Housing performance evaluation: challenges for international knowledge exchange

References

• Adamczyk, A. (2015). Prawo inwestycyjne a gospodarka. Conference Proceedings Prawo inwestycyjne a jakosc zycia, Malopolska Izba Architektow: Krakow. pp. 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Baborska-Narożny, M. (2017). Building performance evaluation – understanding the benefits and risks for the stakeholders involved: Lessons for Poland based on the UK experience. Architectus, 49(1), 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Baborska-Narożny, M., & Bać, A. (2013). Comparison of design intentions and construction solutions delivered to enhance environmental performance and minimize carbon emissions of a new public school in Wroclaw. In A. Håkansson, M. Höjer, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international conference on sustainability in energy and buildings (SEB’12), Stockholm, Sweden, 3–5 September 2012 (pp. 591–600). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baborska-Narożny, M., & Stevenson, F. (2017). Field studies in occupied buildings and the building performance evaluation (BPE) approach – polish and British practice. Architectus, 49(1), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Baborska-Narozny, M., Stevenson, F., & Grudzinska, M. (2017). Overheating in retrofitted flats: Occupant practices, learning and interventions. Building Research & Information, 45(1–2), 40–59. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1226671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcerowicz, L. (1995). Socialism, capitalism, transformation. Budapest: Central European University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa Villa, S., & Walber Orenstein, S. (2013). Housing projects and environmental quality: Methodological aspects of post-occupancy evaluation and practical applications. Sao Paulo: Oficina de Textos.
   Google Scholar
• Bartiaux, F., Gram-Hanssen, K., Fonseca, P., Ozoliņa, L., & Christensen, T. H. (2014). A practice–theory approach to homeowners’ energy retrofits in four European areas. Building Research & Information, 42(4), 525–538. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.900253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, A., & Osland, J. S. (2005). Making sense of intercultural collaboration. International Studies of Management & Organisation, 35(4), 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Brager, G., & Baker, L. (2009). Occupant satisfaction in mixed-mode buildings. Building Research & Information, 37(4), 369–380. doi: 10.1080/09613210902899785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnen, M. (2013). Advancing a ‘new professionalism’: Professionalization, practice and institutionalization. Building Research & Information, 41(6), 735–741. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2013.843269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57. Retrieved from http://sjbae.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/47249420/1116_Organizational_learning_and_communities_of_practice.pdf doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, L. F., Lowe, R., Raslan, R., Altamirano-Medina, H., & Wingfield, J. (2014). A socio-technical approach to post-occupancy evaluation: Interactive adaptability in domestic retrofit. Building Research & Information, 42(5), 574–590. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.912539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. (2003). Green buildings – reconciling technological change and occupant expectations. In R. J. Cole & R. Lorch (Eds.), Buildings, culture and environment: Informing local and global practices (pp. 57–82). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J., & Lorch, R. (2003). Introduction: Knowledge, values and building design. In R. J. Cole & R. Lorch (Eds.), Buildings, culture and environment: Informing local and global practices (pp. 1–8). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Colmer, M. (2017). The performance gap: The UK experience and the polish potential for using building performance evaluation. Architectus, 49(1), 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Curwell, S. (2003). BEQUEST – an international cross-cultural cooperation and information. In R. J. Cole & R. Lorch (Eds.), Buildings, culture and environment: Informing local and global practices (pp. 202–227). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• de T’Serclaes, P. (2007). Financing energy efficient homes: Existing policy responses to financial barriers, IEA Information Paper. Paris: IEA.
   Google Scholar
• England, K. V. L. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46(1), 80–89. Retrieved from http://www.praxis-epress.org/CGR/18-England.pdf doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA). (2012). EDRA 43, Seattle, placemaking. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association Seattle, Washington May 30 – June 2, 2012. Editors: Rula Awwad-Rafferty, R.A., & Lynne C. Manzo, L.C., Associate Editors: O’Donnell, K., Wolfe, J., & Yoon, H-G.H. Retrieved from http://www.edra.org/news/307700/EDRA43-Seattle-Conference-Proceedings-Now-Available.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Commission staff working paper: Impact assessment. SEC (2011) 1427 final. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Marie Curie Actions, guide for applicants (call-specific) intra-European fellowships 2012. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Marie Slodowska-Curie Actions. A pocket guide: Your passport to a successful research career. Brussels: Author. doi: 10.2766/65630
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014a). Eurostat Statistics Explained. Greenhouse gas emissions by economic activity and by pollutant, EU-28, 2014. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/File:Greenhouse_gas_emissions_by_economic_activity_and_by_pollutant,_EU-28,_2014_(thousand_tonnes_of_CO2_equivalents)_YB17.png
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2014). Horizon 2020 in brief. Luxembourg: Author. doi: 10.2777/3719
   Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, J. R. (2010). Global architects: Learning and innovation through communities and constellations of practice. Environment and Planning A, 42(12), 2842–2858. doi: 10.1068/a4311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernie, S., Leiringer, R., & Thorpe, T. (2006). Change in construction: A critical perspective. Building Research & Information, 34(2), 91–103. doi: 10.1080/09613210500491639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, C. (2012). In S. Mallory-Hill, W. F. E. Preiser, & C. Watson (Eds.), Enhancing building performance: Building performance evaluation (BPE) and the role of perceived values in heritage preservation – a research case for Italy (pp. 152–163). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, R. (2011). Discourse and Materiality in Environmental Policy: the Case of German Federal Policy on Thermal Renovation of Existing Homes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of East Anglia. Norwich. Retrieved from http://justsolutions.eu/Resources/PhDGalvinFinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gann, D. M. (2003). Trading places – sharing knowledge about environmental building techniques. In R. J. Cole & R. Lorch (Eds.), Buildings, culture and environment: Informing local and global practices (pp. 37–53). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Glowitz, J. E. (2015). Critical factors influencing knowledge exchange between global STEM organisations. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://media.proquest.com/media/pq/classic/doc/3984419401/fmt/ai/rep/NPDF?_s=ne0ykNVDru5ZOUo7ugy%2BCjbG0Hk%3D
   Google Scholar
• Göçer, Ö., Hua, Y., & Göçer, K. (2015). Completing the missing link in building design process: Enhancing post-occupancy evaluation method for effective feedback for building performance. Building and Environment, 89, 14–27. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjri, K., & Crozier, C. (2009). Post-occupancy evaluation: Purpose, benefits and barriers. Facilities, 27(1/2), 21–33. doi: 10.1108/02632770910923063
   Google Scholar
• Heeg, S., & Bitterer, N. (2015). Communities of practice and transnational standards: Changing building practices in Warsaw’s commercial property sector. Global Networks, 15(3), 343–359. doi: 10.1111/glob.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innovate UK. (2016a). Building performance evaluation programme: Findings from domestic projects – making reality match design. Swindon: Technology Strategy Board.
   Google Scholar
• Innovate UK. (2016b). About BPE. Retrieved from https://connect.innovateuk.org/web/building-performance-evaluation/about-bpe
   Google Scholar
• Innovate UK. (2016c). Building Performance Evaluation, Tools and Methods. Retrieved from https://connect.innovateuk.org/web/building-performance-evaluation/tools-and-methods
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). (2010). Sustainability in building construction — Framework for methods of assessment of the environmental performance of construction works — Part 1: Buildings. ISO. Retrieved from http://hsevi.ir/RI_Standard/File/10460
   Google Scholar
• International Panel on Climate Change (ICCP). (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), pp. 1535. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, M., Hirst, N., & Gambhir, A. (2011). Reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the global building sector to 2050. (Report GR3). London: Imperial College, Grantham Institute for Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Kimble, C., Grenier, C., & Goglio-Primard, K. (2010). Innovation and knowledge sharing across professional boundaries: Political interplay between boundary objects and brokers. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 437–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimble, C., & Hildreth, P. (2005). Dualities, distributed communities of practice and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 102–113. doi: 10.1108/13673270510610369
   Google Scholar
• Kolczynska, M. (2015). Zaufanie do instytucji państwowych. Warszawa, Poland: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk. Retrieved from http://polpan.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/POLPAN_raport_Zaufanie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz, Z. W., & Matczak, P. (2012). Climate change regional review: Poland. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3, 297–311. doi: 10.1002/wcc.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundzewicz, Z. W., Painter, J., & Kundzewicz, W. J. (2017). Climate change in the media: Poland’s exceptionalism. Environmental Communication (submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Lavis, J., Ross, S., McLeod, C., & Gildiner, A. (2003). Measuring the impact of health research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 8, 165–170. doi: 10.1258/135581903322029520
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., & Bordass, B. (2010). Building evaluation: Practice and principles. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 564–577. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2010.495217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P., Edwards, D., Love, J., & Irani, Z. (2011). Champions of practice: Context and habitus for unbounded learning in construction projects. Facilities, 29(5/6), 193–208. doi: 10.1108/02632771111120510
   Google Scholar
• Mallory-Hill, S., Preiser, W. F. E., & Watson, C. (Eds.). (2012). Enhancing building performance. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, T., & The Building Performance Research Unit. (1972). Building performance. London: Applied Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerstwo Infrastruktury i Budownictwa (MIB). (2016). Problemy w dziedzinie planowania przestrzennego – materiał informacyjny na posiedzenie Komisji Samorządu Terytorialnego i Polityki Regionalnej w dniu 11 maja 2016 r. Retrieved from https://mib.gov.pl/files/0/1797146/raportproblemyplanowaniaprzestrzennego.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moncaster, A., Hinds, D., Cruickshank, H., Guthrie, P. M., Crishna, N., Baker, K., … Jowitt, P.W. (2010). Knowledge exchange between academia and industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability, 163(3), 167–174. doi: 10.1680/ensu.2010.163.3.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, K., & Nowak-Dzieszko, K. (2017). Field measurements in buildings and their importance for the developers. Architectus, 1(49), 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Nowakowski, K. (2008). Wymiary zaufania i problem zaufania negatywnego w polsce. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 70(1), 213–233.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. (2003). Technology transfer – a vernacular view. In R. J. Cole & R. Lorch (Eds.), Buildings, culture and environment: Informing local and global practices (pp. 37–53). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ostanska A. (2017). Multi aspect research of housing developments seeking retrofit recommendations. Architectus, 49(1), 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2015). Are humans good sensors? Using occupants as sensors for indoor environmental quality assessment and for developing thresholds that matter. Dissertations. Paper 595. Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1633&context=dissertations
   Google Scholar
• Preiser, W. F. E., & Schramm, U. (2012). This is a chapter. In S. Mallory-Hill, W. F. E. Preiser & C. Watson (Eds.), Enhancing building performance: A process model for building performance evaluation (pp. 19–31). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Prieser, W., & Vischer, J. (Eds.). (2005). Assessing building performance. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Introduction. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rozwadowska A. (2013). Nowe osiedla gorsze niż wielka płyta? Architektura, ale bez urbanistyki. Glos wielkopolski. 13 May 2013. Retrieved from http://www.gloswielkopolski.pl/artykul/892102,nowe-osiedla-gorsze-niz-wielka-plyta-architektura-ale-bez-urbanistyki,2,id,t,sa.html
   Google Scholar
• Ruikar, K., Koskela, L., & Sexton, M. (2009). Communities of practice in construction case study organisations : Questions and insights. Construction Innovation, 9(4), 434–448. doi: 10.1108/14714170910995967
   Google Scholar
• Sanni-Anibire, M., Hassanain, M. A., & Al-Hammad, A. (2016). Post-occupancy evaluation of housing facilities: Overview and summary of methods. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(5). doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanoff, H. (1968). Evaluation techniques for designers. North Carolina: North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F. (2009). Post-occupancy evaluation and sustainability: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Urban Design and Planning, 162(3), 123–130. doi: 10.1680/udap.2009.162.3.123
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F., Baborska-Narozny, M., & Chatterton, P. (2016). Resilience, redundancy and low-carbon living: Co-producing individual and community learning. Building Research & Information, 44(7), 789–803. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1207371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tymkiewicz, J., & Kucharczyk-Brus, B. (2017). Silesian school of qualitative research – 20 years of experience and lessons learned from qualitative research in buildings of various functions. Architectus, 1(49), 63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Vlasova, L., & Gram-Hanssen, K. (2014). Incorporating inhabitants’ everyday practices into domestic retrofits. Building Research & Information, 42(40), 512–524. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.907682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2003). This is a chapter. In D. Nicole, S. Gheradi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organisations: Communities of practice and learning social systems (pp. 76–99). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2010). This is a chapter. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Communities of practice and social learning systems: Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. Milton Keynes: Springer and Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T., Soebarto, V., & Radford, A. (2010). Comfort and energy use in five Australian award-winning houses: Regulated, measured and perceived. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 509–529. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2010.494890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilner, K., Wiber, M., Charles, A., Kearney, J., Landry, M., & Wilson, L. (2012). Transformative learning for better resource management: The role of critical reflection. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55, 1331–1347. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2011.646679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, N., Corriveau, M., Nguyen, V. M., Cooke, S. J., & Hinch, S. G. (2016). How do potential knowledge users evaluate new claims about a contested resource? Problems of power and politics in knowledge exchange and mobilization. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, 380–388. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape and planning. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar