology to challenge the adaptive comfort model. Building and Environment, 49, 336–347. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiker, M., Brasche, S., Hawighorst, M., Bischof, W., & Wagner, A. (2014, April 10–13). Presenting LOBSTER, an innovative climate chamber, and the analysis of the effect of a ceiling fan on the thermal sensation and performance under summer conditions in an office-like setting. In Proceedings of 8th Windsor Conference: Counting the Cost of comfort in a changing world (pp. 924–937), Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK. London: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P. (1972). Learned helplessness. Annual Review of Medicine, 23(1), 407–412. doi:10.1146/annurev.me.23.020172.002203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrod, D. R., & Cohen, S. (1979). Density, personal control, and design. In J. Aiello & A. Baum (Eds.), Residential crowding and design (pp. 217–227). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F., Carmona-Andreu, I., & Hancock, M. (2013). The usability of control interfaces in low-carbon housing. Architectural Science Review, 56(1), 70–82. doi:10.1080/00038628.2012.746934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. doi:10.3102/00346543068002202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch, R., & Arkkelin, D. (1995). Environmental psychology – an interdisciplinary perspective. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar