Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics

References

• Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., & Swait, J. (1998). Introduction to attribute-based stated choice methods. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAS).
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, B. K. P. D., Muthaly, S., & Leenders, M. (2016). Insights from coworking spaces as unique service organizations: The role of physical and social elements. In L. Petruzzellis & R. S. Winer (Eds.), Rediscovering the essentiality of marketing, developments in marketing science: Proceedings of the academy of marketing (pp. 837–848). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat, C. R. (2001). Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 35(7), 677–693. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00014-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, M., & Foth, M. (2013). Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning. Library Hi Tech, 31(2), 254–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., & Reuschl, A. J. (2016). Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, Advance online publication. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y
   Google Scholar
• Calder, M., & Courtney, S. (1992). Business centers: The UK picture. Property Management, 10(2), 106–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02637479210030268
   Google Scholar
• Capdevila, I. (2013). Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Spaces as microclusters. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=241412
   Google Scholar
• Capdevila, I. (2015). Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3), 1–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrzan, K. (1994). Three kinds of order effects in choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 5, 165–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994106
   Google Scholar
• Corenet Global. (2016). Coworking: A corporate real estate perspective. Retrieved from http://www.hok.com/uploads/2017/11/08/us-coworking-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, D. A. M. (2017). Workspace preferences of employees in the activity-based office: A stated choice approach to determine the workspace preferences of employees in municipal buildings (Master’s thesis). Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar
• De Been, I., & Beijer, M. (2014). The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 12(2), 142–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-02-2013-0011
   Google Scholar
• Deijl, C. M. (2011). Two heads are better than one, a case study of the co-working community in the Netherlands (Master’s thesis). Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Deskmag. (2012). The 2nd annual coworking survey. Retrieved from http://reseau.fing.org/file/download/128857
   Google Scholar
• Deskmag. (2013). The 3rd Global Coworking Survey. Retrieved from https://communityjelly.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/3rdglobalcoworkingsurvey-121108034918-phpapp02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deskmag. (2015). The 5th Global Coworking Survey. Retrieved from http://www.deskmag.com/en/first-results-of-the-newglobal-coworking-survey-2015-16
   Google Scholar
• Fruianu, M., De Leeuw, M., & Nilsen, F. (2011). De Stad als Werkplek. Een verkennend onderzoek naar derde werklocaties (Master’s thesis). NICIS-NSOB, Strategic Urban Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Fuzi, A. (2015). Coworking spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: The case of South Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 462–469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuzi, A., Clifton, N., & Loudon, G. (2014). New in-house organizational spaces that support creativity and innovation: The co-working space. Paper presented at R&D management conference, Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of co-working spaces: A literature review. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 15(1), 193–205.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Bacevice, P. A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6), 821–842. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdenitsch, C., Scheel, T. E., Andorfer, J., & Korunka, C. (2016). Coworking spaces: A source of social support for independent professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(581), 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson, V. A., & Lizieri, C. M. (1999). The role of serviced office space in office markets and corporate property portfolios. Reading: University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Hartog, L. M., Weijs-Perrée, M., & Appel-Meulenbroek, H. A. J. A. (2017). The influence of personality on user satisfaction: Multi-tenant offices. Building Research and Information, Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1307015
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., & Greene, W. H. (2001). The mixed logit model: The state of practice and warnings for the unwary. Sydney: Institute of Transport Studies, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2015). Applied choice analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. (2011). Coworking core-value. Retrieved from http://dangerouslyawesome.com/tag/core-values/
   Google Scholar
• Huwart, J. Y., Dichter, G., & Vanrie, P. (2012). Coworking collaborative spaces for micro entrepreneurs. EBN Technical Notes, no. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, T., & Gratton, L. (2013). The third wave of virtual work: Knowledge workers are now untethered, able to perform tasks anywhere at any time. What do the best of them want from your organization. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ketting, J. R. (2014). Het bedrijfsverzamelgebouw: een onderzoek naar de toegevoegde waarde van bedrijfsverzamelgebouwen (Master’s thesis). TU Delft, Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & de Dear, R. (2013). Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, I., & Nenonen, S. (2014). User experience in an academic coworking place: The case of Aalto university’s design factory. In P. A. Jensen (Ed.), CIB facilities management conference 2014 (pp. 341–353). Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, I., & Nenonen, S. (2016). Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland – what and how? Facilities, 34(5/6), 302–313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-08-2014-0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojo, I., & Nenonen, S. (2017). Evolution of co-working places: Drivers and possibilities. Intelligent Buildings International, 9(3), 164–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2014.987640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski, A., & Buczynski, B. (2011). Coworking: Building community as a space catalyst. Fort Collins, CO: Cohere Coworking.
   Google Scholar
• Laterveer, M. (2011). Serviced offices; een dynamische markt in opkomst (Master’s thesis). Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Isaac, H. (2016). The new office: How coworking changes the work concept. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(6), 3–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-10-2015-0105
   Google Scholar
• Leforestier, A. (2009). The co-working space concept. Retrieved from http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/users/anilg/files/Articles/Co-working%20space.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. L., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D., & Train, K. (2000). Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447–470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 15(1), 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Molin, E., Oppewal, H., & Timmermans, H. (1996). Predicting consumer response to new housing: A stated choice experiment. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 11(3), 297–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496593
   Google Scholar
• Moriset, B. (2013). Building new places of the creative economy, the rise of coworking spaces. Proceedings of the 2nd geography of innovation international conference 2013. Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Orel, M. (2015). Working in co working spaces: The social and economic engagement of European youth. In Youth Partnership (Ed.), Perspectives on youth, Vol. 2: Connections and disconnection (pp. 133–139). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Parrino, L. (2015). Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 13, 261–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remøy, H., & Van der Voordt, T. (2013). Adaptability – How to accommodate changing user preferences. Paper presented at European Real Estate Society Conference, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Remøy, H., & Van der Voordt, T. J. M. (2014). Priorities in accommodating office user preferences: Impact on office users decision to stay or go. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 16(2), 140–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-09-2013-0029
   Google Scholar
• Roth, K., & Mirchandani, N. (2016). The rise of co-working: A growing workplace movement. Corporate Real Estate Journal, 5(4), 314–328.
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, P., Lindholm, A.-L., Hyvönen, A., & Nenonen, S. (2011). User preferences of office occupiers: Investigating the differences. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(2), 81–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14630011111136803
   Google Scholar
• Rus, A., & Orel, M. (2015). Coworking: A community of work. Teorija in Praksa, 52(6), 1017–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöpfel, J., Roche, J., & Hubert, G. (2015). Co-working and innovation: New concepts for academic libraries and learning centres. New Library World, 116, 67–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-06-2014-0072
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G., Bacevice, P., & Garrett, L. (2015). Why people thrive in coworking spaces. Harvard Business Review, 93(9), 28–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sykes, K. (2014). Coworking: A workplace paradigm shift. Contract, 55(6), 140–145.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, J., & Stijnenbosch, M. H. (2009). Atlas bedrijvencentra: een inventarisatie van bedrijvencentra met voorzieningen. Stogo onderzoek + Advies.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meel, J., & Vos, P. (2001). Funky offices: Reflections on office design in the ‘new economy’. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 3(4), 322–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010110811661
   Google Scholar
• Waber, B., Magnolfi, J., & Lindsay, G. (2014). Workspaces that move people. Harvard Business Review, 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters-Lynch, J. M., & Potts, J. (2017). The social economy of coworking spaces: A focal point model of coordination. Review of Social Economy, Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2016.1269938
   Google Scholar
• Weijs-Perrée, M., Appel-Meulenbroek, H. A. J. A., de Vries, B., & Romme, A. G. L. (2016). Differences between business center concepts in the Netherlands. Property Management, 34(2), 100–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-04-2015-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar