Effects of perceived indoor temperature on daylight glare perception

References

• American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE). (2003). ASHRAE 55: Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.
   Google Scholar
• Badia, P., Myers, B., Boecker, M., Culpepper, J., & Harsh, J. R. (1991). Bright light effects on body temperature, alertness, EEG and behavior. Physiology and Behavior, 50(3), 583–588. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(91)90549-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, P. (2003). Human factors in lighting. Lighting Research Center (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, P. (2014). Human factors in lighting (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brager, G., & de Dear, R. (1998). Thermal adaptation in the built environment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 27, 83–96. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(97)00053-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brager, G., Zhang, H., & Arens, E. (2015). Evolving opportunities for providing thermal comfort. Building Research & Information, 43(3), 274–287. doi:10.1080/09613218.2015.993536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candas, V., & Dufour, A. (2005). Thermal comfort: Multisensory interactions? Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, 24(1), 33–36. doi:10.2114/jpa.24.33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christoffersen, J., & Wienold, J. (2005). Monitoring procedure for assessment of user reaction to glare. Report for Energy and Comfort Control for Building management systems (ECCO-Build), EU Commission. Report ECCO-DBUR-0303-01.
   Google Scholar
• Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). (2002). 12464-1: 2002 Light and lighting – Lighting of work places – Part 1: Indoor work places. Brussels: CEN.
   Google Scholar
• de Dear, R., & Brager, G. S. (1998). Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Transactions, 104(1), 145–167.
   Google Scholar
• DiLaura, D. L., Houser, K. W., Mistrick, R. G., & Steffy, G. R. (2010). The lighting handbook: Reference and application. New York, NY: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
   Google Scholar
• Eble-Hankins, M. L., & Waters, C. E. (2009). Subjective impression of discomfort glare from sources of non-uniform luminance. Leukos, 6(1), 51–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanger, P. O. (1970). Thermal comfort. Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiro, M. G., Rea, M. S., & Bullough, J. D. (2006). Circadian effectiveness of two polychromatic lights in suppressing human nocturnal melatonin. Neuroscience Letters, 406(3), 293–297. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashizume, A., Kurosu, M., & Kaneko, T. (2007). Multi-window system and the working memory. In Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics (pp. 297–305). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, R. G. (1950). The multiple criterion technique of subjective appraisal. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2(3), 124–131. doi:10.1080/17470215008416585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, R. G. (1972). Glare from daylighting in buildings. Applied Ergonomics, 3(4), 206–215. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(72)90102-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). (2000). The lighting handbook, 9th ed. New York: IESNA.
   Google Scholar
• Iwata, T., & Tokura, M. (1998). Examination of the limitations of predicted glare sensation vote (PGSV) as a glare index for a large source: Towards a comprehensive development of discomfort glare evaluation. Lighting Research and Technology, 30(2), 81–88. doi:10.1177/096032719803000205
   Google Scholar
• Jakubiec, J. A., & Reinhart, C. F. (2012). The ‘adaptive zone' – A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces. Lighting Research and Technology, 44(2), 149–170. doi:10.1177/1477153511420097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindienst, S., & Andersen, M. (2012). Comprehensive annual daylight design through a goal-based approach. Building Research & Information, 40(2), 154–173. doi:10.1080/09613218.2012.641301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaragurubaran, V., & Inanici, M. (2013). Hdrscope: High dynamic range image processing toolkit for lighting simulations and analysis. Proceedings of the BS2013: 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association (pp. 25–28).
   Google Scholar
• Laforgue, P., Souyri, B., Fontoynont, M., Achard, G., Génie, L., Supérieure, E., … Cédex, A. V. (1997). Simulation of visual and thermal comfort related to daylighting and Solar radiation in office buildings. Prague: International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA).
   Google Scholar
• Laurentin, C., Bermtto, V., & Fontoynont, M. (2000). Effect of thermal conditions and light source type on visual comfort appraisal. Lighting Research and Technology, 32(4), 223–233. doi:10.1177/096032710003200406
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, B. L., & Badia, P. (1993). Immediate effects of different light intensities on body temperature and alertness. Physiology and Behavior, 54(1), 199–202. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(93)90067-P
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzal, A. a. (2005). A new evaluation method for daylight discomfort glare. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35(4), 295–306. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2004.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. M., Nilsson, T. H., & Johnson, M. (1984). Interaction of temperature, illuminance and apparent time on sedentary work fatigue. Ergonomics, 27(1), 89–101. doi:10.1080/00140138408963466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulou, M., & Steemers, K. (2003). Thermal comfort and psychological adaptation as a guide for designing urban spaces. Energy and Buildings, 35(1), 95–101. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00084-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhaus, W. K. E. (1996). Discomfort glare from large area glare sources at computer workstations. Proceedings for the 1996 International Daylight Workshop, Building with Daylight: Energy-Efficient Design, Perth, WA, Australia (pp. 103–110).
   Google Scholar
• Rea, M. S., & Figueiro, M. G. (2014). Quantifying light-dependent circadian disruption in humans and animal models. Chronobiology International, 31(10), 1239–1246. doi:10.3109/07420528.2014.957302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R. G., & Pattini, A. (2010). Determinación de satisfacción visual por medio de Evaluaciones Post Ocupacionales en edificios no residenciales. El caso de oficinas. In Avances en Energias Renovables y Medio Ambiente (pp. 57–64). Salta: Asociación Argentina de Energía Solar.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R. G., & Pattini, A. (2012). Tolerance of discomfort glare from a large area source for work on a visual display. Lighting Research and Technology, 46(2), 147–170.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, A., & Refinetti, R. (1996). Day–night difference in the preferred ambient temperature of human subjects. Physiology and Behavior, 59(4), 1001–1003. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(95)02181-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, A. I., & Boyce, P. R. (1990). Illuminance uniformity on desks: Where is the limit? Lighting Research and Technology, 22(4), 165–174. doi:10.1177/096032719002200401
   Google Scholar
• Tuaycharoen, N., & Tregenza, P. R. (2007). View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Research and Technology, 39(2), 185–200. doi:10.1177/1365782807077193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Wymelenberg, K., & Inanici, M. (2014). A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight. Leukos, 10(3), 145–164. doi:10.1080/15502724.2014.881720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Wymelenberg, K., Inanici, M., & Johnson, P. (2010). The effect of luminance distribution patterns on occupant preference in a daylit office environment. Leukos, 7(2), 103–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (1998). Determinants of lighting quality I: State of the science. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 27(1), 92–106. doi:10.1080/00994480.1998.10748215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L., & Ye, K. (1993). Probability and statistics for engineers and scientists (Vol. 5). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J. (2009a). Daylight glare in offices (PhD Thesis). Universität Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• Wienold, J. (2009b). Dynamic daylight glare evaluation. Proceedings of Building Simulation (pp. 944–951).
   Google Scholar
• Yamin, J., Pattini, A., & Rodriguez, R. (2014). Glare indicators: An analysis of ocular behaviour in an office equipped with venetian blinds. Indoor and Built Environment. doi:10.1177/1420326X14538082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamin, J., Rodriguez, R. G., Ruiz, A., & Pattini, A. E. (2014). Degree of eye opening: A new discomfort glare indicator. Building and Environment, 88, 142–150. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar